View Full Version : Next Senior Men's Team Manager - Runners and Riders
Jolly Red Giant
22/01/2024, 11:07 PM
Now now don't you remember when things go right it's Chris Hughton good, but when things go wrong it's clearly someone else's fault.
Well Hughton spoke for himself this evening -
"As a coach I haven't done well in this competition... I take responsibility for this results we have had in this competition"
Throwing away a two goal lead and second place in the group - in injury time - was bad - and the winning goal for Cape Verde in the first game was also in injury time - the one good performance they had was against Egypt and they should have won that game.
CraftyToePoke
23/01/2024, 12:28 AM
Throwing away a two goal lead and second place in the group - in injury time - was bad - and the winning goal for Cape Verde in the first game was also in injury time - the one good performance they had was against Egypt and they should have won that game.
The Egypt match, Ghana put 11 players in their own half from the beginning of the second half to protect their 1-0 lead. It was too early to try to hang on, they duly conceded but then took the lead again within three minutes & a further three minutes later it was 2-2. They were in the match, they had played some lovely stuff & Egypt had lost Salah to a first half injury. Why put 11 behind the ball ? They were doing absolutely fine, no need to react so conservatively.
Jolly Red Giant
23/01/2024, 7:17 AM
The Egypt match, Ghana put 11 players in their own half from the beginning of the second half to protect their 1-0 lead. It was too early to try to hang on, they duly conceded but then took the lead again within three minutes & a further three minutes later it was 2-2. They were in the match, they had played some lovely stuff & Egypt had lost Salah to a first half injury. Why put 11 behind the ball ? They were doing absolutely fine, no need to react so conservatively.
The Salah injury wasn't relevant - he was a peripheral figure in the game and injuries happen. Ghana were without Kudus against Cape Verde and arguably could have won that game if he was playing.
Ghana clearly have a very soft underbelly - they give the ball away in dangerous place and get punished and they also concede very late in games. Hughton was clearly concerned about this. Ghana have been in freefall for years and need to steady the ship before they can start moving forward again. AFCON is a highly competitive competition and several big teams have struggled. I stated before the tournament that Ghana, given where they are at, would do well to get out of the group.
But at the end of the day Hughton himself has acknowledged that it hasn't been good - they have had opportunities in each game to get a better result - and have failed. The game yesterday is probably his last in charge -and we'll see where Hughton might end up next - if anywhere.
But if the FAI are seriously considering Neil Lennon ahead of Hughton (and other potential candidates) then that shows a level of serious incompetence.
pineapple stu
23/01/2024, 7:44 AM
Another vote of confidence for Hughton tonight.
The BBC match report makes for grim reading. I mean, **** happens at times but there seems to have been a greater malaise going by comments like -
"If they do exit the competition, the four-time champions can have few complaints, having not only looked lethargic throughout against the Mambas but in their previous outings as well."
"Ghana were fortunate to have amassed a 2-0 lead, with neither of the penalty decisions awarded to them looking exactly clear-cut."
"The first penalty rewarded Ghana's bright start but their urgency disappeared after Crystal Palace forward Ayew slotted them ahead and it was the Mambas who created the better chances in open play."
"The late debacle will increase the pressure on under-fire boss Hughton, whose side have won just one of their past eight matches and are now in danger of a second successive Afcon group-stage exit."
"[Mozambique] are still yet to record a win at an Afcon finals after 15 attempts "
NeverFeltBetter
23/01/2024, 9:16 AM
He's definitely done some damage to his reputation over the last week, but I would still favour him over Lennon. I'd hate for the suits to justify Lennon's hiring on the back of that AFCON campaign.
He's definitely done some damage to his reputation over the last week, but I would still favour him over Lennon. I'd hate for the suits to justify Lennon's hiring on the back of that AFCON campaign.
Doubt Lennon is anywhere near being a serious option and that the journos probably only know as much as we do. For once it looks like the FAI are actually keeping what's happening hush hush and it's mostly guess work from the usual suspects.
Fact he's also been the most vocal about wanting the job to me would show the FAI have shown minimal interest towards him. He knows this is likely the biggest job he'll get linked with for god knows how long and is trying his best to generate some buzz around his name.
texidub
23/01/2024, 10:37 AM
"Imagine there's no Lennon,
It's easy if you try.
Unless you have no imagination,
Or you're in the FAI."
texidub
23/01/2024, 10:40 AM
Difficult to get excited about Hughton after this tournament though - we need a manager that can get players to play above their weight.. something Hughton seems to have failed to do here.
