PDA

View Full Version : They think it's all over......



liam88
18/10/2004, 5:44 PM
Endgame? (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/3754160.stm)

Can see it happening myself
Though if the Conservatives get into power in ingurland next year might hit the rocks.....

liam88
18/10/2004, 6:12 PM
When in power they have been pretty much the same as the Tories though.
Probably to young to be getting into this but Labour pulled off the GFA didn't they?
Major ceasfires, RIRA disbanding, no more soldiers being killed since Labour got in i guess.

TheJamaicanP.M.
18/10/2004, 6:44 PM
Probably to young to be getting into this but Labour pulled off the GFA didn't they?
Major ceasfires, RIRA disbanding, no more soldiers being killed since Labour got in i guess.

Have to agree with you there Liam. A Labour government would certainly suit Ireland best. The Conservatives have a history of being a nuisance with regard to this country. John Major wasn't the worse, but I'd like to see Labour in power for the forseeable future.

Macy
19/10/2004, 7:43 AM
Have to agree with you there Liam. A Labour government would certainly suit Ireland best. The Conservatives have a history of being a nuisance with regard to this country. John Major wasn't the worse, but I'd like to see Labour in power for the forseeable future.
I'd love to see a Labour Government in power in the UK. We'll be a long time waiting with two sets of tory bástards fighting it out.....

John Major did a hell of a lot of work, but ultimately wouldn't take the final step as he was relying on the UUP to prop up his Government. Personally I think he should've taken the final step, as he was always going to lose to El Presidiente anyway. History would've remembered him better.

Peadar
19/10/2004, 8:00 AM
History would've remembered him better.

He'll be forever remembered for his wonderful performances in the hit TV show, Spitting Image. :D

sylvo
19/10/2004, 8:22 AM
[QUOTE=Conor74, remember a lot of stuff in the 80s when Red Ken was inviting Gerry Adams to London and Kevin Callaghan wanted the Birmingham 6 released etc. etc.


They were'nt acting on behalf of the labour party. Red Ken invited Gerry Adams off his own back while head of the GLC, likewise the campaign to free the Birmingham 6.

joeSoap
19/10/2004, 8:24 AM
Sounds like a whole lot of spin to me...what odds on "talks breaking down" over the next few weeks because of gobdaws like Peter Robinson or Martin McGuinness :mad:

Macy
19/10/2004, 8:46 AM
He'll be forever remembered for his wonderful performances in the hit TV show, Spitting Image. :D
"these peas are nice" :D

Schumi
19/10/2004, 10:56 AM
A breakthrough in the Northern Ireland political process may be just weeks away, the secretary of state has said. Three or four weeks probably.

green goblin
19/10/2004, 11:28 AM
He'll be forever remembered for his wonderful performances in the hit TV show, Spitting Image. :D
Remember the one where he smoked a joint by mistake?
"Norma, the sky! It's full of colours! There's grey and... another grey. And a new, different sort of grey!" :D

Comedy aside, I'm crossing my fingers that we will get this sorted once and for all.

Lovely true story the book by Andrew Rawnsely on New Labour, where Gerry and Martin go to No 10. Sitting at the big table, Adams says "I suppose this is the table where Michael Collins sat downwith the government of the day".
"I suppose it is", says Blair. And there's a silence as everyone realises the enormity of the situation, and whereas before things were going so well, suddenly things are a bit awkward.
Quick as a flash, Mo Mowlem breaks the ice by quipping "And those are the french windows where the mortar came in through the garden", and everyone bursts out laughing. She was marvelous. Remember seeing the first time she got too hot and took her wig off at a press conference.

dortie
19/10/2004, 11:31 AM
Probably to young to be getting into this but Labour pulled off the GFA didn't they?
Major ceasfires, RIRA disbanding, no more soldiers being killed since Labour got in i guess.


