View Full Version : Mick McCarthy in line for Forest job?
tricky_colour
12/07/2012, 2:30 PM
Forest have some new rich owners and have sacked the current boss Steve Cotterill,
Mick is one of the contenders for the job.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18812339
legendz
12/07/2012, 3:08 PM
Harry would be the clear favourite if they can land him? If not, Mick McCarthy would be the man to get Forest out of the Championship. Mick not Roy being the man to rescue Forest, can it happen?
CraftyToePoke
12/07/2012, 4:13 PM
Seems the Irish chairman of Peterborough Utd, Darragh MacAnthony, reported or threatened to report Forest last week for tapping up Darren Ferguson for the job, so all kinds of Irish angles to this one. Peterborough were confident of naming a signing at the beginning of yesterday, which didn't happen and that isn't helping quell the rumours. Probably just forum/paper talk though. Would be a good job for Mick.
MacAnthony : http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18719471
Stuttgart88
12/07/2012, 5:54 PM
He's a bit of a tool that guy isn't he.
tricky_colour
12/07/2012, 5:58 PM
Just seen a report on TH and I think they said Ferguson was the favourite with Mick 3-1
I think Rednapp said he was not interested, but he said that about England too lol.
Here are some of the odds latest.
http://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/nottm-forest-specials/next-permanent-manager
Darren Ferguson 8/11 8/11 1 8/11 8/11 5/6 1/2 5/6
Mick McCarthy 2 2 2 7/4 2 15/8 4 2
Roy Keane 8 10 11 12 8 10 12 10
Dougie Freedman 12 16 16
Harry Redknapp 14 16 18 16 18 12 10 12
So micks odds may have shortened since a few hours ago.
CraftyToePoke
12/07/2012, 6:22 PM
He's a bit of a tool that guy isn't he.
He can be quite bullish, more so before his property portfolio took a hammering in the last few years. He doesn't speak as much about Peterborough being Permiership bound as used to. I'd say he would do certain things differently if he had it all to do again, but, he is popular with Peterborough supporters. They like him, that said its not that long since they were in League 2 with Big Ron Manager being filmed under Barry Fry so he didn't have massive boots to fill.
tricky_colour
12/07/2012, 10:19 PM
Interesting. Most bookmakers seem not to taking bets on this only one still going says this.
I do hope it's not Hoddle!!! Keane and Mick in a race for second.
Glenn Hoddle 4/9
Roy Keane 5/2
Mick McCarthy 3
Darren Ferguson 4
tricky_colour
12/07/2012, 11:18 PM
There is also a possibility of the Turkish manager who managed their Kuwaiti team - Illava Donner Ke-bab
tricky_colour
12/07/2012, 11:21 PM
Or Hammed Itupfield
seanfhear
13/07/2012, 9:54 AM
Interesting. Most bookmakers seem not to taking bets on this only one still going says this.
I do hope it's not Hoddle!!! Keane and Mick in a race for second.
Glenn Hoddle 4/9
Roy Keane 5/2
Mick McCarthy 3
Darren Ferguson 4
If Hoddle left the religious rawmaesh behind him I would be inclined to give him a go. He was not doing too bad in the England job until he wrote the dumb book (to pay the alimony) and came out with the religio stuff.
He should come out and say he has lost God and just wants to be one of the boyos !
bennocelt
13/07/2012, 1:26 PM
Except he didnt rate M Owen, who proceeded to score when finally given his chance
seanfhear
13/07/2012, 2:13 PM
Except he didnt rate M Owen, who proceeded to score when finally given his chanceTrue but Owen was only 17 !
bennocelt
13/07/2012, 3:12 PM
True but Owen was only 17 !
Wrong, he was nearly 19 and he only played him in the world cup due to the press and the fact he messed up in the first two games. Owen came on and, sure enough, scored.
seanfhear
13/07/2012, 3:34 PM
Wrong, he was nearly 19 and he only played him in the world cup due to the press and the fact he messed up in the first two games. Owen came on and, sure enough, scored.You are better briefed than me and to be fair i did not put up to much of a case. Hoddle was doing okay with England though but he has a big ego and was inclined to think he was still a better player than some of his players. Its surprising that he has not managed to get back on the managerial carousel though. You do sometimes worry about Fellas that have been out of the job for a long time (Daglish for example, but I was worried about him after he left Blackburn)
tricky_colour
13/07/2012, 4:40 PM
Mick is currently favourite.