Gas stuff on Ghanian breakfast TV this morning though as the presenters worked out how many dialysis patients could be paid for and how many villages could be constructed from scratch now that bonuses don't have to be paid to their footballers :D
1749742113951003020
I would be slightly surprised if it's not Carsley at this stage.
seanfhear
23/01/2024, 12:30 PM
Doubt Lennon is anywhere near being a serious option and that the journos probably only know as much as we do. For once it looks like the FAI are actually keeping what's happening hush hush and it's mostly guess work from the usual suspects.
Fact he's also been the most vocal about wanting the job to me would show the FAI have shown minimal interest towards him. He knows this is likely the biggest job he'll get linked with for god knows how long and is trying his best to generate some buzz around his name.
Yeah ~ It's a no-brainer for Lennon ~ If all the "chat " doesn't help him get the Irish job it will probably help him get some other job.
Razors left peg
23/01/2024, 1:59 PM
https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/soccer/2024/01/20/kevin-kilbane-if-the-fai-are-looking-for-a-long-term-project-all-roads-lead-to-lee-carsley/
This was an article from couple days ago by Kilbane. Clear sign that Carsley wants it and just details being negotiated at this stage. I've thought it was going to be Carsley for some time but in the last few days there have been multiple sources reporting similar things that it's getting down to the wire.
NeverFeltBetter
23/01/2024, 2:24 PM
I'd be a little wary of presenting Carsley as the guy to helm a "long-term project". Not because it isn't true, because there is some rebuilding work to be done, but whoever is in charge next needs to actually show progress relatively quickly. I don't necessarily mean tournament qualification, though that shouldn't be treated as some impossible dream in the short-term, but increased competitiveness for sure, being in that conversation. We've just finished a long-term project manager and it was a disaster. We can't start off with the next one with a similar situation whereby regression and successive lowpoints are dismissed for far too long as a consequence of the project, unimportant in the face of it.
I would be interested in hearing what it is people would expect from the next manager over the next few cycles. I'd be expecting us to have a credible effort at 2026 qualification, and getting to EURO 2028 (especially since we have additional advantages there).
Jolly Red Giant
23/01/2024, 3:14 PM
He's definitely done some damage to his reputation over the last week, but I would still favour him over Lennon. I'd hate for the suits to justify Lennon's hiring on the back of that AFCON campaign.
The reality is that Ghana is not a good team - they have Kudus who is going to be a star, but after that they have a bunch of very ordinary players. Even getting Ghana qualified for AFCON should not be underestimated - but I do agree that they blew it completely once they got there.
Where Hughton ends up next is anyone's guess - indeed whether he is interested in another job at his age is an open question (I do think he would like the Ireland job - but that might be the only one at this stage - although my contact did say that he missed the day-to-day interaction with players while working with Ghana).
Jolly Red Giant
23/01/2024, 3:16 PM
I'd be a little wary of presenting Carsley as the guy to helm a "long-term project". Not because it isn't true, because there is some rebuilding work to be done, but whoever is in charge next needs to actually show progress relatively quickly. I don't necessarily mean tournament qualification, though that shouldn't be treated as some impossible dream in the short-term, but increased competitiveness for sure, being in that conversation. We've just finished a long-term project manager and it was a disaster. We can't start off with the next one with a similar situation whereby regression and successive lowpoints are dismissed for far too long as a consequence of the project, unimportant in the face of it.
I would be interested in hearing what it is people would expect from the next manager over the next few cycles. I'd be expecting us to have a credible effort at 2026 qualification, and getting to EURO 2028 (especially since we have additional advantages there).
I do think Carsley is worth a punt - he has a growing reputation as a coach and getting him as Ireland manager at this stage is a bit of a coup. Assuming he gets the job - whether he works out - only time will tell.
I will say that I would expect some immediate improvement - Kenny was that bad that pretty much any competent coach would show an improvement.
Razors left peg
23/01/2024, 3:29 PM
I'd be a little wary of presenting Carsley as the guy to helm a "long-term project". Not because it isn't true, because there is some rebuilding work to be done, but whoever is in charge next needs to actually show progress relatively quickly. I don't necessarily mean tournament qualification, though that shouldn't be treated as some impossible dream in the short-term, but increased competitiveness for sure, being in that conversation. We've just finished a long-term project manager and it was a disaster. We can't start off with the next one with a similar situation whereby regression and successive lowpoints are dismissed for far too long as a consequence of the project, unimportant in the face of it.
