Log in

View Full Version : Jack charlton, roy keane, euro 2012 (passage of time)



mark12345
14/06/2012, 8:55 PM
Does anyone need any extra convincing (after that performance against Spain) that possession is 99% of the game in football. Sure, goals win games but the Ireland v Spain game just illustrated how many chances can be created by the best possession team in the world verus that which gives away the ball the most.

Our first major tournament was 24 years ago. We did a lot under Jack because he recognised the fact that we couldn't maintain possession. He came up with a game plan and it worked wonders. And just to think some people still ridicule Jack to this day. In my mind he was a genius.

And speaking of geniuses, Roy Keane was also a genius.

He managed to pull together a bunch of players (better than that assembled tonight) and made them actually pass the ball and place a premium on not giving it away. We used to go to places like Holland and Portugal and have a real go at them.

And to think Roy was ridiculed and still is to this day.

So where to from here?

Major surgery is needed to our brains really. We have got to stop giving the ball away. It's our friend, when you keep it and moved it from player to player good things happen (as we all saw today).

Until the FAI hires some really good foreign coaches who can teach this aspect of the game to our youngsters, we are doomed.

Perhaps given the headline of this thread, Giovanni Trapattoni pales into insignificance as one who wasn't the best Irish manager of all time. Certainly I would take issue with him over his choice of midfielders. But that's small potatoes. The larger picture shows that we have to make radical changes to our game so as never to be embarassed like that again.

tricky_colour
14/06/2012, 9:31 PM
Traps game is basically parking the bus, unfortunately this time someone forgot to put the handbrake on.

OwlsFan
15/06/2012, 9:17 AM
And speaking of geniuses, Roy Keane was also a genius.

He managed to pull together a bunch of players (better than that assembled tonight) and made them actually pass the ball and place a premium on not giving it away. We used to go to places like Holland and Portugal and have a real go at them.

And to think Roy was ridiculed and still is to this day.

Have I been asleep for years? Did I miss when Keane was manager of our team?

As for possession, I may be wrong but I think Chelsea beat Barcelona and Bayern with far less possession as did England against Spain recently. You start by defending properly which we did not. Both our early goals were conceded by giving away the ball in our own half. By trying to keep possession in our half.

You can have all the foreign coaches in the world in Ireland, but our players play in the English game.

mark12345
15/06/2012, 9:28 AM
Have I been asleep for years? Did I miss when Keane was manager of our team?

Don't know if you've been sleeping for years, but you're asleep now. Who ever said Keane was the manager? Keane was a genius as a player and captain in that he pulled a bunch of team mates together and got them to play proper football.

mark12345
15/06/2012, 9:33 AM
As for possession, I may be wrong but I think Chelsea beat Barcelona and Bayern with far less possession as did England against Spain recently. You start by defending properly which we did not. Both our early goals were conceded by giving away the ball in our own half. By trying to keep possession in our half.

Agreed, Chelsea were the luckiest team to win the Champions League. But at least when they got the ball they knew what to do with it. It's that old 'possession' thing, you know. You do need to possess the ball and pass it constructively for anything good to happen. You saw the results of the opposite last night.

And YES we do need foreign coaches in Ireland. I'm talking about the 5 and 6 year old kids who are learning to play the game. They need technical coaching. How much technical coaching do you think the likes of Keith Andrews, Richard Dunne and Stephen Ward had when they were kids?

brine3
15/06/2012, 9:55 AM
Our underage teams are actually quite good at passing the ball and we produce good, young footballers who can play possession football.

The problem is, unless they are good enough to end up at Man Utd, Chelsea or Arsenal, they end up going to some ****e team in the Championship or lower reaches of the Premiership, who teach them to "get it up and at them."

I hope Martinez stays at Wigan because he is really turning McCarthy into a proper player. Imagine if Neil Warnock took over there.

mark12345
15/06/2012, 10:51 AM
The problem is, unless they are good enough to end up at Man Utd, Chelsea or Arsenal, they end up going to some ****e team in the Championship or lower reaches of the Premiership, who teach them to "get it up and at them."

You're right brine, that is the problem in a nutshell. I think someone in some sort of coaching authority in Ireland, should begin to build relationships with foreign clubs (not English) in order for our top young lads to go there. We have a Dutch coach (Koverman) overseeing the whole thing? Could he not ask the likes of Ajax or PSV to take some of our youngsters and let them have a go there, rather than sending them to the English football whirlwind and see them, as you say, end up in the Championship.