Mick McCarthy 4/6 5/4 7/5 6/4 4/6 6/4 4/5 1
Glenn Hoddle 9/4 5/6 6/4 8/11 11/10 6/4 5/2 6/4
Darren Ferguson 9/2 9/2 4 4 9/2 3 3 4
Roy Keane 7 6 9/2 5 2 8 8 7/2
Murfinator
14/07/2012, 11:29 AM
Oil rich club with high ambitions, can't see them going for a traditionally conservative and resourceful manager like Mick.
seanfhear
14/07/2012, 12:14 PM
Oil rich club with high ambitions, can't see them going for a traditionally conservative and resourceful manager like Mick.
It will probably be a Glamour candidate.
Mick should try some high heels, Blonde bombshell wig, low cut dress with plenty of cleavage showing.
The way some of these new owners are casting aside existing managers (Cotteril, Dyche)is a bit condescending to the English game. I only wish these managers had salaries on big bucks and get a complete payoff. They probably will get their payoffs and wouldn't it be great if they get an opportunity to bite back.
Murfinator
14/07/2012, 12:33 PM
It will probably be a Glamour candidate.
Mick should try some high heels, Blonde bombshell wig, low cut dress with plenty of cleavage showing.
The way some of these new owners are casting aside existing managers (Cotteril, Dyche)is a bit condescending to the English game. I only wish these managers had salaries on big bucks and get a complete payoff. They probably will get their payoffs and wouldn't it be great if they get an opportunity to bite back.
English coaching standard is dreadful, if they're smart the first thing any owner would do is sack them all in favour of a staff team from a more competent background.
seanfhear
14/07/2012, 12:45 PM
English coaching standard is dreadful, if they're smart the first thing any owner would do is sack them all in favour of a staff team from a more competent background.They are not giving the existing managers a chance. Did Zola set the managerial world alight ?
If there was an Irishman at these clubs they would be sacked as well. -
Murfinator
14/07/2012, 3:22 PM
They are not giving the existing managers a chance. Did Zola set the managerial world alight ?
If there was an Irishman at these clubs they would be sacked as well. -
Irishmen are involved in the same coaching circles so are held in the same low standards. Put it this way, if these guys were talented managers/coaches being unfairly disposed of they'd be jumped on by every serious team across Europe. The number of coaches/managers trained and developed within the english system who go on to be successful elsewhere could be counted on one hand in the past 20 years. You might be right about a fair chance but when the precedent is 99% of coaches in that system being muck you can understand why any new chairman would take the decision to employ from better backgrounds, too much money at stake to play the loyalty card that your man is that rare 1% in the bracket.
Noelys Guitar
14/07/2012, 5:01 PM
According to this its Micks to turn down. http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Mick-McCarthy-takes-step-closer-landing/story-16535191-detail/story.html No interviews for Roy so I take it that rules him out. I think Keane is a better manager than Mick (though not by much). He got Sunderland up straight away in his first job (yes he had money but look at King Kenny) and kept them up. Messed up at Ipswich but I still feel he has it within himself to become a half decent manager.
tricky_colour
14/07/2012, 5:36 PM
Oil rich club with high ambitions, can't see them going for a traditionally conservative and resourceful manager like Mick.
It remains to be seen how much money they are willing to put into the club, it may not be as much as some think.
I certainly have not seen a figures on how much money they will be willing to put into the club.
http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Al-Hasawi-family-aim-Nottingham-Forest-time/story-16536068-detail/story.html
"but that they will be patient when it comes to winning promotion"
"This is not about money, it is about passion."
They made their money from refrigeration and air-conditioning, not oil, apparently, so I have my doubts about how much
money they have and are willing to put in. Probably a lot less than most people think.
And there is this statement from elsewhere , “be assured of our best efforts in bringing the Reds back to the top of the table.”.
Note that is top of the table not top of the Premiership.
So given all that Mick would seem to fit the bill, ie not too expensive, it does not sound like they will be showing the
club with cash.
Notts county has some 'rich middle east backers' a while back but little came of it.
Stuttgart88
14/07/2012, 8:17 PM
It bloody stinks that English football clubs have to tart themselves out to rich foreigners. The EPL and SKY couldn't give two hoots about the consequences for the broader game that their model brings about. Scudamore had the nerve last week to say that their rules would have prevented Rangers' bust. Horsesh1t. Look at Portsmouth. The EPL chairman, a crook called Sir Dave Richards testified last year that he couldn't be bothered trying to enforce their fit and proper persons ownership test, it was beneath him.
