View Full Version : Duffer
Littlest Hobo
27/08/2004, 8:30 AM
Saying they are equivalent to Rangers is total b-oll-x. There have always been loads of Chelsea fans in Ireland and I can go in to the Chelsea shop and buy my Chelsea t-shirts and caps emblazoned with the tricolour. OK they are an English team but they are no more English than Man Yoo or Liverpool or Leeds.
Don't think so :rolleyes: Chelsea are UDA/UVF in disguise. The f****rs celebrate the queens birthday. The sooner Duff leaves the better.
fergalr
27/08/2004, 12:41 PM
Don't think so :rolleyes: Chelsea are UDA/UVF in disguise. The f****rs celebrate the queens birthday. The sooner Duff leaves the better.
I'll restate the bleedin obvious for the slow learners - Chelsea, Man Yoo, Liverpool are all equally English. There ain't no basis in fact for slagging of one of them over the others. I've been in bars in West London full of Irish-based Chelsea fans - this would never be the case if your spurious allegation were true.
Despite his injuries, Duffer's career progressed several notches in his first season with Chelsea. Anyone who saw his stunning performance in the Stadio Olympico will testify to that.
fergalr
30/08/2004, 12:33 PM
Chelsea fans are notorious for their celebration of their little englander diatribe and are often heard singing racist/white supremacist songs. Especially on European nights...
Don't know who's feeding you this nonsense - its simply not true. I go over regularly and I'm sure I would have noticed!
To back on topic - twas great to see Duffer back. Needless to say he got a great reception as usual.
colster
07/09/2004, 5:08 PM
Looks like Duff is in Mourinho's first team plans after all.
http://skysports.planetfootball.com/list.asp?hlid=224316&lid=2&cpid=8&title=Mourinho+plans+wing+play
thejollyrodger
07/09/2004, 6:46 PM
Mourinho probably got the idea of playing two wingers while watching Ireland the other day: P Good to see he has realised that his team need width, trying to play through the middle all the time was getting him nowhere.
tricky_colour
07/09/2004, 9:50 PM
Its a little bit unclear though, isn't it, because Duff is
'fit enough'.
Both at the same time? When both are fit? Or won't
he play Duff untill Robben is fit?
Duff played a part in all three goals (minor in Reids) which
is normally MOM stuff, I didn't see the game my self though.
When someone does that in an international you cannot
question his abilities, fit or unfit.
Duff is an excellent passer of the ball IMO, he tends to weight
them perfectly which makes scoring much easier.
Which reminds me, I must have a go at downloading the
goals from the FAI site again as it keep timing out last time
I tried it.
Thumbs up to the FAI for making the goals available, maybe
me and others posting goals footage twisted their arm :D
Is there a way to save the footage? I believe there is as someone
her pointed out (I will look), some temp file somewhere.
Also I think I have to convert them to mpegs to get them to
play better.
And finally I have to figure out a way of stopping realplayer installing
it self on my computer against my wishes, I only usually find out it
has crept back on when it tries to surepticiously access the internet
for some reason (worse than a frigging virus in my opinion) and
Zonealarm flags it up.
I tried before but it somehow manages to crash my computer so
that the modifications are lost. :confused:
tricky_colour
07/09/2004, 9:52 PM
Mourinho probably got the idea of playing two wingers while watching Ireland the other day: P Good to see he has realised that his team need width, trying to play through the middle all the time was getting him nowhere.
As Holland found out, against us, not so very long ago!!!
eirebhoy
07/09/2004, 10:09 PM
Is there a way to save the footage? I believe there is as someone
her pointed out (I will look), some temp file somewhere.
A program called "Stream Down" is what I use.
To get the link to the goals, position your mouse over the Cyprus goals pic and the link should come up on the left of the status bar.
eirebhoy
12/09/2004, 12:32 PM
“Damien was tired, he had just played two games for his country and had played every minute of both games with Ireland,” revealed Mourinho, as reported in the Star on Sunday.
“I went to Dublin on Saturday to watch him and I know he played the full game against Switzerland.
“It has been a hard week on our players away on international duty and it did affect us ahead of this game.
“But I can say that Damien Duff and Wayne Bridge will be selected on Tuesday night.”
Hither green
14/09/2004, 2:26 PM
“Damien was tired, he had just played two games for his country and had played every minute of both games with Ireland,” revealed Mourinho, as reported in the Star on Sunday.
“But I can say that Damien Duff and Wayne Bridge will be selected on Tuesday night.”
That’s interesting and hopefully an end to the matter. According to the Chelsea website he might start. I’m glad I’m not going mad though, I couldn’t believe that anyone in their right mind would prefer Cole over Duff, even with an unbiased hat on they're not in the same league. They certainly missed Duff’s attacking option on Saturday, I thought he'd at least make the bench.
