pete
18/02/2002, 5:24 PM
from a2zsoccer.com
The High Court has ruled against Shelbourne Football Club who argued that the appointment of the arbiter in the Paul Marney affair was incorrect.
Counsel for Shelbourne had also argued that the subsequent arbitration process was unsound.
the Drumcondra club had also argued that a senior St Patrick's Athletic official had admitted to a League administrator that they had never posted any registration for Marney by any form of mail.
It now seems likely that the FAI will have to cover half of the court's costs and that Shelbourne will have to cover the other half.
Shelbourne still have the option of taking their case to FIFA.
The High Court has ruled against Shelbourne Football Club who argued that the appointment of the arbiter in the Paul Marney affair was incorrect.
Counsel for Shelbourne had also argued that the subsequent arbitration process was unsound.
the Drumcondra club had also argued that a senior St Patrick's Athletic official had admitted to a League administrator that they had never posted any registration for Marney by any form of mail.
It now seems likely that the FAI will have to cover half of the court's costs and that Shelbourne will have to cover the other half.
Shelbourne still have the option of taking their case to FIFA.