How accurate is this?

[Xlex]

PREMIER 2004
Shels...........2.2m (21 FT players, 10 FT Admin & coaching staff)
Bohs...........1.8m (18, 10)
Cork............1.2m (16, 3)
Drogs..........1.1m (13, 6)
Pat's...........950k (17, 12)
Rovers........850k (7, 3)
Longford......775k (4, 0)
Derry..........750k (10, 4)
Waterford....600k (6, 4)
Dublin C.......450k est (3, 1)

It's a copy/paste job from the Rovers website. Basically, we're the only club with no full-time Admin. I think it's time to change and although I know it's a requirement in the club licencing I would like to see a full-time marketing person in. Someone to bring in the revenue and to introduce methods of getting a crowd through the door. This is no reflection on the job being done by the man at the moment.

It really is amazing whats being done by the people at the coalface of LTFC.

Who's the four full-timers? Baker and Keegan?

[Longfordian]

Baker isn't FT as far as I know, FT being in our case 52 weeks..Not too sure, Barry probably, maybe Dillo, Kirby since his new deal id say..Someone is going to be employed on the admin side in the new year from what i hear. I agree we need a marketing person but they'd have to be employed largely on commission and there's not a lot of top candidates would do that

[max power]

Baker isn't FT as far as I know, FT being in our case 52 weeks..Not too sure, Barry probably, maybe Dillo, Kirby since his new deal id say..Someone is going to be employed on the admin side in the new year from what i hear. I agree we need a marketing person but they'd have to be employed largely on commission and there's not a lot of top candidates would do that

a marketing committee sharing the burden would be an idea, once they were all workin in the same direction

[max power]

[QUOTE=Xlex]

It really is amazing whats being done by the people at the coalface of LTFC.

QUOTE]

as i said in another thread, wonder how much more could be done if more people got involved........no rant.

[fosterdollar]

PREMIER 2004
Shels...........2.2m (21 FT players, 10 FT Admin & coaching staff)
Bohs...........1.8m (18, 10)
Cork............1.2m (16, 3)
Drogs..........1.1m (13, 6)
Pat's...........950k (17, 12)
Rovers........850k (7, 3)
Longford......775k (4, 0)
Derry..........750k (10, 4)
Waterford....600k (6, 4)
Dublin C.......450k est (3, 1)


What are the money figures? Wage bills? Club Value? Club income? If they represent wages then we are getting poor value for money. Of course, the opposite is true if they represent club incoming funds

[Macy]

What are the money figures? Wage bills? Club Value? Club income? If they represent wages then we are getting poor value for money. Of course, the opposite is true if they represent club incoming funds
Money is turnover afaik. Doesn't actually show a lot if that is the case - profit or loss, or even revenue would be better indicators.

[Longfordian]

Not too sure where those figures came from..Some say the Licensing application but all that informaton is supposed to be confidential. It's supposed to be each club's turnover, as far as I know no-one from LTFC gave any official figures out

[max power]

our required budget for this season is bout 750k.....no total turnover.

[Longfordian]

Well obviously there is a total turnover, there has to be in all accounts but it wasn't released to the newspaper anyway. But €750k would be about the total running cost of the club alright