Log in

View Full Version : 3 tier league



Pages : 1 2 [3] 4

marinobohs
16/10/2019, 10:13 AM
TV like more regular "big matches" Super Sunday etc etc and a top six playing off against each other for the league and euro places could offer more meaningful matches and less walkovers.
An 8 team middle section with top 4 promoted and bottom 4 going down is an extended promotion / relegation play off and this particular section could easily see crowds increase as everyone scraps for positions.
the bottom section is a dead rubber but the bottom 6 teams in the first division have crowds so low that they would have a negligible impact on overall attendances.

Is this the solution to the main problems in the league 100% no .....but of the rejigs put forward it has as much merit and probably more than most.
No one could argue that the current scenerio is good for players or clubs , repeated Friday/Monday/Friday fixtures, midweek games that attract small crowds, close season of 6 months for the first division......the list go's on.
In the absence of the real problems being addressed and i can't see much hope of that anytime soon , worth considering other things.
Can’t get TV coverage now (or limited) but they will be queuing up to pay for same 6 teams playing each other every second week ? Who exactly will be in this “bidding war” for TV rights ?
Clubs will downscale budgets (except maybe top 2) to allow for potential loss of bigger gates/games. How will that improve teams (other than top 2) ?
Half the League promoted/relegated every year is not exciting it’s confusing. Any novelty would disappear after one season - a continuous multi season relegation battle is not the attraction for fans/investors/ anyone that you appear to think.
Jettisoning half of the first division before it even starts? Progress ?
So, apart from a handful of clubs at the top of the first the proposal offers little if anything.

Sorry to appear so negative but still waiting to hear one reason to see this as positive.

pineapple stu
16/10/2019, 10:40 AM
Add in too the fact that for 8 teams, their points would have to be reset halfway through the season under one proposal.

"A huge six-pointer...until the points get docked" just doesn't have the same ring to it

Mr A
16/10/2019, 10:48 AM
That's the killer for me. Harps and UCD knew from fairly early on this year that we would likely be the bottom two, and neither had a realistic chance of making the top 6- meaning we would have an entire home and away series that was effectively meaningless as we waited for the second section of the season.

Equally a good start in the first division and a club could skate home for a long enough section. Am not sure the format would reduce dead rubbers at all. If there was some fair formula of carrying over points it might, but that would be messy enough as well.

Real ale Madrid
16/10/2019, 11:59 AM
To use the championship in England as a (bad) example.

The Current TV Rights deal is worth €685m Euros (£595). £119m/€137m per season.
There are 15 playoff games - which is roughly 8% of the total fixtures.
Can we assume that the Football league playoffs are worth 8% of that TV revenue €10.96m per year?

If Lucid can negotiate a TV deal for the league of Ireland worth (finger in the air) €10m over 5 years. No sniggering.
With a Championship Playoff round does that figure become €11m? Is there monetary value to any potential TV deal for a championship playoff. I use the word potential loosely.

pineapple stu
16/10/2019, 12:51 PM
A play-off and a split are two very different things.

A play-off is 5 games (per division) at the end of a 550-game season to decide one final promotion spot.

A split as proposed (bottom four in the Premier with top four in the First) can render half a season utterly redundant, with all points reset, as I and Mr A have outlined. What's the monetary value of that?

And I'll snigger all I want at Lucid's 10m figure. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush as they say. Let's get 10m for the league now and then look at improving things.

Mr_Parker
16/10/2019, 1:13 PM
https://www.independent.ie/sport/soccer/league-of-ireland/ewan-mackenna-lucid-dreams-irelands-200m-deficit-and-an-ambitious-plan-to-save-irish-football-38585265.html

Excellent explainer of the All-Island League plan here. Hard to say it lacks detailed research, just a case of having the funds to back it up and make it viable!

As predicted, here comes the PR spin and reading through this thread some are already falling for it, including the journalist who wrote it.

It certainly isn't an "excellent explainer" as ThirdManRun claims.