I thought Mourinho might just be leaving Duff out to spite Ranieri’s mother.
Donal81
14/09/2004, 6:12 PM
I'll never understand this Duff upfront or on the wing debate. Not only is Duff one of the best and most dangerous wingers in the world today but he has never performed effectively upfront. When McCarthy used to play him with Keane upfront and Kilbane on the left, we had a brilliant winger playing in a position that doesn't suit him and an enthusiastic but poor winger on the wing. While McCarthy achieved a lot, I think that's his worst legacy, the notion that Duff can be played effectively up front. I've yet to witness the bloke have a good game up front. He eventually starts playing as a winger anyway, meaning that Robbie Keane is on his own, which doesn't suit him either. Honestly, how many reasons do you need to keep him on the wing where he nearly always impresses as opposed to putting him upfront where he nearly always disappoints and is eventually moved back to the wing? How many times did we see that in the World Cup?
Slash/ED
14/09/2004, 6:16 PM
“Damien was tired, he had just played two games for his country and had played every minute of both games with Ireland,” revealed Mourinho, as reported in the Star on Sunday.
“I went to Dublin on Saturday to watch him and I know he played the full game against Switzerland.
“It has been a hard week on our players away on international duty and it did affect us ahead of this game.
“But I can say that Damien Duff and Wayne Bridge will be selected on Tuesday night.”
He's only on the bench apparently. ****ing hell :mad:
eirebhoy
14/09/2004, 9:28 PM
I'll never understand this Duff upfront or on the wing debate. Not only is Duff one of the best and most dangerous wingers in the world today but he has never performed effectively upfront. When McCarthy used to play him with Keane upfront and Kilbane on the left, we had a brilliant winger playing in a position that doesn't suit him and an enthusiastic but poor winger on the wing. While McCarthy achieved a lot, I think that's his worst legacy, the notion that Duff can be played effectively up front. I've yet to witness the bloke have a good game up front. He eventually starts playing as a winger anyway, meaning that Robbie Keane is on his own, which doesn't suit him either. Honestly, how many reasons do you need to keep him on the wing where he nearly always impresses as opposed to putting him upfront where he nearly always disappoints and is eventually moved back to the wing? How many times did we see that in the World Cup?
To be fair, he played 80% of his time at the World cup up front and he was one of the players of the tournament while his strike partner was our top scorer.
I can't believe he only played 10 bloody minutes tonight. :confused:
Plastic Paddy
14/09/2004, 9:38 PM
To be fair, he played 80% of his time at the World cup up front and he was one of the players of the tournament while his strike partner was our top scorer.
I can't believe he only played 10 bloody minutes tonight. :confused:
Well, given our Celtic connection, you and I both know Mourinho to be a duplicitous c***. I can't say I'm surprised at the way he's treated DD. It's about time Duffer got away from Chelsea, even if (and it smacks of frying pan-to-fire here) it means going on loan to the beast's hordes at Newcastle.
:( PP
gspain
15/09/2004, 8:13 AM
Duffer can't go anywhere until January now - apparently he did well in the 10 minutes but Cole had a superb game as well so will likely start on Sunday. Hard to see Jose playing both of them. While Duffer is clearly a far better player he needs a chance to prove it.
Robben is out for at least another 3 weeks so Duffer should get to play some football before Paris. We need him match fit for that one.
Beanie
15/09/2004, 8:25 AM
Duff got to play in the 81 st minute last nite against PSG, for a player of his calibre and class this is simply not acceptable especially when players like the average joe Cole and Journey men like smertin and geremi are selected ahead of him, and Robben to come back into the squad!!!, it seems attacking wingers are not to Mourinho's liking, he wants something more continential yet the Chelsea fans are constantly bemoaning the lack of pace and attacking flair of this chelsea side.. January window would be my advise if i was Pat Devlin, Man Utd to replace Giggs or Newcastle bound for a Souness reunion, they seemed to have a good understanding
spirit of 88
15/09/2004, 8:38 AM
it's a disgrace DD cant get a game at chelsea ahead of the likes of joe cole. That portuguese ***** has a personal problem with duffer.
Slash/ED
15/09/2004, 11:06 AM
To be fair, he played 80% of his time at the World cup up front and he was one of the players of the tournament while his strike partner was our top scorer.
He only played well when switched to the left and his strike partner got the majority of his goals with Duff on the left.
eirebhoy
15/09/2004, 11:16 AM
He only played well when switched to the left
Everyone from around the world were raving about him. I don't think it just because of his performances on the left. He also got into the UEFA team of the year for 2002.
I wouldn't play him up front but its ridiculous to say he never had a good performance in that position.