OwlsFan
15/06/2012, 12:28 PM
Don't know if you've been sleeping for years, but you're asleep now. Who ever said Keane was the manager? Keane was a genius as a player and captain in that he pulled a bunch of team mates together and got them to play proper football.

What makes you think he got them to play "proper football"? I thought it was the manager's job to decide the style of football we play. As I said, when did Keane become manager? Did he give the talks in the changing room? Select the team? Decide the tactics? When did HE pull this group of players together?

Great player ok. Genius - I don't think so.

barney
15/06/2012, 12:37 PM
What makes you think he got them to play "proper football"? I thought it was the manager's job to decide the style of football we play. As I said, when did Keane become manager? Did he give the talks in the changing room? Select the team? Decide the tactics? When did HE pull this group of players together?

Great player ok. Genius - I don't think so.

Did you not notice how the team's playing style changed dramatically when he walked out and McCarthy imposed his long ball tactics??? No? Neither do I.

Original post is beneath contempt.

OwlsFan
15/06/2012, 1:24 PM
Also, I am sorry you were embarrassed. You must follow a team that wins all the time otherwise you'd be aware that teams frequently get stuffed (even Man U in the first derby game of the season). I have seen Ireland get played off the pitch including a 3-0 drubbing in Portugal in the rain, 1-3 at home to Spain in which the genius Keane played I think and he also played in Orlando in '94 when Holland also never gave us a kick.

I am delighted we got to this Final, very disappointed and saddened by the results (not aided by the 2 early goals) but embarrassed, no. Roll the sleeves up and get on with it and hopefully not concede early against the Italians and put in a much better performance, if capable of it.

Looking forward to that game and the new campaign already. I expect there will be a full review of what went wrong (there are huge bonuses for the FAI from UEFA for every point gained so they are hurting as well) but let's not forget the standard of the group we were in with a team made up of players from teams in the lower echelons of the Premiership and lower (and some with no clubs at all). The rugby team got a similar drubbing from the world champions.

mark12345
15/06/2012, 1:48 PM
Glad you mentioned the rugby team, because they demand a very high standard of themselves. Sure they have their lows as well as highs, but as a fan you can see a pretty high standard of play from our lads with the oval ball, most of the time. Same goes for our boxers, we should see them reap rewards in the Olympics.

What I'm saying is that we reached our first tournament 24 years ago. We didn't play football then, we couldn't. It's a quater of century later and we still can't play the game properly. Is that acceptable for any team or any association? Not by my standards and not by yours if you're honest.

mark12345
15/06/2012, 1:54 PM
What makes you think he got them to play "proper football"? I thought it was the manager's job to decide the style of football we play. As I said, when did Keane become manager? Did he give the talks in the changing room? Select the team? Decide the tactics? When did HE pull this group of players together? Great player ok. Genius - I don't think so.

He was a great player, actually a genius of a player. I know he's a headcase, agreed, but a genius also.

And he did pull this group of players together because he was the dominant force in the team, not the manager. In essence he did decide the tactics, now that you mention it. He was light years ahead of McCarthy in terms of know how. I like Mick, love him in fact, but let's call it like it is.

The manager's talks in the changing room were diluted by the demands of their captain on the field. That's likely where the conflict came in - don't know that for a fact but it would seem that way.

When did Keane become the manager? Is that question still relevant?

Stuttgart88
15/06/2012, 1:54 PM
We used to go to places like Holland and Portugal and have a real go at them.

And to think Roy was ridiculed and still is to this day.We had one shot on target in Portugal and it went in. We then hung on for the rest of the game and were on the back foot even before the goal. I don't know how we drew that game. The other time we lost 3-0 and it could have been more.

Roy Keane's football ability is not riduculed here and never has been. Some of the things he has said and done have been, and rightly so.

Whatever reasonable points might be trying to come out of your post, you just can't be taken remotely seriously because of the rest of the stuff you throw in.

mark12345
15/06/2012, 2:02 PM
Whatever reasonable points might be trying to come out of your post, you just can't be taken remotely seriously because of the rest of the stuff you throw in.

Sorry mate, but I feel exactly the same about you.


You seem to have strong opinions that are not for changing, but surely you'll agree that radical change is needed to our football philosphy.