Labour were not Individually responsible for the Belfast Agreement.
And the RIRA are not disbanded.

dortie
19/10/2004, 11:33 AM
Sounds like a whole lot of spin to me...what odds on "talks breaking down" over the next few weeks because of gobdaws like Peter Robinson or Martin McGuinness :mad:

Dont think you can blame McGuinness for anything considering the DUP basically want to go back to gerrymandering.

liam88
19/10/2004, 6:06 PM
Labour were not Individually responsible for the Belfast Agreement.
And the RIRA are not disbanded.
Aye sorry for implying GFA was all Labour I know everyone, SF,FF etc. put a lot of hard work in.
What's the general view on SF from the Republic now?
Reading a book re. the RIRA and it states "those who wern't radical enough to join the IRA or Sinn Fein joined Finna Feil"-would this still be true?

sorry for any mistakes-just a young lad getting some knowledge from those a wee bit more experienced ;)

SÓC
19/10/2004, 6:20 PM
"those who wern't radical enough to join the IRA or Sinn Fein joined Finna Feil"-would this still be true?

Depends what you mean by radical really.

Does radical mean killing unarmed members of An Garda? Then publically crying out for their release?

I consider myself very Republician.

That doesnt mean I turn to Semtex/AK-47/baseball bat when things dont go my way/I need a bit of cash/me and my vigo group suspect someone of drug dealing etc etc

Then again the FF Government involved in the GFA did a lot of very radical things, Articles 2&3 included in a effort to get pernment devolution in NI.

Once thats firmly in place its a slippery slope to a United Ireland

liam88
19/10/2004, 8:56 PM
fair juice to ya SOC, cheers for the info-I agree with ya on the 'principals not the methods' front; well put.

A face
19/10/2004, 11:23 PM
Then again the FF Government involved in the GFA did a lot of very radical things, Articles 2&3 included in a effort to get pernment devolution in NI.

Once thats firmly in place its a slippery slope to a United Ireland

I think FF should tell everyone about those very radical things .... they might win back some of the votes they lost to SF !! :D

dortie
20/10/2004, 3:02 PM
Reading a book re. the RIRA and it states "those who wern't radical enough to join the IRA or Sinn Fein joined Finna Feil"-would this still be true?




The same principle exists today. FF steered its republican methods to constitutional politics, those who wished to continue the 'use of force' backed SF.
SF is now going down the route of constitutional politics and those against that are aligning themselves to the RIRA.

History repeating itself as it also did when the Official IRA went down the road of politics and the Provisionals continued with the 'use of force'.

ccfcman
21/10/2004, 7:45 AM
how many times have we heard this though, ya we're feirce colse to a deal etc. im only 19 and for my whole life this is the bs ive heard from up north, what a joke.

Peadar
21/10/2004, 7:51 AM
im only 19 and for my whole life this is the bs ive heard from up north, what a joke.

If you were a few years older you'd have grown up watching Today Tonight asking the same questions over and over. They had me convinced that we were heading for another civil war. Murder in Northern Ireland was a feature of every news programme.
Whatever about the stalemate we're seeing now, at least a lot less people are being killed.

dortie
21/10/2004, 9:10 AM
They think it's all over...... it is now

Be great if it was. Its not.

green goblin
21/10/2004, 9:44 AM
Be great if it was. Its not.
Well perhaps not quite yet. But very, very soon, please God. People are talking about weeks and months rather than decades.

dortie
21/10/2004, 2:36 PM
Well perhaps not quite yet. But very, very soon, please God. People are talking about weeks and months rather than decades.

And what exactly is going to happen in weeks and months ??? The DUP and SF sitting together in a Northern Ireland government ???

If SF try to persuade the IRA to disband do you think the majority of them will say 'Aye sure no bother Gerry and Martin...why not.. sure we have got a new Stormont'

drummerboy
21/10/2004, 3:27 PM
Well at least now they are trying to sort something out by talking. 15 or so years ago, every time you turned on the tv/radio there was another atrocity, which lead to a counter atrocity and it went on week in, week out. Crazy stuff.