I found it hard to get past the journalist stating "when you shackle its even more debilitated brother, the NIFL Premiership, to it". To claim that the NIFL premiership is even in a worse state than the LOI is quite frankly laughable.

Then Lucid uses what a former chairman of Glentoran once said and discussions he had with him as providing the starting point etc is frightening. At that point in time, Glentoran were facing going to the wall, and were desperate to grasp any straw. Ask any Glentoran fan about Ralph.

However, the part to take from that interview paragraph is this.

"I'm very careful how I choose my words here," he says. "The IFA were cool on the idea, that would be the word. They need to see more meat on the bone and that's a phrase they use very regularly." At least they've taken the bone via a few meetings and that's more than many envisaged. Besides, why not as there's a benefit beyond just money, with Lucid talking about better pathways for players, thus better national teams."

Why does he need to be careful in what he says? Would it be that far from being cool on the idea, they were closer to being at -1oC?

A bone has substance. Nothing that has been put forward has substance, so to suggest that there something to put meat on is nonsense.

Pathways for players and better national teams? Really, the IFA are going to support something that in reality would damage everything the IFA have being doing in the last number of years to stem players from declaring for the South!


Let's not get carried away.

sbgawa
16/10/2019, 2:10 PM
Can’t get TV coverage now (or limited) but they will be queuing up to pay for same 6 teams playing each other every second week ? Who exactly will be in this “bidding war” for TV rights ?
Clubs will downscale budgets (except maybe top 2) to allow for potential loss of bigger gates/games. How will that improve teams (other than top 2) ?
Half the League promoted/relegated every year is not exciting it’s confusing. Any novelty would disappear after one season - a continuous multi season relegation battle is not the attraction for fans/investors/ anyone that you appear to think.
Jettisoning half of the first division before it even starts? Progress ?
So, apart from a handful of clubs at the top of the first the proposal offers little if anything.

Sorry to appear so negative but still waiting to hear one reason to see this as positive.

No problem with you being negative, i'm only borderline positive myself on this if even.
I'm not saying there would be a Q of TV companies just that in terms of attractiveness matches between the biggest teams are "more" attractive so it has to be a plus ...
Attendances are arguable, would Harps or UCD attract more people to their matches against Derry and Cork when they are bottom 2 in the current setup or for the visit of Longford and Drogheda where a win might keep them up if they were pushing for top 4 in the new Div 1.....i will bow to Mr A or Stu on that one
Either way none of this matters unless the FAI start getting money in from the Govt and can afford to start investing in the league.

marinobohs
16/10/2019, 3:20 PM
No problem with you being negative, i'm only borderline positive myself on this if even.
I'm not saying there would be a Q of TV companies just that in terms of attractiveness matches between the biggest teams are "more" attractive so it has to be a plus ...
Attendances are arguable, would Harps or UCD attract more people to their matches against Derry and Cork when they are bottom 2 in the current setup or for the visit of Longford and Drogheda where a win might keep them up if they were pushing for top 4 in the new Div 1.....i will bow to Mr A or Stu on that one
Either way none of this matters unless the FAI start getting money in from the Govt and can afford to start investing in the league.

Agreed, bottom line is the need for real investment and a centralised plan on how to develop the League over the next 5-10 years. Maybe the largesse previously wasted on JD and his payment package will be better spent on developing the league, possibly by covering registration fees to some extent ? I understand the current fees to be ridiculously out of proportion to potential winnings.

Personally I would like to see 2 X 10 team divisions (I would like 12 per Division but just don't think there is sufficient clubs currently available). home/away fixtures against each of the other 9 clubs + cup games. Stick with this simplified structure and work on the promotional side with a centralised FAI approach to promote the League (clubs still free to do their own promotion). financial support, where available, in the first instance to League wide initiatives.

I believe a strong, stable and well promoted league has more chance of getting some TV coverage (and hopefully a deal) than a convoluted mish mash structure. As mentioned earlier I think the 'threat' of relegation would have a negative effect on clubs seeking new investment or fans and I am not sure the potential carrot of promotion would have an equal offsetting effect for First Division clubs.