I would be interested in hearing what it is people would expect from the next manager over the next few cycles. I'd be expecting us to have a credible effort at 2026 qualification, and getting to EURO 2028 (especially since we have additional advantages there).
In fairness Kilbane does say that Carsley is a mix of old school pragmatism too so yes there is a long term project but results do have to improve, especially against lesser and similar opponents to ourselves
osarusan
23/01/2024, 10:36 PM
The Lennon-Beatles posts cracking, had me laughing out loud, fair play.
1749942486418497773
No surprise really. Hopefully the FAI don't see him as a possible candidate now that he'll be cheap and available.
samhaydenjr
24/01/2024, 3:18 AM
I'd be a little wary of presenting Carsley as the guy to helm a "long-term project". Not because it isn't true, because there is some rebuilding work to be done, but whoever is in charge next needs to actually show progress relatively quickly. I don't necessarily mean tournament qualification, though that shouldn't be treated as some impossible dream in the short-term, but increased competitiveness for sure, being in that conversation. We've just finished a long-term project manager and it was a disaster. We can't start off with the next one with a similar situation whereby regression and successive lowpoints are dismissed for far too long as a consequence of the project, unimportant in the face of it.
I would be interested in hearing what it is people would expect from the next manager over the next few cycles. I'd be expecting us to have a credible effort at 2026 qualification, and getting to EURO 2028 (especially since we have additional advantages there).
For me, Success in the next campaign would be "double qualification" for the playoffs. By that I mean coming second in the main qualification group but also finishing high enough in the Nations League that we would have qualified that way anyway. With twenty-eight teams either qualifying directly or going to the playoffs, this is a an achievable goal, in my opinion. We have a better squad that's still improving and hopefully we will have a capable manager who will get the best out of them.
Eirambler
24/01/2024, 7:19 AM
We would need to win our Nations League group to make the playoffs from that route. Obviously we don't know the group yet, but that would be a big ask. Given that there will be 12 qualification groups next time, meaning the better teams will be more widely spread out, top 2 in the qualification groups is probably a more realistic route.
So I'd say looking for "double qualification" is asking a bit much, but targeting the playoffs one way or the other is realistic. That said, as long as we can see clear progress in the coming campaign (i.e. a tangible improvement in performances and results, not meaningless stuff like possession and pass completion stats), then that will be something in itself.
It's a great job for someone to come in to because the bar has been set so low. But that does make me wary that a bad manager could get a pass for a long time though achievements that actually don't amount to a lot when you step back from them (this is basically how Neil Lennon has built a management career to this point). Once we see the various groups we're drawn into we'll have a better idea of what constitutes relative success in the next cycle.
Fixer82
24/01/2024, 8:12 AM
Playing Devils advocate here but what are the pros and cons of Lennon getting the gig?
Stuttgart88
24/01/2024, 8:51 AM
Pros = generally competent and experienced. Was probably a very good manager 10-13 years ago
Cons = supervised a real decline in Celtic's standards after Rodgers left. Even when they won the league they were flat and relying on very late goals. Got outwitted by a Gerrard/Beale combo in his last season which was beyond awful. Gets very pr1ckly when the chips are down.
Overall I see no sign that he's a coach with a vision and an ability to inspire and invigorate a young squad splattered with talent and potential but no real leaders.
Diggs246
24/01/2024, 9:01 AM
Playing Devils advocate here but what are the pros and cons of Lennon getting the gig?
There is very serious social issues as well
We can't have someone who threatened to slit his mistresses throat as our manager.
Fixer82
24/01/2024, 9:07 AM
Pros = generally competent and experienced. Was probably a very good manager 10-13 years ago
Cons = supervised a real decline in Celtic's standards after Rodgers left. Even when they won the league they were flat and relying on very late goals. Got outwitted by a Gerrard/Beale combo in his last season which was beyond awful. Gets very pr1ckly when the chips are down.
Overall I see no sign that he's a coach with a vision and an ability to inspire and invigorate a young squad splattered with talent and potential but no real leaders.
Great answer. Thank you.
Fixer82
24/01/2024, 9:08 AM
There is very serious social issues as well
We can't have someone who threatened to slit his mistresses throat as our manager.
Wow. Never heard that one before
Jolly Red Giant
24/01/2024, 9:19 AM
1749942486418497773
No surprise really. Hopefully the FAI don't see him as a possible candidate now that he'll be cheap and available.