Notts County was even worse. They didn't even have any money, and nobody bothered to check. The FL didn't even know who owned Leeds until recently. Effing joke, made worse by the consequences their casual self interest has across the whole game, in England and abroad.
mark12345
14/07/2012, 9:45 PM
Irishmen are involved in the same coaching circles so are held in the same low standards. Put it this way, if these guys were talented managers/coaches being unfairly disposed of they'd be jumped on by every serious team across Europe. The number of coaches/managers trained and developed within the english system who go on to be successful elsewhere could be counted on one hand in the past 20 years. You might be right about a fair chance but when the precedent is 99% of coaches in that system being muck you can understand why any new chairman would take the decision to employ from better backgrounds, too much money at stake to play the loyalty card that your man is that rare 1% in the bracket.
One hundred per cent true.
Finally people are beginning to wake up (and speak about it) to the fact that English managers and players are muck and we are also. Just watched the Spain / France U-19's play. I'd give either team a few years and they'd be able to take on England or us. IT's time for major change folks, and it all starts with coaching.
mark12345
15/07/2012, 1:03 AM
It bloody stinks that English football clubs have to tart themselves out to rich foreigners. .
Could you imagine if English football was left to the English. You'd have no Manchester City, no Roman Abramovich etc. And you'd be left with, wait for it.......the Championship. Now that's a standard to be proud of.
Stuttgart88
15/07/2012, 4:19 PM
When it was left to the English they won the European Cup time and time again.
You might have Man City now but you wouldn't have 70% of English football insolvent and stealing money from the taxman. Check out the DCMS Football Governance Report.
Junior
15/07/2012, 9:03 PM
Just a thought, when it was left to the English (and when it wasnt for that matter) and as you say stutts, Forest,Villa,Liverpool were winning the European Cup - It never manifested itself in to National Team success. The 80's was a pretty poor time for England at tournaments. A losing SF spot being the best performance (and that was in the 90's actually)....
World Cups....
1982 Second Group stage
1986 Quarter-final
1990 Fourth place
Euros...
1980 -Group Stage 5th
1984 -Did not qualify
1988 - Group Stage 7th
1992 - Group Stage 7th
barney
16/07/2012, 7:48 AM
Just a thought, when it was left to the English (and when it wasnt for that matter) and as you say stutts, Forest,Villa,Liverpool were winning the European Cup - It never manifested itself in to National Team success. The 80's was a pretty poor time for England at tournaments. A losing SF spot being the best performance (and that was in the 90's actually)....
World Cups....
1982 Second Group stage
1986 Quarter-final
1990 Fourth place
Euros...
1980 -Group Stage 5th
1984 -Did not qualify
1988 - Group Stage 7th
1992 - Group Stage 7th
Or you could turn that on its head and say that in three World Cups, England only lost one game aside from shoot-outs and that one game was partly thanks to a handball goal.
The Euros were also a lot tougher back then because it was only 8 teams.
Stuttgart88
16/07/2012, 8:59 AM
And since the EPL, England has made last 16s and last 8s by and large - with one(?) semi-final in 1996. Not a massive improvement. National team success has been just as elusive really, and certainly lags the financial might and global popularity of the the EPL. With the exception of the 2004 Euros I think the major countries have seen England as eminently beatable.
My contention - in response to Mark's strange post - is that actually enforcing rules about who owns football clubs has longer term merits. Abramovic was shown in the UK courts to be what he is last year - a hood and an opportunist. It'd be like one of our gombeen property developers buying a foreign club with the money Bertie and his cronies allowed him to loot by dodgy planning deals. The Man City guy who nearly bankrupted the club while on the run from the Thai government, the Notts Co. money laundering scam, the Leeds United offshore trust that nobody could trace, the Glazers who saddled a debt free club with nearly a billion pounds of debt just so they could take it over by injecting just a slither of equity, the US twits who nearly bankrupted Liverpool, the FIVE separate owners of Portsmouth FC, one of whom was a clear asset stripper (buying the area around the ground for development) and the others who couldn't even provide evidence of having any money.
Interesting reading here
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmcumeds/792/792i.pdf
while some of the submissions given in the evidence gathering are also quite intersting.
CraftyToePoke
16/07/2012, 1:27 PM
He's talking to them.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18854513
Uncle_Joe
16/07/2012, 5:08 PM
Micks says no. Strange one, out of work manager to be offered a job (I presume that was what was going on) and then turn it down.
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11095/7904866/McCarthy-won-t-take-Forest-job
Junior
16/07/2012, 8:56 PM
Or you could turn that on its head and say that in three World Cups, England only lost one game aside from shoot-outs and that one game was partly thanks to a handball goal.
The Euros were also a lot tougher back then because it was only 8 teams.
You could turn it on its head but it would still make my point. Lack of success on the international stage despite club dominance in Europe.
tricky_colour
17/07/2012, 3:19 AM
Micks says no. Strange one, out of work manager to be offered a job (I presume that was what was going on) and then turn it down.