Anyway, no doubt we will be having a similar conversation in 2/3 years when the next masterplan is unveiled :D

ashbournebohs
16/10/2019, 3:56 PM
I'm going to throw my tuppence worth in . If the clubs are hell bent on a restructure i would be in the camp of and all island league which in my opinion we should not rush. Let the North change calendar first which they are doing and run a cross border All Island Cup first to test the water. A possible sponsor is already out there in the unite the the union cup.
I think we need to wait to see if Brexit poses many obstacles first and if the clubs go for it it should be about building a 15/16/18 club full time professional league .
Then and only then can we talk to TV companies . As it stands the league is too condensed . As far as a TV deal goes we may have to wait until the national team rights are up again as that seems to be the only leverage we have and it should be used properly and on our terms . Assuming Virgin and RTE are bidding we really need to put a value on our own leagues TV deal with strict criteria . Say for example its Ireland internationals for a four year deal at 8m (i havnt a clue re figures) Well then it becomes 10 million for the 4 years and 2 mill forms the League broadcast rights . We decide the amount of games that suits the league structure (sometimes less is more) and we insist on a proper behind the scenes type MOTD programme. Streaming games is explored and the clubs control their own highlights as in social media etc . And if the TV company do not fulfill the contract , a penalty is invoked. 500k per year goes into the prize pot. Seems like pie in the Sky but i feel that the bigger TV companies wont want to loose out on International games . Sell the rights to the FAI cup separately as i feel it is lumped in and has no value . I'm sure i am way off on figures but i think a summer league has great potential for TV rights. Our FAI just happened to give them away for free and i know that previously RTE had to be forced to show LOI but if thats the case give them and the international rights to its competitor.

As for the current league i think the Sponsorship is way way off for its title sponsor, reportedly 250k a year. Some clubs alone can get a third of that for a jersey deal so work it out yourself re the amount of publicity Airtricity gets.

As for the structure of the current league i think 2 main issues need addressing. Marketing and scheduling. The second one is an easy fix. Make the season 4 weeks longer on the back of player welfare and make the EA cup first an second round - pre season fixtures . That would eliminate midweek games somewhat . If we have to have them keep them local .
Marketing should be a priority . It needs money but why not ring fence a 5% levy of Euro prize money for a marketing and development budget
Worth thinking about . Plenty right with the league and i personally think a split of whats there at the moment will do more long term harm than good

Mr_Parker
16/10/2019, 4:45 PM
Let the North change calendar first which they are doing*

Not true. No decision has been taken to alter our season.

ThirdManRun
16/10/2019, 4:52 PM
As predicted, here comes the PR spin and reading through this thread some are already falling for it, including the journalist who wrote it.

It certainly isn't an "excellent explainer" as ThirdManRun claims.

I found it hard to get past the journalist stating "when you shackle its even more debilitated brother, the NIFL Premiership, to it". To claim that the NIFL premiership is even in a worse state than the LOI is quite frankly laughable.

Then Lucid uses what a former chairman of Glentoran once said and discussions he had with him as providing the starting point etc is frightening. At that point in time, Glentoran were facing going to the wall, and were desperate to grasp any straw. Ask any Glentoran fan about Ralph.

However, the part to take from that interview paragraph is this.

"I'm very careful how I choose my words here," he says. "The IFA were cool on the idea, that would be the word. They need to see more meat on the bone and that's a phrase they use very regularly." At least they've taken the bone via a few meetings and that's more than many envisaged. Besides, why not as there's a benefit beyond just money, with Lucid talking about better pathways for players, thus better national teams."

Why does he need to be careful in what he says? Would it be that far from being cool on the idea, they were closer to being at -1oC?

A bone has substance. Nothing that has been put forward has substance, so to suggest that there something to put meat on is nonsense.

Pathways for players and better national teams? Really, the IFA are going to support something that in reality would damage everything the IFA have being doing in the last number of years to stem players from declaring for the South!


Let's not get carried away.

I found it to be a decent explainer in the sense of the overall format, duration and make up of the plan. I’m not privy to the finer details, which seems dont currently exist.