If you don't, and you're happy with that type of performance last night, then you should be ecstatic in the years to come. Because it seems nothing is going to change if we continue to miss the forest for the trees.

Macy
15/06/2012, 2:07 PM
You're right brine, that is the problem in a nutshell. I think someone in some sort of coaching authority in Ireland, should begin to build relationships with foreign clubs (not English) in order for our top young lads to go there. We have a Dutch coach (Koverman) overseeing the whole thing? Could he not ask the likes of Ajax or PSV to take some of our youngsters and let them have a go there, rather than sending them to the English football whirlwind and see them, as you say, end up in the Championship.
Or we should be putting place the structures and coaches in place here, through our own national league, rather than sending them anywhere overseas. The best will go for the money, be that England or elsewhere. However, we have to take full responsibility for developing our own players. And that includes fans supporting their own clubs rather than foreign ones too.

And btw, there's actually quite a lot of similarities between our International Football and Rugby teams - both have a manager insisting on outdated tactics who refuses to pick our best players!

barney
15/06/2012, 2:07 PM
Glad you mentioned the rugby team, because they demand a very high standard of themselves. Sure they have their lows as well as highs, but as a fan you can see a pretty high standard of play from our lads with the oval ball, most of the time. Same goes for our boxers, we should see them reap rewards in the Olympics.

What I'm saying is that we reached our first tournament 24 years ago. We didn't play football then, we couldn't. It's a quater of century later and we still can't play the game properly. Is that acceptable for any team or any association? Not by my standards and not by yours if you're honest.

We beat England, we drew with the Soviet Union and were only beaten by a poxy goal from the eventual champions eight minutes from time. We surpassed every expectation of us in that tournament.

Stuttgart88
15/06/2012, 2:10 PM
And to think Roy was ridiculed and still is to this day.


I know he's a headcaseHang on, isn't that ridicule?

Anyway, to take on your point seriously, I think it's easy to think we're not developing technically adept players but despite how obviously deficient we have been I would hesitate to make that assumption, or at least to blame everything on that. I think other factors played a part - world class opposition, 3 key senior players not 100% sharp, poor team selection and a poor tactical approach that has been found out at a level above a qualification group.

The system is producing players like Coleman, Ireland, Hoolahan, Meyler and others I can't think of off the top of my head, all players who have decent technique. We developed Duff, Keane, Given, Dunne, Reid - all good technically - so ought to be able to do it again.

I do think it'd be feasible to be at least as technically proficient as Denmark who played great from 2 down to Portugal and whose players are (I suspect) playing at a lower level than ours do.

I'd genuinely like to know what the FAI technical development policy is and how it is being assessed (versus targets etc.).

Macy
15/06/2012, 2:22 PM
The system is producing players like Coleman, Ireland, Hoolahan, Meyler and others I can't think of off the top of my head, all players who have decent technique. We developed Duff, Keane, Given, Dunne, Reid - all good technically - so ought to be able to do it again.

I'd genuinely like to know what the FAI technical development policy is and how it is being assessed (versus targets etc.).
Those players are coming through despite the system, rather than because of it, imo. I guess we'll never know how many decent players never got the chance at underage level due to their (lack of) size, or how many that were sent over to England at 15 and sent home again disillusioned with football at 17 might have made it by the age of 20 or 21 if they'd stayed at home and kept at it and kept developing.


I'd genuinely like to know what the FAI technical development policy is and how it is being assessed (versus targets etc.).
It'll always be a flawed document anyway, as the FAI don't have the power over their member leagues to implement a proper technical plan. How long would it take for the school boy leagues to disaffiliate if the FAI said there should be no leagues or cups for under 15's for example?

Stuttgart88
15/06/2012, 3:00 PM
Sorry mate, but I feel exactly the same about you.


You seem to have strong opinions that are not for changing, but surely you'll agree that radical change is needed to our football philosphy.

If you don't, and you're happy with that type of performance last night, then you should be ecstatic in the years to come. Because it seems nothing is going to change if we continue to miss the forest for the trees.

I don't throw in nonsense on a regular basis. We're all entitled to become impassioned and emotional but you constantly throw in stuff that's open to immediate rebuttal just because of how yoiu say it, whereas I, in all modesty, don't.

I am always open to debate as long as it's sensible and done rationally. I do have firm opinions but I am also flexible.