Hughton's contract was up when Ghana's participation in AFCON ended - but Hughton leaving at this point was always the expectation. The only likelihood of him staying as Ghana manager was if they got deep into the knockout stages - and even they Hughton would have ultimately decided if he wanted to continue there.
Ghana have had six different managers in the last seven years with Appiah the only one lasing longer than a year - and one of the biggest difficulties between the Ghanaian FA and the managers appointed has been the insistence that the national managers also play a prominent role in managing a team of locally based players. Think of it in terms the new Ireland manager also spending a lot of time going to LOI games and managing a LOI team - except travelling nearly 8,000 Km from where you international players play their club football. From the outset Hughton spent a lot more time in Ghana than he expected - and he made it clear that he was unwilling to spend the time demanded in the country (remember Hughton was hired and paid by the Ghanaian government - not the FA).
I suspect that he is deeply disappointed with how things have panned out - he wanted to do well in Ghana, not for reputation purposes, but because his father is from Ghana - and as I said early, I think the Irish job is the only one at this stage that would attract him in the immediate future for the same reason. After that it is very much an open question what he would do - he needed time after leaving Brighton and I think he will take time out if he doesn't get the Irish job. Ultimately he had several options before take the job at Forest - which was a big mistake from his perspective (he should have gone to WBA instead - a much better run club). Whether, apart from Ireland, another job becomes available that he thinks he can have an impact with is an open question - and whether he would want to take another job at 66/67 years of age is another story. I could see him taking on some sort of a supervisory/technical director role (indeed if Carsley gets the job he could do worse than bring Hughton on board in some sort of advisory capacity - having an old head as a sounding board for a young coach is never a bad idea).
Jolly Red Giant
24/01/2024, 9:20 AM
There is very serious social issues as well
We can't have someone who threatened to slit his mistresses throat as our manager.
Completely forgot about that - the FAI should be bombarded with protests if his name continues to be bounced around.
Jolly Red Giant
24/01/2024, 9:23 AM
Pros = generally competent and experienced. Was probably a very good manager 10-13 years ago
Cons = supervised a real decline in Celtic's standards after Rodgers left. Even when they won the league they were flat and relying on very late goals. Got outwitted by a Gerrard/Beale combo in his last season which was beyond awful. Gets very pr1ckly when the chips are down.
Overall I see no sign that he's a coach with a vision and an ability to inspire and invigorate a young squad splattered with talent and potential but no real leaders.
No evidence that he is competent - he managed Celtic when Rangers were at deaths door - he had no competition. His time with Bolton, Hibs and in Cyprus were a disaster - and is noted for fighting with and ostracising his players and club staff (clearly he has power/control issues).
Exgrad
24/01/2024, 10:59 AM
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/bolton-wanderers-boss-neil-lennon-7075826
Even if they just do the most basic due dilligence on him I can't see how the FAI can appoint Neil Lennon. If they do, they deserve everything coming their way.
weldoninhio
24/01/2024, 11:42 AM
No evidence that he is competent - he managed Celtic when Rangers were at deaths door - he had no competition. His time with Bolton, Hibs and in Cyprus were a disaster - and is noted for fighting with and ostracising his players and club staff (clearly he has power/control issues).
He got Celtic out of the group stages of the CL. Is that not "competition"? Beating one of the best ever club sides in world in the process. Rangers self inflicted decline had nothing to do with Lennon.
seanfhear
24/01/2024, 11:44 AM
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/bolton-wanderers-boss-neil-lennon-7075826
Even if they just do the most basic due dilligence on him I can't see how the FAI can appoint Neil Lennon. If they do, they deserve everything coming their way.Going by that he may be " too busy " for the Irish job ! ! !
Diggs246
24/01/2024, 11:49 AM
He got Celtic out of the group stages of the CL. Is that not "competition"? Beating one of the best ever club sides in world in the process. Rangers self inflicted decline had nothing to do with Lennon.
In fairness the SPL is a two horse race. If one horse basically isn't running, then success of the league win is very significantly diminished in its achievement.
Diggs246
24/01/2024, 11:51 AM
Btw if Carsley pulls out
I can see the fai at least meeting Roy Keane.
They know he will bring trouble, but he will also bring a sponsor deal.