Personally speaking, the reason I find the proposal to be so appealing is because it offers a fresh landscape for clubs to latch onto and move towards a more professional and sustainable future. Speaking with a pure LOI bias, as I don’t know the inner workings of the NIFL. I’d love to hear opinions on pros/cons from all stake holders in both leagues?

Clubs have come and gone in LOI due to lack of support (ie Kildare/Kilkenny), but if you’re pairing Linfield v Waterford or Bohs v Glentoran, all of a sudden you have new rivalries with large support bases already in place, not to mention dormant or new fans. Surely that has an appeal?

The new academy program UEFA are running up north seems purely based around preparing players to move to England / Scotland, so I don’t think an All-Island League makes it anymore obvious for a player to declare either way, as a large number of players that will reach senior international level will probably never play in the proposed league anyway!

pineapple stu
16/10/2019, 4:56 PM
it offers a fresh landscape for clubs to latch onto and move towards a more professional and sustainable future.
What parts gave you that view?

And what does that sentence actually mean? It sounds like pure marketing speak

ThirdManRun
16/10/2019, 5:01 PM
What parts gave you that view?

And what does that sentence actually mean? It sounds like pure marketing speak

New opponents, new grounds, new players, new coaches, new rivalries between fans.

Playing twice a season at a weekend, versus 4 times a season with a game every 4 days.

Linfield would likely compete with Rovers / Dundalk for the title, so additional title rivals. You would expect a more competitive race for Europe / Relegation battle too.

It’s hardly outlandish to suggest all those factors would lead to a reinvigorated club scene?

pineapple stu
16/10/2019, 5:07 PM
How's that going to happen though?

An AIL is miles away. In any event, any bump of excitement for Sligo fans gained from going to Larne instead of Bray will surely be temporary.

And the split model doesn't really bring any of those things.

ThirdManRun
16/10/2019, 5:47 PM
How's that going to happen though?

An AIL is miles away. In any event, any bump of excitement for Sligo fans gained from going to Larne instead of Bray will surely be temporary.

And the split model doesn't really bring any of those things.

If the All-Island League was to start tomorrow the divisions would line up as :

PREMIER DIVISION

Ballymena, Bohemians, Cliftonville, Coleraine, Cork City, Crusaders, Derry City, Dundalk, Larne, Linfield, Shamrock Rovers, Sligo Rovers, St Patrick's Athletic, Waterford FC,

DIVISION ONE NORTH

Carrick Rangers, Drogheda United, Dungannon Swifts, Finn Harps, Glenavon, Glentoran, Institute, Loughgall, Portadown, Warrenpoint Town

DIVISION ONE SOUTH

Athlone Town, Bray Wanderers, Cabinteely FC, Cobh Ramblers, Galway United, Longford Town, Limerick FC, Shelbourne, UCD, Wexford

Theres a lot more scale to generate interest when there’s a new team rocking into town for a one off home game, rather than playing home and away twice. Again, looking at it with an LOI bias, I would be a lot more interested in seeing new players and teams in a one off game than seeing Rovers v Pats cancel each other out because they’ve played 4 times already.

Mr_Parker
16/10/2019, 7:59 PM
I found it to be a decent explainer in the sense of the overall format, duration and make up of the plan. I’m not privy to the finer details, which seems dont currently exist.

Personally speaking, the reason I find the proposal to be so appealing is because it offers a fresh landscape for clubs to latch onto and move towards a more professional and sustainable future. Speaking with a pure LOI bias, as I don’t know the inner workings of the NIFL. I’d love to hear opinions on pros/cons from all stake holders in both leagues?

Clubs have come and gone in LOI due to lack of support (ie Kildare/Kilkenny), but if you’re pairing Linfield v Waterford or Bohs v Glentoran, all of a sudden you have new rivalries with large support bases already in place, not to mention dormant or new fans. Surely that has an appeal?

The new academy program UEFA are running up north seems purely based around preparing players to move to England / Scotland, so I don’t think an All-Island League makes it anymore obvious for a player to declare either way, as a large number of players that will reach senior international level will probably never play in the proposed league anyway!