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11095/7904866/McCarthy-won-t-take-Forest-job
It might fit in with my theory that these guys are not keen on spending much money at all.
I can imagine the conversation:
Mick: "so how much money will you be putting in?"
New owners: "None."
Mick "No thanks!!"
But it is still odd if he has nothing else lined up. (maybe he has?). If they are not putting much money in Forest could easily get relegated.
But it does not look like these new owners are going to be "sugar daddies" pumping tonnes of money into the club.
ANytime they have been asked question about investing in the club the response has always been under-whelming,
Reporter: "New stadium?"
Mr Al-Hasawi: "[A new stadium] is something we are looking at and studying. Our main focus and concern is to renovate and refurbish the existing stadium, the City Ground."
So sounds like they nay be able to stretch to a few tins of paint!!!
I expect Mick may well have been offered a lot less than he was on previously?
barney
17/07/2012, 9:16 AM
You could turn it on its head but it would still make my point. Lack of success on the international stage despite club dominance in Europe.
Not if you're saying that it was a poor time for England in tournaments. One could argue that it was their best era in international tournaments (1966 aside).
Stuttgart88
17/07/2012, 9:35 AM
Isn't the point that there was no marked difference in English team performance both pre- and post-EPL? They were regularly last 8 or thereabouts with the odd non-qualification.
I think they're marginally better now - they tend to sail through qualification going back to when Sven was appointed, 2008 aside.
barney
17/07/2012, 10:34 AM
Isn't the point that there was no marked difference in English team performance both pre- and post-EPL? They were regularly last 8 or thereabouts with the odd non-qualification.
I think they're marginally better now - they tend to sail through qualification going back to when Sven was appointed, 2008 aside.
Which is fair comment. Not sure they are marginally better now though than the 80s. The Euros going to 16 teams has meant they will usually get through the group phase rather than going out in the first round. It's much of a muchness either way though.
Stuttgart88
17/07/2012, 11:00 AM
yep, either way it's still "last 8 or thereabouts"!
I think they had a good 1970 WC, only an injury to Banks preventing a semi-final. I think they were 2 up against W Germany and then Bonetti had a howler. The rest of the 70s were 2 non-qualifies, for WCs anyway. I think they qualified for everything in the 80s, getting through group stages but not much further, bar 88 of course.
tricky_colour
18/07/2012, 7:29 PM
Glenn Noddle now favourite closely followed by Sean O'Driscol, a former ROI international, played 3 games.
He is currently league one Crawley manager, but was briefly at Forest (Jan - May) this year as a coach.
Yes another indication to me that the new owners are intent on spending as little money as possible,
which I guess is why Mick turned it down.
Having said that it seems to me that Hoddle may not be too keen on the job either.
Neil Warnock is a close 3rd favourite with one bookmaker but about 8-1 with others.
Roy Kane about 9-1.
tricky_colour
19/07/2012, 3:41 PM
Sean O'Driscol looks likely to be the next manager according to the betting he is 5-1 and 6-1 on with two big bookmakers.
tricky_colour
19/07/2012, 9:38 PM
Well have a new Irish boss but it's O'Driscol not McCarthy.
Forest have Andy Reid and and one other Irish Brendan Maloney 23 right back and Ireland u21.
TWO L's!!!!!!!!
(its driving me mental)
tricky_colour
20/07/2012, 2:37 AM
mentall ;)
tricky_colour
23/07/2012, 5:58 PM
Seems the new forest boss has made his first signing Adlene Guedioura from Wolves, so first signing
is basically a Wolves reject
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18961761
So the lack of ambition ( and hence money) looks like why Mick turned the job down.
Colbert Report
24/07/2012, 3:45 AM
TWO L's!!!!!!!!
(its driving me mental)
It is?
liamoo11
01/12/2012, 3:58 PM
Sensational from mick is that 4 wins out of 6 since he too over with 2 hammerings when they lost hope he keeps them up
tommy_c12000
01/12/2012, 4:32 PM
Sensational from mick is that 4 wins out of 6 since he too over with 2 hammerings when they lost hope he keeps them up
They will definitely stay up. Question is how far up the table they will climb. If they keep going the way they are going, they could be pushing for play offs in the New Yr. But I suspect they will gravitate towards mid-table obscurity yet again
tricky_colour
01/12/2012, 4:33 PM
I think it's something like 13 points out of 21 since he took over, prior to that it was 2 points out of 24!!
Quite a turn around!!
Charlie Darwin
01/12/2012, 6:50 PM
Paul Jewell for Ireland.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.