Closed Account 2
22/10/2004, 4:09 AM
Don’t think the IRA/Real IRA etc (or for that matter any major terrorist outfit in NI) will ever go back to the level of violence that happened in thru the 70s and 80s. I think the major reasons for this the current status of terrorism. Back in the 80s and early 90s a large amount of the Western (but non-UK) public (esp. in the US), even some governments, tended to view the IRA as "freedom fighters". Indeed many groups which would now be considered terrorists (e.g. Afghani Mujahideen, Central American Contras) were deemed freedom fighters. Basically groups which were broadly speaking Socialist/Communist were considered terrorists (e.g. Italian Red Brigade, German Beider-Mienhoff (spelt wrong)), groups which were anti-socialist/anti-communist were considered freedom fighters (e.g. Afghan Mujahideen, Nicaraguan Contras/Anti-Sandinistas). Groups which were neither (like the IRA) were viewed differently by different countries. Since 9/11 that’s all changed... now almost every group is viewed as a terrorist organisation by the US Government (and most countries). Similarly, having experienced 9/11, many US citizens who might have supported the IRA are now less likely to do so.

There are other reasons too, such as the movement of government towards an EU system of local states/counties having more autonomy. In 15-20 years decisions that affect the people in NI will either be taken in the counties (Fermanagh, Armagh etc) or Brussels; not London or Dublin. Also the generally positive experience of the current lull in violence will make people reluctant to go back to the scenes of the 70s and 80s.

There will probably always be groups called the IRA and UVF etc, but they will end up being more about organised crime, drugs, turf-wars, racketeering, etc and not really concerned with a political ideal/goal. Arguably both have started to drift that way anyway.

dortie
22/10/2004, 8:22 AM
Don’t think the IRA/Real IRA etc (or for that matter any major terrorist outfit in NI) will ever go back to the level of violence that happened in thru the 70s and 80s. I think the major reasons for this the current status of terrorism. Back in the 80s and early 90s a large amount of the Western (but non-UK) public (esp. in the US), even some governments, tended to view the IRA as "freedom fighters". Indeed many groups which would now be considered terrorists (e.g. Afghani Mujahideen, Central American Contras) were deemed freedom fighters. Basically groups which were broadly speaking Socialist/Communist were considered terrorists (e.g. Italian Red Brigade, German Beider-Mienhoff (spelt wrong)), groups which were anti-socialist/anti-communist were considered freedom fighters (e.g. Afghan Mujahideen, Nicaraguan Contras/Anti-Sandinistas). Groups which were neither (like the IRA) were viewed differently by different countries. Since 9/11 that’s all changed... now almost every group is viewed as a terrorist organisation by the US Government (and most countries). Similarly, having experienced 9/11, many US citizens who might have supported the IRA are now less likely to do so.

There are other reasons too, such as the movement of government towards an EU system of local states/counties having more autonomy. In 15-20 years decisions that affect the people in NI will either be taken in the counties (Fermanagh, Armagh etc) or Brussels; not London or Dublin. Also the generally positive experience of the current lull in violence will make people reluctant to go back to the scenes of the 70s and 80s.

There will probably always be groups called the IRA and UVF etc, but they will end up being more about organised crime, drugs, turf-wars, racketeering, etc and not really concerned with a political ideal/goal. Arguably both have started to drift that way anyway.

And your an expert on domestic politics and not biased in the slightest.
As for 9/11....to compare Muslim extremists to the IRA is beyond a Joke. If republican intentions were to kill innocent people there would be very few people living in the North of this country.

green goblin
22/10/2004, 9:00 AM
There will probably always be groups called the IRA and UVF etc, but they will end up being more about organised crime, drugs, turf-wars, racketeering, etc and not really concerned with a political ideal/goal. Arguably both have started to drift that way anyway.

In the forner Soviet Union, former KGB are now running many gangs. The collpase of the established order left a huge void, readily filled by oppurtunists. The same happened, to a greater or lesser extent, in every country that the Brits finally lowered the flag on- the post collonial ruling elites in countries like Uganda, give afair example of how bad it can get.
The war in the North gave some people's lives a dreadful, terrible meaning. Some people, of whatever persuasion, identified themselves as person based solely on where they stood on the issue, and what they were prepared to do about it. A small but significant bunch of people may have trouble adjusting to this, and will find peace, even an uneasy peace, hard to live with.
The drugs thing will do it. Direct Action on Drugs was never a moral crusade, but was about cuting cashflow to the other side. Statin ghr bleedin' obvious, in the post 911 world there's obviously less charidee from misty eyed yanks ready to support the struggle, so the money will have to come from elsewhere too.