Do you not see the conflict in the two parts I have highlighted in your post. There are NO details, let alone finer ones and therefore how can you assume that there will be a "sustainable future".

Large support bases do not support the rational that such will necessarily travel to venues that will more distant. In fact, once the novelty wears off, you could see a decrease. The NIFL Premiership has seen year on growth in attendances and in terms of financial security.

UEFA are not running the new academy. They have provided some funding, that is all. Don't let their PR spin cloud your thinking. The IFA have set it on the back of their CLUB NI programme to try and box off players to help "encourage" players to declare for them. They have also realised, that going forward, less kids will get a chance across the water and need to secure as many of them as possible within their own area.

Nesta99
17/10/2019, 3:31 AM
As predicted, here comes the PR spin and reading through this thread some are already falling for it, including the journalist who wrote it.
.

Ewan MacKenna has a massive following among Dundalk fans for his incredible insights on the finances of the LoI..

Mr_Parker
17/10/2019, 6:34 AM
Ewan MacKenna has a massive following among Dundalk fans for his incredible insights on the finances of the LoI..

And what? Trump has a massive following amongst Americans! :think:

All he has written was a puff piece and while at it has tried to belittle the NIFL Premiership by stating that it is even more debilitated than the LOI, which certainly demonstrates he has little or no insight into the NIFL Premiership and its clubs.

It was hardly a secret to say that a PR push was coming in the run-up to the meeting. McKenna, as will others help push it along, rather than dig deep.

All that glitters.......

Ezeikial
17/10/2019, 6:55 AM
Ewan MacKenna has a massive following among Dundalk fans for his incredible insights on the finances of the LoI..

He was widely derided on Oriel Web for his recent Dundalk/Peak 6 article. Many regard him as a sensationalist 'hot-take' journo who enjoys courting controversy.

He is the antonym for credibility compared to Daniel McDonnell

pineapple stu
17/10/2019, 7:06 AM
Theres a lot more scale to generate interest when there’s a new team rocking into town for a one off home game, rather than playing home and away twice. Again, looking at it with an LOI bias, I would be a lot more interested in seeing new players and teams in a one off game than seeing Rovers v Pats cancel each other out because they’ve played 4 times already.
But the Setanta Cup didn't really indicate that. There was initial interest, and then it faded back to normal, and then the IL teams got bored and pulled out. The Scottish Cup isn't packing them in either, yet it's the same premise.

Why would an AIL - which the IL clubs don't want - be any different?

The point I've been making all along here is that there needs to be a lot analysis more to any decision than "Yerrah, I think Sligo v Larne would be something different sure"

Real ale Madrid
17/10/2019, 8:36 AM
Looking foward to a 12 team AIL Premiership in 2021 with a top 6 bottom 6 split.

I'm surprised MacKenna thinks its a good idea. He hates everything.

sbgawa
17/10/2019, 8:38 AM
Looking foward to a 12 team AIL Premiership in 2021 with a top 6 bottom 6 split.

I'm surprised MacKenna thinks its a good idea. He hates everything.

and the middle two play a cup final for 7th place ? :bigsmile:

NeverFeltBetter
17/10/2019, 9:27 AM
You also need to talk about competitiveness. How many of the NIFL teams would realistically challenge in the top half of a 12 team AIL after a few seasons? How many would wind up in the lower tier? A lot I'd say. Hardly makes it attractive to the north.

I maintain the only way an AIL happens is with political unification.

marinobohs
17/10/2019, 12:18 PM
You also need to talk about competitiveness. How many of the NIFL teams would realistically challenge in the top half of a 12 team AIL after a few seasons? How many would wind up in the lower tier? A lot I'd say. Hardly makes it attractive to the north.

I maintain the only way an AIL happens is with political unification.