Of course I'm not happy with that kind of performance. I haven't said I am and your last point was juvenile.

I don't buy into the knee jerk reaction that radical change is required simply because I don't know what our approach really is. There is no transparency around the FAI technical development plan but every now and then a talented young player comes through the system.

A much bigger problem, in my suspicion, is the total economic chasm between our game and the English system and all the negative consequences this has for our game. Also, whilst I had an open mind on Trap and his methods I'm now more convinced that his methods, selections and philosophy are too rigid and are outdated.

What I do think is required is a proper caluculated assessment of where we are right now. If that throws up the conclusion that a change of direction is needed then great. You've got to bear in mind that drastic change is likely to cost money that we don't have.

Junior
15/06/2012, 3:10 PM
I am delighted we got to this Final, very disappointed and saddened by the results (not aided by the 2 early goals) but embarrassed, no. Roll the sleeves up and get on with it and hopefully not concede early against the Italians and put in a much better performance, if capable of it.

Looking forward to that game and the new campaign already. I expect there will be a full review of what went wrong (there are huge bonuses for the FAI from UEFA for every point gained so they are hurting as well) but let's not forget the standard of the group we were in with a team made up of players from teams in the lower echelons of the Premiership and lower (and some with no clubs at all). The rugby team got a similar drubbing from the world champions.


Heard a correspondent on the Off The Ball Show last night stating you get €1m for a Group win. Not that I expect us to get a win against Italy but a €1m quid in the FAI coffers would surely help. Whether it be Grassroots or Traps/Delaneys Salaries to benefit Im not sure.........

Stuttgart88
15/06/2012, 3:11 PM
Those players are coming through despite the system, rather than because of it, imo. I guess we'll never know how many decent players never got the chance at underage level due to their (lack of) size, or how many that were sent over to England at 15 and sent home again disillusioned with football at 17 might have made it by the age of 20 or 21 if they'd stayed at home and kept at it and kept developing.


It'll always be a flawed document anyway, as the FAI don't have the power over their member leagues to implement a proper technical plan. How long would it take for the school boy leagues to disaffiliate if the FAI said there should be no leagues or cups for under 15's for example?I've no idea! I don't understand how the Irish system on the whole is connected and administered.

Wasn't Genesis 2 supposed to have addressed all that?

I'm aware of the "disconnect" between intermediate and senior football but I had always been under the impression that the bottom tiers of the pyramid were in tact. If not, is there scope for, say, the Irish Sports Council to intervene?

mark12345
15/06/2012, 3:53 PM
I don't throw in nonsense on a regular basis. We're all entitled to become impassioned and emotional but you constantly throw in stuff that's open to immediate rebuttal just because of how yoiu say it, whereas I, in all modesty, don't.

I am always open to debate as long as it's sensible and done rationally. I do have firm opinions but I am also flexible.

Of course I'm not happy with that kind of performance. I haven't said I am and your last point was juvenile.

I don't buy into the knee jerk reaction that radical change is required simply because I don't know what our approach really is. There is no transparency around the FAI technical development plan but every now and then a talented young player comes through the system.

A much bigger problem, in my suspicion, is the total economic chasm between our game and the English system and all the negative consequences this has for our game. Also, whilst I had an open mind on Trap and his methods I'm now more convinced that his methods, selections and philosophy are too rigid and are outdated.

What I do think is required is a proper caluculated assessment of where we are right now. If that throws up the conclusion that a change of direction is needed then great. You've got to bear in mind that drastic change is likely to cost money that we don't have.

You make a lot of good and honest points. My problem I guess, is that I tend to look at the Holy Grail and ask why we can't achieve that?

If Spain is the ultimate football team on the planet, then where are we in relation to them? I always ask myself that question. And the answer I come up with, is 'a million miles away' and even further than that after viewing last night's performance.

Then I look at the likes of Cyprus, Turkey, Israel - all countries we would have trounced 15 - 18 years ago. They've developed fantastically while our team has not, and as Liam Brady or Giles suggested on the panel last night, we might even have regressed.

I know the evidence of us qualifying for a major tournament suggests that we are in good shape. But the events of the last ten days, including Hungary, do not bare that out. Nor did our games against Russia in qualifying.

Like you say Stutts a calculated assessment of where we are right now needs to be done. I remember hearing a story about Holland, back in the day, and how they used to get hammered by the likes of Italy and Germany and Portugal. They resolved to put together a coaching system for their kids and the rest is history. France ditto.