My guess is he won't agree personally terms regardless
brine3
24/01/2024, 11:56 AM
When Rangers were out of the running for a decade or so, Celtic had an enormous opportunity to invest in youth football, a football philosophy from the ground up and canny scouting, all without having to worry too much about not winning the league. Instead they just kept going down the journeyman football route. Missed opportunity.
Jolly Red Giant
24/01/2024, 12:23 PM
He got Celtic out of the group stages of the CL. Is that not "competition"? Beating one of the best ever club sides in world in the process. Rangers self inflicted decline had nothing to do with Lennon.
One swallow doesn't make a summer - and while Barcelona were one of the best club sides, their team that year was not particularly good - they were later hammered 7-0 on agg by Bayern Munich (and Celtic were hammered by Juventus in the last 16). The following year Celtic were in the same group again with Barcelona, Barca hammered them 6-1 in a group game and they finished a distant bottom of the group
As for Rangers - no it had nothing to do with Lennon - but Lennon was able to take advantage of the fact that in 2012-13 Rangers were in the Scottish Third Division and the following year in Scottish League One - it is 40 years since a club other than Celtic or Rangers won the Scottish title - when your only competition is playing in a different division then even the likes of Stephen Kenny could have won the title (hell even I could have won the title as Celtic manager during those seasons). During the only season where Rangers weren't imploding - 2010-11 - Rangers won the title. He was an utter disaster with Bolton and with Omonia Nicosia. In his second stint at Celtic, Rodgers had pretty much wrapped up the title when Lennon took over - the following year Celtic were awarded the title during the lockdown and his last year there Celtic imploded, in larger part to Lennon's antics and he was sacked in Feb of that season with Celtic already 20 points behind Rangers.
The fact that he is not anything remotely approaching a competent manager should rule him out - the fact that he is a scumbag who threatened to slit the throat of a woman he was in a relationship with should automatically exclude him from any consideration. He was 45 at the time and the woman was 24 - and after Lennon made the threat, he attempted to intimidate her hounding her with legal writs, he got his friends to harass her, he attempted to gag the media and then told the cops he was the victim and she was blackmailing him (despite the fact that she had already told his long term partner of the affair) - and then when he finally admitted it he made a mealy mouthed apology in order to save his job at Bolton (who should have sacked him on the spot).
Jolly Red Giant
24/01/2024, 12:34 PM
Btw if Carsley pulls out
I can see the fai at least meeting Roy Keane.
They know he will bring trouble, but he will also bring a sponsor deal.
My guess is he won't agree personally terms regardless
On BBC today
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/68074065
Eirambler
24/01/2024, 12:36 PM
Lennon season by season:
2010/11: Lost the league to Rangers
2011/12: Won the league after Rangers entered administration (and were subsequently liquidated at the end of the season)
2012/13: Won the SPL, obviously Rangers weren't in it that year so effectively no competition
2013/14: Won the SPL, again Rangers weren't in it so no genuine competition
2014/15: Finished 18th in the Championship with Bolton
2015/16: Left Bolton in March with the club bottom of the table and in financial difficulty
2016/17: Won the Scottish second tier with Hibs. Hibs had by far the biggest budget in the division.
2017/18: Finished fourth in the SPL with Hibs. Hibs would have had the fourth or fifth biggest budget in the division.
2018/19: Finished fifth in the SPL, 13 points behind fourth.
2019/20: Was suspended by Hibs and subsequently mutually consented following reports of rows and fighting between the manager and other figures at the club. Hibs were ninth of 12 in the league at the time and recovered to seventh after his departure. Returned to Celtic in February to replace Rodgers with the title effectively already in the bag before he arrived.
2020/21: Blew "the ten" in spectacular fashion, finishing 25 points behind Rangers 2.0. Having dismissed him the previous season Hibs finished third in the league.
2021/22: Took over Cypriot side Omonia in March
2022/23: Was sacked by Omonia in October due to poor league results
I'm not seeing any genuine success there, the only success of note has been managing teams who have had a massively superior budget to the others in their division at the time. Whenever it's been a level playing field it's been occasional on par performance and mostly outright failure.
And that's before you take character issues into account which, IMO, should instantly rule him out of contention.