An All Ireland league is a long, long way off.That is part of its attraction as it can be sold as a panacea for all the ills of Irish football without really ever having to be tested. Qualification criteria and 'protected places' (guaranteed minimum number of clubs from each League) would need to be agreed both for start and a number of years. European places, Match days, refs, Junior/ intermediate Leagues would al be issues because the main problem would be that neither the IFA or the FAI would be willing to 'go away' and the two International teams.
As the Setanta Cup (and the Tylers All Ireland Cup before that) showed an all Ireland league dimension is not the answer to all the problems, yes, it would be progress and yes it would be desirable but still a long way off. Too be honest I would nearly see political unity as easier to achieve !

sbgawa
17/10/2019, 12:58 PM
Brexit done and dusted the AIL sponsored by Boris Johnson comes ever closer.
To be known commercially as the BJ League

Nesta99
17/10/2019, 1:10 PM
He was widely derided on Oriel Web for his recent Dundalk/Peak 6 article. Many regard him as a sensationalist 'hot-take' journo who enjoys courting controversy.

He is the antonym for credibility compared to Daniel McDonnell

I obviously didnt put enough sneer and in to this post on McKenna to show i had ironic intent!!!

marinobohs
17/10/2019, 2:30 PM
Brexit done and dusted the AIL sponsored by Boris Johnson comes ever closer.
To be known commercially as the BJ League

Hmmmm, maybe a possible replacement for Honest John Delaney ? Ridiculous sense of own importance, staggers from one administrative disaster to the next, fond of ahem, stretching the truth, likes a jar and most relevantly (to the FAI) couldn't organise a **** up in a brewery :cool: (even with FAI credit card)

Martinho II
17/10/2019, 2:59 PM
He was widely derided on Oriel Web for his recent Dundalk/Peak 6 article. Many regard him as a sensationalist 'hot-take' journo who enjoys courting controversy.

He is the antonym for credibility compared to Daniel McDonnell

speaking about Daniel McDonnell he was involved with Oriel Web wasnt he? Was he involved with them for long before he made it as a journo.

seand
17/10/2019, 3:18 PM
speaking about Daniel McDonnell he was involved with Oriel Web wasnt he? Was he involved with them for long before he made it as a journo.

I'm not 100% on the details but he effectively set up Orielweb. Until recently (or possibly still now) you could find his own written reports from the 98-9 relegation season til about 2002. He was one of 2 main men behind the short lived but ever-improving HospitalPass website. Around that time he stepped away from OW as he started at the Star (I think) before moving to the Indo. Over twenty years ago some of that! That's about 6,000 years in internet years!

Martinho II
18/10/2019, 2:21 PM
I'm not 100% on the details but he effectively set up Orielweb. Until recently (or possibly still now) you could find his own written reports from the 98-9 relegation season til about 2002. He was one of 2 main men behind the short lived but ever-improving HospitalPass website. Around that time he stepped away from OW as he started at the Star (I think) before moving to the Indo. Over twenty years ago some of that! That's about 6,000 years in internet years!

yeah came across his name in match reports SeanD in the Star before he moved to the Indo so yeah your dead right!

Nesta99
18/10/2019, 2:40 PM
He saved me a whole heap of hassle asking my folks over a payphone from abroad to go to AERTEL P222 and read me out the results. Prior to that there was nothing online for Dundalk FC. He was about 15 or 16 in the early days travelling the long roads of Division 1 away days and writing up reports, chat forum came soon after iirc and is still often the contrary place today as it was in the days of relegation MkI. 'Fun' times.

Martinho II
19/10/2019, 1:23 PM
He saved me a whole heap of hassle asking my folks over a payphone from abroad to go to AERTEL P222 and read me out the results. Prior to that there was nothing online for Dundalk FC. He was about 15 or 16 in the early days travelling the long roads of Division 1 away days and writing up reports, chat forum came soon after iirc and is still often the contrary place today as it was in the days of relegation MkI. 'Fun' times.

Is DMcD gone off Dundalk altogether as anything I listen to him he seems very neutral when hes talking about Dundalk?

sbgawa
19/10/2019, 1:40 PM
I think he is just being professional.
Con Murphy is the same when commentating on rovers.