Slash/ED
15/09/2004, 11:21 AM
Everyone from around the world were raving about him. I don't think it just because of his performances on the left. He also got into the UEFA team of the year for 2002.
I wouldn't play him up front but its ridiculous to say he never had a good performance in that position.
Everyone raved about his performances on the wing. Even the world cup report Fifa published said playing him up front was madness and he was isolated until he moved to the left. His partnership with Keane, goalswise, is pathetic really. I can't think of a single performance he's had up front where he's come close to what he's capable of doing on the left, including the world cup where he was poor, and Ireland were poor, until he was moved to the wing. Which is why we kept starting games poorly before eventually coming back into them, like Cameroon, Germany and Spain, even Saudi Arabia you could say we were shocking in the first half.
And did he not get on the UEFA team of the year...on the left wing?
Hither green
15/09/2004, 12:22 PM
Has Duff ever played up front with someone other than Keane, when Keane wasn’t available? I’d be interested to see that. The trouble with them as a partnership is that both of them spend too long out of the box and we end up with no one in the middle to put the ball away.
What was the point of Mourinho going to the Cyprus game? Duff played well enough to show he’s fit and on form. Assuming he really had an intention to consider Duff I don’t see what more Duff could have done. There wasn’t anything to prompt him dropping Duff from the squad. And despite the toothless Chelsea display on Saturday Mourinho still persists with second-rate Cole. He must really have a problem with Duff as I’d rather Kilbane to Joe Cole, at least Kilbane he has spirit!
Littlest Hobo
15/09/2004, 12:33 PM
Duff got to play in the 81 st minute last nite against PSG, for a player of his calibre and class this is simply not acceptable especially when players like the average joe Cole and Journey men like smertin and geremi are selected ahead of him, and Robben to come back into the squad!!!, it seems attacking wingers are not to Mourinho's liking, he wants something more continential yet the Chelsea fans are constantly bemoaning the lack of pace and attacking flair of this chelsea side.. January window would be my advise if i was Pat Devlin, Man Utd to replace Giggs or Newcastle bound for a Souness reunion, they seemed to have a good understanding
Agree with you there...
He's not in chelsea plans....fullstop!!
A spell on loan at Newcastle would do him good.
Going on media speculation.....there could be 5 irish lining out in January, with reid also being targeted by souey :D
fergalr
15/09/2004, 12:43 PM
Agree with you there...
He's not in chelsea plans....fullstop!!
A spell on loan at Newcastle would do him good.
Going on media speculation.....there could be 5 irish lining out in January, with reid also being targeted by souey :D
Mourinho taking the time to come over to Dublin shows that Duffer is in his plans. You guys have to got to accept that Duffer is now at a big club with one of the best squads in Europe. He's going to have to play out of his skin to get a game regularly but I for one am pretty sure he will and that's going to be of benefit to him and to the national team.
Going to Newcastle would be a backward step in his career. Remember also that Souness doesn't have the best reputation for dealing with Irish players.
Going to Many Yoo would be worse as DD will then be picking up injuries on the eve of every Ireland game.
Littlest Hobo
15/09/2004, 12:54 PM
Mourinho taking the time to come over to Dublin shows that Duffer is in his plans. You guys have to got to accept that Duffer is now at a big club with one of the best squads in Europe. He's going to have to play out of his skin to get a game regularly but I for one am pretty sure he will and that's going to be of benefit to him and to the national team.
Going to Newcastle would be a backward step in his career. Remember also that Souness doesn't have the best reputation for dealing with Irish players.
Going to Many Yoo would be worse as DD will then be picking up injuries on the eve of every Ireland game.
Regular football with the toons, is better than warming the chelsea bench.
I'm all for duff playing against the best in the CL, but he'll always be a bit player under Mourinho.
On a different note....I would like to see robbie keane move to Celtic. Hartson and camara were awfull last night. He would be a good partner for sutton :D
eirebhoy
15/09/2004, 1:03 PM
On a different note....I would like to see robbie keane move to Celtic. Hartson and camara were awfull last night. He would be a good partner for sutton :D
i though camara played well, he set up the goal too.
Duff got to play in the 81 st minute last nite against PSG, for a player of his calibre and class this is simply not acceptable especially when players like the average joe Cole and Journey men like smertin and geremi are selected ahead of him, and Robben to come back into the squad!!!, it seems attacking wingers are not to Mourinho's liking, he wants something more continential yet the Chelsea fans are constantly bemoaning the lack of pace and attacking flair of this chelsea side.. January window would be my advise if i was Pat Devlin, Man Utd to replace Giggs or Newcastle bound for a Souness reunion, they seemed to have a good understanding
Its amazing that you can go onto the Chelsea message board (http://www.bbc.co.uk/cgi-perl/h2cluster2/h2.cgi?thread=%3C1095236817-23034.2%40forum5.thdo.bbc.co.uk%3E&find=%3C1095236817-23034.2%40forum5.thdo.bbc.co.uk%3E&board=sixosix.chelsea&sort=Te), slag off 3 of their players and they still agree with you. The Chelsea fans bloody love Duff.