Kingdom
24/01/2024, 12:37 PM
One swallow doesn't make a summer - and while Barcelona were one of the best club sides, their team that year was not particularly good - they were later hammered 7-0 on agg by Bayern Munich (and Celtic were hammered by Juventus in the last 16). The following year Celtic were in the same group again with Barcelona, Barca hammered them 6-1 in a group game and they finished a distant bottom of the group
As for Rangers - no it had nothing to do with Lennon - but Lennon was able to take advantage of the fact that in 2012-13 Rangers were in the Scottish Third Division and the following year in Scottish League One - it is 40 years since a club other than Celtic or Rangers won the Scottish title - when your only competition is playing in a different division then even the likes of Stephen Kenny could have won the title (hell even I could have won the title as Celtic manager during those seasons). During the only season where Rangers weren't imploding - 2010-11 - Rangers won the title. He was an utter disaster with Bolton and with Omonia Nicosia. In his second stint at Celtic, Rodgers had pretty much wrapped up the title when Lennon took over - the following year Celtic were awarded the title during the lockdown and his last year there Celtic imploded, in larger part to Lennon's antics and he was sacked in Feb of that season with Celtic already 20 points behind Rangers.
The fact that he is not anything remotely approaching a competent manager should rule him out - the fact that he is a scumbag who threatened to slit the throat of a woman he was in a relationship with should automatically exclude him from any consideration. He was 45 at the time and the woman was 24 - and after Lennon made the threat, he attempted to intimidate her hounding her with legal writs, he got his friends to harass her, he attempted to gag the media and then told the cops he was the victim and she was blackmailing him (despite the fact that she had already told his long term partner of the affair) - and then when he finally admitted it he made a mealy mouthed apology in order to save his job at Bolton (who should have sacked him on the spot).
So you're saying he has a chance?
Jolly Red Giant
24/01/2024, 12:38 PM
In fairness the SPL is a two horse race. If one horse basically isn't running, then success of the league win is very significantly diminished in its achievement.
Both Celtic and Rangers are suffering because of their domination of Scottish football - despite both being big clubs with big fan bases, they are losing out on the massive TV money floating around football now and because they don't need to be competitive domestically, their ability to compete outside that shpere is greatly reduced.
Eirambler
24/01/2024, 12:42 PM
Both Celtic and Rangers are suffering because of their domination of Scottish football - despite both being big clubs with big fan bases, they are losing out on the massive TV money floating around football now and because they don't need to be competitive domestically, their ability to compete outside that shpere is greatly reduced.
All of which is not really our concern or problem though (other than when they're mismanaging young Irish players). What is relevant though is, whenever it was a straight two way fight between the two big teams in Scotland, Lennon as a manager didn't win once.
Stuttgart88
24/01/2024, 1:48 PM
Lennon season by season:
2010/11: Lost the league to Rangers
2011/12: Won the league after Rangers entered administration (and were subsequently liquidated at the end of the season)
2012/13: Won the SPL, obviously Rangers weren't in it that year so effectively no competition
2013/14: Won the SPL, again Rangers weren't in it so no genuine competition
2014/15: Finished 18th in the Championship with Bolton
2015/16: Left Bolton in March with the club bottom of the table and in financial difficulty
2016/17: Won the Scottish second tier with Hibs. Hibs had by far the biggest budget in the division.
2017/18: Finished fourth in the SPL with Hibs. Hibs would have had the fourth or fifth biggest budget in the division.
2018/19: Finished fifth in the SPL, 13 points behind fourth.
2019/20: Was suspended by Hibs and subsequently mutually consented following reports of rows and fighting between the manager and other figures at the club. Hibs were ninth of 12 in the league at the time and recovered to seventh after his departure. Returned to Celtic in February to replace Rodgers with the title effectively already in the bag before he arrived.
2020/21: Blew "the ten" in spectacular fashion, finishing 25 points behind Rangers 2.0. Having dismissed him the previous season Hibs finished third in the league.
2021/22: Took over Cypriot side Omonia in March
2022/23: Was sacked by Omonia in October due to poor league results
I'm not seeing any genuine success there, the only success of note has been managing teams who have had a massively superior budget to the others in their division at the time. Whenever it's been a level playing field it's been occasional on par performance and mostly outright failure.
And that's before you take character issues into account which, IMO, should instantly rule him out of contention.
What about the cons?
You can just imagine Packie's contribution to the process though. That'd be my worry.
Jd2793
24/01/2024, 2:42 PM
please steer clear of hughton and lennon @FAI
geysir
24/01/2024, 3:17 PM
Well Hughton spoke for himself this evening -
"As a coach I haven't done well in this competition... I take responsibility for this results we have had in this competition"
Throwing away a two goal lead and second place in the group - in injury time - was bad - and the winning goal for Cape Verde in the first game was also in injury time - the one good performance they had was against Egypt and they should have won that game.