Nesta99
19/10/2019, 5:17 PM
Is DMcD gone off Dundalk altogether as anything I listen to him he seems very neutral when hes talking about Dundalk?

He is being pro about his job. Quietly he is a scarred by the past like the rest of us and is enjoying this era - with the same well voiced concerns also!

Mr_Parker
21/10/2019, 7:56 PM
https://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2019/1021/1084789-is-that-the-game-changer-mooney-on-new-league/

marinobohs
22/10/2019, 9:14 AM
https://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2019/1021/1084789-is-that-the-game-changer-mooney-on-new-league/

….So, if the Government(or whomever) would just build an adequate stadium and develop a 'vision' (whatever the hell that is) Limerick, the third biggest city operating in LOI MIGHT be able to sustain a club. Wow, just wow.

I would be more interested to find out what the FAI are actually doing to promote an all Ireland League, or develop the league they currently have - other than say how its up to clubs, partners, Santa Claus to sort. Cliched platitudes of a 'ma's apple pie' view of what football could be is not going to move us forward.

Mr_Parker
22/10/2019, 9:39 AM
….So, if the Government(or whomever) would just build an adequate stadium and develop a 'vision' (whatever the hell that is) Limerick, the third biggest city operating in LOI MIGHT be able to sustain a club. Wow, just wow.

I would be more interested to find out what the FAI are actually doing to promote an all Ireland League, or develop the league they currently have - other than say how its up to clubs, partners, Santa Claus to sort. Cliched platitudes of a 'ma's apple pie' view of what football could be is not going to move us forward.

I think the key message to take from the interview in regards to the LOI going forward is his experienced view is that the clubs need to run the league themselves. However, before they do that they need to put firm structures in place in each club. Much of what he said reminded me of what was done with the the formation of the NIFL when the league in the North move away from the IFA. He certainly gave the impression, that while an AIL might be an asperation, he does not think all the clubs have the structure to operate in and to succeed in such a structure as things stand.

marinobohs
22/10/2019, 10:35 AM
I think the key message to take from the interview in regards to the LOI going forward is his experienced view is that the clubs need to run the league themselves. However, before they do that they need to put firm structures in place in each club. Much of what he said reminded me of what was done with the the formation of the NIFL when the league in the North move away from the IFA. He certainly gave the impression, that while an AIL might be an asperation, he does not think all the clubs have the structure to operate in and to succeed in such a structure as things stand.
I wouldn't disagree with the need for some clubs to 'get their house in order', in fact I would commend it, some of the shenanigans of recent years have been appalling, my problem is the FAI are currently responsible for improving the situation and have done little to improve matters and, in all honesty, added to the farce.

Either the FAI (and its spokesman) should accept they are incapable of doing the job and step back or, put in place a realistic business model to develop the league. platitudes about 'visions', new stadia etc are embarrassing unless in some context where they might actually occur.

Mr_Parker
22/10/2019, 11:27 AM
I wouldn't disagree with the need for some clubs to 'get their house in order', in fact I would commend it, some of the shenanigans of recent years have been appalling, my problem is the FAI are currently responsible for improving the situation and have done little to improve matters and, in all honesty, added to the farce.

Either the FAI (and its spokesman) should accept they are incapable of doing the job and step back or, put in place a realistic business model to develop the league. platitudes about 'visions', new stadia etc are embarrassing unless in some context where they might actually occur.

Clubs shouldn't be waiting on the FAI. Their have a wide portfolio of responsibilities and so will never provide the focus on the league that many want. That was very clear from Noel Mooney's interview. Clubs should not be waiting on others. They have the ability to take matters into their own hands.

Mr_Parker
22/10/2019, 11:28 AM
A tweet this morning from the Chairman of Cliftonville.

"@GerardLawlorCFC: Lots of media & PR around an All Ireland league, I find the current proposals lack substance and are unrealistic, some of our southern clubs joining @OfficialNIFL could be a way forward, we in the north have a very progressive league and we should be weary of tampering with it."

pineapple stu
22/10/2019, 11:52 AM
Not entirely sure how anything in the North can be called progressive tbh.