We have reached that crossroads perhaps.

This message board is the best around. What I'd love to see is a grass roots petition to the FAI to at least become transparent (like you say) and for people to demand they (the FAI) set themselves some real targets regarding the development of our kids.

I'm also a firm believer that our top youngsters need to start looking away from English football.

OwlsFan
15/06/2012, 4:37 PM
.

Then I look at the likes of Cyprus, Turkey, Israel - all countries we would have trounced 15 - 18 years ago. They've developed fantastically while our team has not, and as Liam Brady or Giles suggested on the panel last night, we might even have regressed. .

We lost to Turkey in a play off 12 years ago.

Were Cyprus, Turkey or Israel at Euro 2012? Or Belgium, Scotland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Norway, Finland, Bulgaria, Bosnia etc etc.?

Once more we punched above our weight especially with the Premiership now awash with non-Uk/Irish players, the players are not coming though. If you want to look at why we are not as good as we once were, have a look at that. But despite it all we qualified and I won't repeat myself what I said about the games themselves.

If they are to look away from English football, where are they to look?

bennocelt
15/06/2012, 4:45 PM
So you are not too dissapointed then and are fully behind Trap for the next campaign?

Stuttgart88
15/06/2012, 4:56 PM
You'd swear it was all or nothing.

I think Trap's good at eeking out ugly results against tricky lesser sides, not good at getting big performances out against no. 2 seeds and above.

I do think it's dangerous to over react to a drubbing from Spain. I just picked up my boy from footy class. His coach is Brazilian (how's that for foresight?) and he says he felt Spain would have beaten them 4-0 too. OK, he's looking for next term's fees but...:)

I think it's hard to tell where we are because the coach doesn't trust his players to play, his selections are odd and unimaginative (Cox in midfield but no Gibson?), his tactics are out of date, we played good teams with key players not 100% and who played well below capability (Dunne, O'Shea and Given) so to say we're in desperate trouble is rash. Other factors disguised proper assessment of where we are.


Our U19s were semi-finalists last year (losing 5-0 to Spain!), our U17s got close. Some here cited Scotland's results against Spain. Scotland just lost 5-1to USA.

Macy
15/06/2012, 5:24 PM
I've no idea! I don't understand how the Irish system on the whole is connected and administered.

Wasn't Genesis 2 supposed to have addressed all that?

I'm aware of the "disconnect" between intermediate and senior football but I had always been under the impression that the bottom tiers of the pyramid were in tact. If not, is there scope for, say, the Irish Sports Council to intervene?
There's no pyramid - all elements are disconnected. schoolboy football sees itself feeding English teams academies or their own intermediate team. League of Ireland definitely isn't a focus.

tricky_colour
15/06/2012, 5:39 PM
Were we playing a pub side we could (probably) pass them of the park, or you can't male a silk purse out of a sows ear.

barney
15/06/2012, 5:52 PM
We lost to Turkey in a play off 12 years ago.

Were Cyprus, Turkey or Israel at Euro 2012? Or Belgium, Scotland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Norway, Finland, Bulgaria, Bosnia etc etc.?

Once more we punched above our weight especially with the Premiership now awash with non-Uk/Irish players, the players are not coming though. If you want to look at why we are not as good as we once were, have a look at that. But despite it all we qualified and I won't repeat myself what I said about the games themselves.

If they are to look away from English football, where are they to look?

You're one of the more rational posters on here and make some good points especially about the countries not at Euro 2012. That said, we shouldn't be just benchmarking ourselves against those sides or the top sides. What it comes down to is:

1. Are we happy with our performance and do we think it was as good as it could be? I don't think anyone could honestly answer yes to that.
2. Were there extenuating circumstances? Yes, there were some injuries but, even allowing for that, I don't believe that Spain or Croatia are as far ahead of us as we made them look.
3. Did the whole team, or most of them, underperform? If one or two players underperform, then you look at those players. If 6,7,8+ players underperform, you have to look at the manager. I would challenge anyone to argue that we didn't have that many players below their best.

Therefore, Trap is culpable. He is a great manager, a legend of the game, who did well to get us qualified (some luck notwithstanding) but he is primarily responsible in my book for a very, very disappointing showing at these championships.