I watched their first and 3rd game, I thought they were poor enough in both those games. I had listened to a couple of pre-competition podcasts and the Ghanaian journalist was totally pessimistic about their team's prospects of advancing from the group due to the low quality of the squad.. That said, I thought they were far too cautious in the first game when defending their one goal lead, it did have the odor of an overly cautious coach
geysir
24/01/2024, 8:48 PM
Lennon season by season:
2010/11: Lost the league to Rangers
2011/12: Won the league after Rangers entered administration (and were subsequently liquidated at the end of the season)
2012/13: Won the SPL, obviously Rangers weren't in it that year so effectively no competition
2013/14: Won the SPL, again Rangers weren't in it so no genuine competition
2014/15: Finished 18th in the Championship with Bolton
2015/16: Left Bolton in March with the club bottom of the table and in financial difficulty
2016/17: Won the Scottish second tier with Hibs. Hibs had by far the biggest budget in the division.
2017/18: Finished fourth in the SPL with Hibs. Hibs would have had the fourth or fifth biggest budget in the division.
2018/19: Finished fifth in the SPL, 13 points behind fourth.
2019/20: Was suspended by Hibs and subsequently mutually consented following reports of rows and fighting between the manager and other figures at the club. Hibs were ninth of 12 in the league at the time and recovered to seventh after his departure. Returned to Celtic in February to replace Rodgers with the title effectively already in the bag before he arrived.
2020/21: Blew "the ten" in spectacular fashion, finishing 25 points behind Rangers 2.0. Having dismissed him the previous season Hibs finished third in the league.
2021/22: Took over Cypriot side Omonia in March
2022/23: Was sacked by Omonia in October due to poor league results
I'm not seeing any genuine success there, the only success of note has been managing teams who have had a massively superior budget to the others in their division at the time. Whenever it's been a level playing field it's been occasional on par performance and mostly outright failure.
And that's before you take character issues into account which, IMO, should instantly rule him out of contention.
I don't think Lennon has the credentials for the Ireland job, at least not since his departure from Bolton but your timeline synopsis and add on comments lack both objectivity and sensibility
He took over a Celtic in complete disarray and most Celtic fans loved that first season. 2nd season after an awful start, he turned it around and were clear by the new year. A mixed EL campaign laid some optimism.
3rd season you write 'no Rangers' and conveniently ignore Celtic's best (ever?) season in the CL and imo had a 50/ 50 chance of getting to the 1/4s had effin' Ambrose stayed in Africa and celebrated with Nigeria.
In october he took over a Bolton team that had already looked dead and buried in the championship, the club was financially bankrupt and sanctioned. Bolton could only sign (on low wages) players on a free or loanees. In a stunning turnaround the club easily avoided relegation with games to play and perhaps he should have left then as the club was still in dire straights going into the next season
You write about 'character issues', what on earth are you alluding to? Neil is genuinely well respected in the game by players, managers and his rivals. Perhaps you confused the term character with personality as it is well known he has gone public with his chronic personality disorder issues. But if we were to dismiss a manager's credentials because of 'personality issues', who would be left standing? Take Roy Keane, if he were good enough and got results I would put his obvious personality issues as being a marginal issue, but he's not good enough and would not get the results.
Jolly Red Giant
24/01/2024, 10:41 PM
You write about 'character issues', what on earth are you alluding to?
You seriously don't know - and clearly haven't read the last few comments on here - or are you willing to ignore the fact that he threatened a woman with bodily harm and subsequently engaged in harassment and intimidation of the same woman and then lied to the cops about her.
Neil is genuinely well respected in the game by players, managers and his rivals.
Really - evidence - because we certainly have evidence to the opposite - Lennon and his assistant at Hibs, Gary Parker, hurled foul and aggressive language during a team meeting. This was on top of him publicly criticising individual players in the media. The team meeting was followed by a loud and angry meeting with the Chief Executive who Lennon claimed refused to back him to the hilt against the players. Lennon was sacked because pretty much the entire squad refused to play for him and they told the Chief Executive so.
Perhaps you confused the term character with personality as it is well known he has gone public with his chronic personality disorder issues.
Not an excuse for threatening a woman with bodily harm
But if we were to dismiss a manager's credentials because of 'personality issues', who would be left standing? Take Roy Keane, if he were good enough and got results I would put his obvious personality issues as being a marginal issue, but he's not good enough and would not get the results.