The league maybe punches above its weight in terms of population when you look at crowds (especially away support) and facilities. But the standard is poor, technique hardly seems a consideration in coaching at all, and losing an entire European place is not something progressive leagues do.

That said, I don't blame him at all suggesting the current AIL proposals are too vague for consideration

ashbournebohs
22/10/2019, 12:52 PM
Team Total Attendance No. Attendances Recorded Average Attendance
Ards 10753 19 566
Ballymena United 27969 20 1398
Cliftonville 24677 20 1234
Coleraine 26946 18 1497
Crusaders 22299 16 1394
Dungannon Swifts 12255 19 645
Glenavon 23999 20 1200
Glentoran 28525 18 1585
Institute 7705 19 406
Linfield 45410 19 2390
Newry City 12601 20 630
Warrenpoint Town 5203 20 260


Found these figures for last season up north average attendances .
Our league performs much better but population has to be taken in to account somewhat

Mr A
22/10/2019, 12:56 PM
Facilities and attendances have been improving steadily in the Irish League and they have had massively fewer club meltdowns in recent times. I can see why they would look at the LOI and wonder what would be in it for them.

ashbournebohs
22/10/2019, 1:00 PM
I think they have had fewer basket case clubs as they historicaly never chased the European dream so to speak. That may change with the increase in Euro money

Martinho II
22/10/2019, 1:43 PM
I didnt know with this AIL that the FAI and IFA would still operate. How could this be? I know for 31 years until this states foundation in 1921 there was an AIL but under the NI jurisdiction so cant blame the IFA for doing this!

Mr_Parker
22/10/2019, 3:23 PM
I think they have had fewer basket case clubs as they historicaly never chased the European dream so to speak. That may change with the increase in Euro money

Historical they did. Several clubs got into serious problems. However the nettle was grasped many years ago and mechanisms were put in place to negate such problems arising again.

Facilities on and off the pitch have steadily improved, with more planned changes in the pipeline, once we get a government back. Attendances have been rising year on year for many years now. We have at least 16 live tv games. A results show on Satuday. An online highlights show. Various podcasts as well as good newspaper exposure. NIFL clubs have every right to have a positive outlook and rightly be cautious of a project that at this time lacks clarity and has little substance.

Mr_Parker
22/10/2019, 3:52 PM
Interview with the Chair of Cliftonville on his views of an AIL

https://www.belfastlive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/cliftonville-chairman-gerard-lawlor-labels-17126488

Mr_Parker
22/10/2019, 5:44 PM
Team Total Attendance No. Attendances Recorded Average Attendance
Ards 10753 19 566
Ballymena United 27969 20 1398
Cliftonville 24677 20 1234
Coleraine 26946 18 1497
Crusaders 22299 16 1394
Dungannon Swifts 12255 19 645
Glenavon 23999 20 1200
Glentoran 28525 18 1585
Institute 7705 19 406
Linfield 45410 19 2390
Newry City 12601 20 630
Warrenpoint Town 5203 20 260


Found these figures for last season up north average attendances .
Our league performs much better but population has to be taken in to account somewhat

You are right to say population should be taken into account. Based on the average LOI attendance as given in another thread on this forum, 0.22% of the population go to a LOI over a round of fixtures. NIFL attendances, based on the current average attendances are 0.4% of the population. Not sure it can be claimed that the LOI performs better on that basis.

pineapple stu
22/10/2019, 6:06 PM
Yeah, basically the population of the North is roughly one-third what it is here, so attendances should be one-third as well.

That'd be one team pulling 7k average, and four more pulling in 4k+

Not happening obviously

ashbournebohs
22/10/2019, 6:25 PM
Yeah, basically the population of the North is roughly one-third what it is here, so attendances should be one-third as well.

That'd be one team pulling 7k average, and four more pulling in 4k+

Not happening obviously

Its a factor but not entirely relevant .For example how many then conversly should be attending football in China Russia etc etc .I know they are vastly more populated but to say attendances should be x % greater is true . Also the strength of the sport as an industry and a lot of other variables