Hither green
15/09/2004, 1:24 PM
You guys have to got to accept that Duffer is now at a big club with one of the best squads in Europe. He's going to have to play out of his skin to get a game regularly
You mean like Joe Cole? I'm not entirely sure how or when Cole did enough to warrant a chance in the first team but Mourinho seems to love him! Sure Duff's been injured but he deserves more than 9 minutes, especially after Saturday's result.
Littlest Hobo
15/09/2004, 3:53 PM
[QUOTE=eirebhoy]i though camara played well, he set up the goal too.
Agreed.......the lad played his heart out, and set up a good goal. But Celtic need a striker with a proven scoring record. With larson gone, theres only sutton capable of firing them in now.
Donal81
15/09/2004, 6:16 PM
To be fair, he played 80% of his time at the World cup up front and he was one of the players of the tournament while his strike partner was our top scorer.
I can't believe he only played 10 bloody minutes tonight. :confused:
If I remember correctly - and it was two years ago so I'm open to correction - but the only time that he was truly effective in the World Cup was when operating from the wings, against Cameroon, Germany and Spain. When he's up front waiting for the ball, he's useless and one of the brightest talents in world football is being snuffed out. In the end, he always ends up coming back to the wings anyway which leaves Robbie up front on his own which neither suits him or our style of play. He was indeed one of the players of the tournament, largely on the basis of his brilliant game against Spain when he was moved to the wings. I honestly just cannot comprehend this notion that Irish supporters and managers have that he can do a job up front. I don't think that Rainieri ever used him up front. Again, I'm not sure about this one as I find watching Abrahmovic's Chelsea surreal and don't do it often and Rainier had more options up front than we ever will but he's always been more effective from the wings. I'm waiting for one example where he's been used to great effect as a striker. I don't think you're suggesting this anyway Eirebhoy, not taking a dig at you, just very frustrated that this continues to come up.
eirebhoy
15/09/2004, 6:31 PM
I honestly just cannot comprehend this notion that Irish supporters and managers have that he can do a job up front.
I don't think you'll find anyone on here that would play Duff up front and certainly not me.
Slash/ED
15/09/2004, 6:40 PM
I don't think you'll find anyone on here that would play Duff up front and certainly not me.
Unfortunately in the "What XI would you pick" threads a worrying amount do seem to want to put Duffer up front. I think Morrisons two goals though will help change that.
eirebhoy
15/09/2004, 9:49 PM
Unfortunately in the "What XI would you pick" threads a worrying amount do seem to want to put Duffer up front. I think Morrisons two goals though will help change that.
But that was when Robbie was supposed to be injured for the first 2 games. With everyone fit nobody would want Duff up front.
Donal81
16/09/2004, 5:19 PM
But that was when Robbie was supposed to be injured for the first 2 games. With everyone fit nobody would want Duff up front.
Everyone was fit plenty of the time when McCarthy was manager and, although there was constant criticism of his use of Kilbane over Duff, plenty of people thought this was the best idea, allow Kilbane to do the donkey work and allow Duff to work his magic. It's a theory with absolutely no basis and stems solely from McCarthy. The man had his moments but this gets on my wick to a huge degree, his worst legacy, as I already said. Maybe it's just people trying to be contrary, I don't know, but there are people out there who are convinced the bloke should play up front as he's our best option. To be honest, I'd much rather have Duff putting crosses on a plate for the likes of Morrison as opposed to Kilbane putting crosses - if that's what you want to call them - into Duff, who is not a striker, has never been a striker and cannot play as a striker. End result - we don't create and we don't score.
thejollyrodger
16/09/2004, 5:42 PM
When you start to look at the irish team it doesnt exactly inspire confidence. There are problems all over the park. Duff is a good player but looks like he has defintely fallen out of favour with Chelsea. I would make a bolt for Liverpool if I were him.
If he does play on the left (his best position & where he should start), lots of defenders are well ready for him and close him down very quick. I dont think Duff is being used effectively without a second winger. Andy Reid being it but doesnt look like he is physically up to international standards.
eirebhoy
16/09/2004, 6:58 PM
Andy Reid being it but doesnt look like he is physically up to international standards.
He had 9 consistently superb performances for Ireland, just because he wasn't the best against the Swiss doesn't mean he's suddenly not up to international standards.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.