I will tell you one person who would be left standing - Chris Hughton - a person in football that no one has ever ushered a harsh word about, because he treats people as adults and with respect.
It astonishes me that, where ever the media are getting their information, Chris Hughton has been summarily dismissed as a potential candidate for the job - while the likes of Neil Lennon is still regarded as a strong candidate. If that is an FAI leak then those making the decision should hang their heads in shame.
I have zero problem with Chris Hughton not getting the job - but if Neil Lennon is hired then it would be a far worse decision than hiring Steve Staunton and Stephen Kenny combined - and it would become a disaster very quickly. It will manifest itself firstly in a host of underage players deciding to declare for other countries because they would not want to play for the guy. A hyena does not change its spots.
Olé Olé
25/01/2024, 5:04 AM
I think the stuff about Lennon being liked within the FAI for the job is primarily coming from Paul Rowan. Rowan also was driving stuff about Kenny not having too many fans within the FAI while he was in the job. In both situations, he has referenced Packie Bonner supporting the former and Packie Bonner not supporting the latter. It feels to me like Rowan is the one keeping Lennon relevant to all of this.
I see Roy Keane's showing interest the last few days. He'd be as good as Lennon.
If it's not Carsley then there would want to be a rabbit coming from a hat. Lennon and Hughton are on the way down in their managerial careers. It would make no sense, surely. Also, there must be something to be read into Kilbane ramping up the articles of Carsley's fit for the gig. Has he had two in the last two weeks? Don't think that is a coincidence.
Eirambler
25/01/2024, 6:59 AM
I don't think Lennon has the credentials for the Ireland job, at least not since his departure from Bolton but your timeline synopsis and add on comments lack both objectivity and sensibility
He took over a Celtic in complete disarray and most Celtic fans loved that first season. 2nd season after an awful start, he turned it around and were clear by the new year. A mixed EL campaign laid some optimism.
3rd season you write 'no Rangers' and conveniently ignore Celtic's best (ever?) season in the CL and imo had a 50/ 50 chance of getting to the 1/4s had effin' Ambrose stayed in Africa and celebrated with Nigeria.
In october he took over a Bolton team that had already looked dead and buried in the championship, the club was financially bankrupt and sanctioned. Bolton could only sign (on low wages) players on a free or loanees. In a stunning turnaround the club easily avoided relegation with games to play and perhaps he should have left then as the club was still in dire straights going into the next season
You write about 'character issues', what on earth are you alluding to? Neil is genuinely well respected in the game by players, managers and his rivals. Perhaps you confused the term character with personality as it is well known he has gone public with his chronic personality disorder issues. But if we were to dismiss a manager's credentials because of 'personality issues', who would be left standing? Take Roy Keane, if he were good enough and got results I would put his obvious personality issues as being a marginal issue, but he's not good enough and would not get the results.
Trust me Geysir, when I say character I absolutely mean character.
As for his much hyped Champions League run, which seems to be brought up a lot by those that like him (possibly because there's not much else to use in his defence), it may just be me but scraping through a Champions League group ahead of Benfica and Spartak Moscow while enjoying the significant advantage of not having to worry too much about weekend league games either side of midweek Champions League matches, because everyone knew they basically couldn't lose the league anyway, doesn't seem like too much of an achievement to me.
As an aside, when he was Hibs manager, every week they won a game he was out standing in front of the media afterwards taking all the credit for it. When they lost he used to send out Garry Parker in his place. Towards the end when the wheels had completely come off, Parker was being sent out after pretty much every game. I thought it said a lot about Lennon.
EAFC_rdfl
25/01/2024, 8:50 AM
Great to see Ghana using the word fired - too much PC nonsense these days when managers get the boot. Mutual agreement my eye!
seanfhear
25/01/2024, 9:18 AM
With Robbie Keane after winning a trophy ? !
Eirambler
25/01/2024, 10:17 AM
Owen Cowzer calling it for Carsley.
I, for one, welcome our new folically challenged overlord.
Maybe the whole Lennon thing was just a clever ruse by the suits to get everyone on board with Carsley. A kind of "here's the horror show alternative you could have had, so let's all get behind Lee" thing. If it was then it worked!
MylesNotMiley
25/01/2024, 11:00 AM
If they are as good as mates as everyone is making out - there is no way Kilbane pens that article at the weekend without Carsley's blessing.
Carsely wants it and it's up to the FAI to offer him a decent package to get it over the line. Will the English FA be due any compensation?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.