I agree with you re the England thing but it goes deeper than football and is a cultural problem. How many 15-18 year olds speak another language like German, Dutch, Italian, French or Spanish and are talented footballers. Very few I'd bet. It would be so difficult at that age to go to a foreign country, on your own, where you don't speak the lingo and you're going into a different culture. We, as a country, aren't good at that. If a foreigner doesn't understand us in their country, our solution is usually to speak slower and louder.

Football wise, our culture (and England's) and mentality is not good which I've mentioned in another post.

mark12345
15/06/2012, 6:10 PM
We beat England, we drew with the Soviet Union and were only beaten by a poxy goal from the eventual champions eight minutes from time. We surpassed every expectation of us in that tournament.

You're missing the point completely. We had great success, agreed. But it was because we put other teams under pressure. The passing movements were half decent at times, but most chances we created was through the long ball game.

I want to see our lads keep the ball for minutes at a time, just like Spain. I know its pie in the sky right now. But let;s at least start to think that way as a team.

barney
15/06/2012, 6:14 PM
You're missing the point completely. We had great success, agreed. But it was because we put other teams under pressure. The passing movements were half decent at times, but most chances we created was through the long ball game.

I want to see our lads keep the ball for minutes at a time, just like Spain. I know its pie in the sky right now. But let;s at least start to think that way as a team.

I know what you're getting at but IMO you cannot compare Euro 88 with this mess.

mark12345
15/06/2012, 6:18 PM
We lost to Turkey in a play off 12 years ago.

Yeah, and a few years before that we hammered them 5-0 at Lansdowne Road. Looks like they improved immensely during this time wouldn't you say? And since then they went on to finish third in the world at the World Cup. We can't really boast that sort of improvement can we?

None of Cyrpus, Turkey or Israel were at Euro 2012. So what is your point?

Do you or do you not agree with my orignial point that these countries have improved immensely?

And if you do agree, then we must ask ourselves why we're not improving in stride with them.

CraftyToePoke
15/06/2012, 6:33 PM
I want to see our lads keep the ball for minutes at a time, just like Spain.

Or in the meantime, how about emulating Denmark even, who's midfield so far has contained a VFB Stuttgart and an Ajax player granted - (how vital these guys are for those clubs I am not sure), but also, a Club Bruges, a Brondby, an FC Nijmegen and an FC Midtjylland one against Portugal the other night, where they played their way back from 2-0 down and although they lost 3-2, were I thought admirable throughout, a pleasure to watch, effective, clever economic use of the ball in the middle third.

Stuttgart88
15/06/2012, 9:33 PM
The modern game with no back passes and no lunge tackles (ex-UK) emphasises skill and technique. Long ball and up and at 'em is redundant, by and large. Of course big no. 's still have a role but the game is about touch and movement and the best teams do this quicker than others. Another feature is that the good teams snap at ankles and win the ball back. We stand off it too much. Our shape is a relic of another era. We were simply out of date.

OwlsFan
17/06/2012, 12:44 AM
You're one of the more rational posters on here and make some good points especially about the countries not at Euro 2012. That said, we shouldn't be just benchmarking ourselves against those sides or the top sides. What it comes down to is:

1. Are we happy with our performance and do we think it was as good as it could be? I don't think anyone could honestly answer yes to that.
2. Were there extenuating circumstances? Yes, there were some injuries but, even allowing for that, I don't believe that Spain or Croatia are as far ahead of us as we made them look.
3. Did the whole team, or most of them, underperform? If one or two players underperform, then you look at those players. If 6,7,8+ players underperform, you have to look at the manager. I would challenge anyone to argue that we didn't have that many players below their best.

Therefore, Trap is culpable. He is a great manager, a legend of the game, who did well to get us qualified (some luck notwithstanding) but he is primarily responsible in my book for a very, very disappointing showing at these championships.

I agree with you re the England thing but it goes deeper than football and is a cultural problem. How many 15-18 year olds speak another language like German, Dutch, Italian, French or Spanish and are talented footballers. Very few I'd bet. It would be so difficult at that age to go to a foreign country, on your own, where you don't speak the lingo and you're going into a different culture. We, as a country, aren't good at that. If a foreigner doesn't understand us in their country, our solution is usually to speak slower and louder.

Football wise, our culture (and England's) and mentality is not good which I've mentioned in another post.