Duncan Gardner
22/10/2004, 9:11 AM
Edmundo- if you're talking about 'subsidiarity' (the principle of government being carried out at the most appropriately local level), then it already exists on Fermanagh District Council. They look after parks and empty the bins. They aren't likely to be entrusted with social services funding in the near future. This is mainly because the scale is too small, rather than the ongoing local conflict, mistrust, etc.

That will continue to be run from Belfast and London, not Brussels.

Dortie- you seem to be arguing that because paramilitaries haven't murdered all the innocents, they don't murder innocents. Do explain?

dortie
22/10/2004, 9:16 AM
Dortie- you seem to be arguing that because paramilitaries haven't murdered all the innocents, they don't murder innocents. Do explain?

Never said no innocents were killed, said they never intentionally went out to kill innocents.. if they did there would be 1000 times the numbers of deaths.

My point being....flying a plane full of people into a commercial building is Intentional....!

Duncan Gardner
22/10/2004, 9:25 AM
My point being blowing up La Mon house or Oxford Street (respectively restaurant and bus station, not military camps) was deliberate and planned in the certain knowledge they would kill or injure civilians. Ditto the shootings at Loughinisland or Greysteel, or hundreds of other atrocities we could list.

The main difference to 9/11 is scale, not intent.

dortie
22/10/2004, 9:49 AM
My point being blowing up La Mon house or Oxford Street (respectively restaurant and bus station, not military camps) was deliberate and planned in the certain knowledge they would kill or injure civilians. Ditto the shootings at Loughinisland or Greysteel, or hundreds of other atrocities we could list.

The main difference to 9/11 is scale, not intent.

This being a football forum Im reluctant to get into a post to post debate on both our opinions on the situation here, its obvious yours is entirely opposite to mine.

Only the IRA know the real reasons behind such attacks and their motives for bombing them.

However to classify the IRA with Muslim extremists in the same context is ******. Killing members of the protestant community was never their Intentions in my opinion.. if it was....do you seriously think there would be a protestant estate standing in the North ?

Duncan Gardner
22/10/2004, 9:53 AM
Dortie- PM for ye, OK.

max power
22/10/2004, 9:54 AM
"these peas are nice" :D

when ever i hear his name, that is the only thiing i can think of, that and all grey :D

Peadar
22/10/2004, 10:02 AM
Remember the one where he smoked a joint by mistake?
"Norma, the sky! It's full of colours! There's grey and... another grey. And a new, different sort of grey!" :D

I'm still laughing at that.
Is it available on DVD or anything?
Poor old Norma got an awful doing. :D


when ever i hear his name, that is the only thiing i can think of, that and all grey :D

It was classic stuff alright.
He truely was the "spitting image" of him. :D

SÓC
22/10/2004, 10:41 AM
I dont buy the line that the IRA never intended to kill innocent people.

Blowing up a pub in Guilford was always going to kill innocent people, letting more innocent people go down for it just added to the pain.

Forcing a Civilian Catholic man to drive a JCB full of C4 into a British Army base while his wife and daughter were held hostage at gun point. That man was compleatly innocent yet the IRA in their wisdom decided he should die.

Killing a fellow Irish man Garda McCabe because he had to cheek to try to stop them robbing a Post Office.
Many others as some have highlighted.

Then againt there were IRA attacks that gave very specific warnings which were ignored by some (Canary Warf for one).

They just didnt always have a such a conscience

Fair_play_boy
22/10/2004, 4:01 PM
Cork is about as far away from the North as you can get in Ireland, not only in terms of miles, but in terms of awareness of what it was like. So I am cautious about anything I say, because it is so easy to get it wrong, and disrespect the people you are talking about.
As a child I remember the riots which preceded the arrival of the British army. The night they landed I was in a caravan park in Ardmore in Ratland. The following morning, almost half the caravans had pulled out, basically every one of the UK registered cars was gone.
Since the start of these most recent troubles (there were other periods of bloody slaughter over the centuries) there have been many times when a solution was rumoured. I think that the people in the North have become really guarded about building up hope, and if I lived there, I think I would be the same. If this is the final solution, and god knows the people of the North deserve it, it will be a supreme irony, because it will have come during the DUP's watch. Of all political groups in the North, they were always least likely, IMO, to play any part in a long term solution. No wonder history is so hard to study!

liam88
22/10/2004, 6:55 PM
I dont buy the line that the IRA never intended to kill innocent people.

Blowing up a pub in Guilford was always going to kill innocent people, letting more innocent people go down for it just added to the pain.

Forcing a Civilian Catholic man to drive a JCB full of C4 into a British Army base while his wife and daughter were held hostage at gun point. That man was compleatly innocent yet the IRA in their wisdom decided he should die.

Killing a fellow Irish man Garda McCabe because he had to cheek to try to stop them robbing a Post Office.
Many others as some have highlighted.

Then againt there were IRA attacks that gave very specific warnings which were ignored by some (Canary Warf for one).

They just didnt always have a such a conscience

Like I said before-I was born in 88 so only remember the tail end and never experienced many of the things you guys have.
Ma mam's mate (Catholic) got shot by the IRA for driving a jeep (think through Armagh), I got off a train during a bomb scare, I remember a London bus and Omagh both being bombed as well as the Mortar into MI5; very limited as you'll agree.
So I'm not as experienced to pass judgement but living near Guildford/Aldershot people are still p*ssed about it-sounds like the IRA did some disgusting stuff but you can never take away what the scum did in the Rising Sun Pub.
Only read about that but that was the ultimate low of human action-as was the execution of a 17 year old lad for being a Catholic.#
Can't imagine what it must have been like for victims families seeing their sons/fathers/mothers/siblings/families murders walk cheering out of Long Keash-whatever the persuasion.
As you said though SOC the IRA were awful to-mabye everyone was as bad as each other?
PEace sounds like it's for the best-Easter this year the IRA made a speech commiting themselves to freeing Ireland so really not sure about disbanding now?
Hopefully the IRA will disband followed by the UdA and then RIRA/
RHC etc. will follow suite; Christmas 2004 could be the end of paramilaterism in Northern Ireland-we can live in hope :)

dortie
22/10/2004, 9:28 PM
Hopefully the IRA will disband followed by the UdA and then RIRA/
RHC etc. will follow suite; Christmas 2004 could be the end of paramilaterism in Northern Ireland-we can live in hope :)

You sound like you are trying to educate yourself on the history of the North which is to be commended, but what you post is pure hope and does not represent reality. The media may potray the problem as being solved but it isnt, its got better but its not solved.

As for the IRA disbanding, you should read more about republicanism and its ideals before you talk yourself into that belief. The main cause of the conflict has not been removed, and although SF are trying to go down the political path for the remedy there will always be those who will not move from their traditional beliefs, like it or not.

I hope I will live to see peace but personally I dont believe there will be 'total' peace until the main cause of conflict has been removed.

liam88
23/10/2004, 8:55 AM
You sound like you are trying to educate yourself on the history of the North which is to be commended,

Cheers Dortie-like I said, to young to experience it firs thand so getting most of my background from books, internet, old news stories and you guys ;)



but what you post is pure hope and does not represent reality. The media may potray the problem as being solved but it isnt, its got better but its not solved.

As for the IRA disbanding, you should read more about republicanism and its ideals before you talk yourself into that belief. The main cause of the conflict has not been removed, and although SF are trying to go down the political path for the remedy there will always be those who will not move from their traditional beliefs, like it or not.



:( Sad buit true I guess-like I said you know a lot more about it than I do obviously so I'm taking in your judgement. I knew ma post was pretty over-optomistic....

Duncan Gardner
23/10/2004, 9:29 AM
As long as you acknowledge the role of the Loyalists

The post you quoted was me acknowledging- highlighting- atrocity by unionist paramilitaries!


their previous illegal occupation

It's legitimised de facto by hundreds of years living there...


presume then you agree with the Israelis & Yanks who are currently indulged in similar 'moral' occupation?

No- why would I do that? Of course, if I could borrow your mate Dr Who's Tardis and nip back to 1169 or whenever, I might deplore ol' Dermot McMurrough inviting his mate Strongbow over for a ruck. You know, with the benefit of hindsight and that :)


Sadly,the 'Planters' are living up to their name

Why- are they planting somewhere else?