To answer your points:

1. The performances have not been good but the one against Croatia was actually better than in the 0-0 at Lansdowne. We got no breaks in the game, fouhgt back to 1-1 and then conceded a goal that should not have stood before half time. Shay then heads in the third. I think the scoreline didn't flatter us. It's hard to know what to say about the Spanish game. If we got something from the first game, the result may have been overlooked more than it was because 95% of people were talking about the first and last game and putting the middle one down as a loss. Again the early goal killed us (once more given away by us trying to play football in our own half). First half wasn't a total disaster, second half was despite Kenny Cunningham exclsuively showing clips from the second half about how we should play and press the ball, ignoring the fact that we conceded three in that half! Anyway, to answer your question, results very bad, performances not too bad the first game but disappointing in the second but not a total surprise.
2. The extenuating circumstances were the early goals in both games and that all 3 Croat goals with a pinch of luck could have been avoided. THat said, it is our own fault that we gave the ball away in our own half for both opening goals and that is the team's fault and arguably the manager for not really getting them out of the starting blocks or telling them not to fanny around (i.e. try to play football) in our own half for the first 15 minutes until we setlle in to the game.
3. Yes, most of the team has underperformed but I do put a lot down to that second Croat goal. Psychologically it was a killer. We had been doing ok up to that (nothing special but matching the Croats) but the timing and especially the nature of the goal was like a knife through the team's collective heart. The team was in a downward spiral since then. This "we were robbed" is deep in the Irish psyche (with good reason) and collectively I believe in their hearts they thought we're finish. The early goal against Spain just finished us off.

As for Trap himself, he irritates the hell out of me with his selections and makes a rod for his own back with some of them. I have an Italian friend who said that this is what he does. The trouble is if he picked Coleman and McLean on either flank as many wished he had before the tournament, this would not have stopped us conceding early goals or changed history. We should play a different style is the mantra of many. I saw us trying it and 85% of the time we got no further than passing back to Given (if we weren't conceding possession and ending up in them scoring). Different midfielders perhaps. Wes Hoolahan comes to mind and I think he would have been the ideal 5th midfielder for the game against Spain. We would still have conceded the early goal though. Trap got us to the Finals and almost got us to the previous one. Whether Paul Jewell (the forgotton choice of Dunphy/Giles) would have I very much doubt. He is doing something right with the 2 campaign unbeaten away run and I am not sure there is anyone who could do much better but he needs to do something fast to win back the public, whose support was tenuous even before Finals.

mark12345
17/06/2012, 3:09 AM
The modern game with no back passes and no lunge tackles (ex-UK) emphasises skill and technique. Long ball and up and at 'em is redundant, by and large. Of course big no. 's still have a role but the game is about touch and movement and the best teams do this quicker than others. Another feature is that the good teams snap at ankles and win the ball back. We stand off it too much. Our shape is a relic of another era. We were simply out of date.

All very relevant and very good points. You can see it, I can see it and I suspect most people on here can see it. Can the Irish management take on board these type of comments and resolve to change the style of the team? Let's hope so.

ShamrockIreland
17/06/2012, 10:48 AM
All very relevant and very good points. You can see it, I can see it and I suspect most people on here can see it. Can the Irish management take on board these type of comments and resolve to change the style of the team? Let's hope so.


Not a chance his fabled SYSTEM will not be on the go come the World Cup qualifiers.We could lose half the first team and probably be better at this stage. Whelans inability to pass or defend has to be addressed. We can all talk all we want here but Delaney and Trap will have to go if the same old squad and style of play is in evidence again come September. I cannot believe how many of you here fell hook line and sinker for Traps silver tongue. We needed to build for the future but all we have is McShane and Green in our squad. I'd rip it up and start again the first thing getting rid of Trap he's never going to change.

third policeman
17/06/2012, 11:25 AM
Not a chance his fabled SYSTEM will not be on the go come the World Cup qualifiers.We could lose half the first team and probably be better at this stage. Whelans inability to pass or defend has to be addressed. We can all talk all we want here but Delaney and Trap will have to go if the same old squad and style of play is in evidence again come September. I cannot believe how many of you here fell hook line and sinker for Traps silver tongue. We needed to build for the future but all we have is McShane and Green in our squad. I'd rip it up and start again the first thing getting rid of Trap he's never going to change.


Spot on Shamrock. I was more depressed by Delaney's ongoing confidence in Trapp than I was by the Spain result. The defeat was predictable and the performance entirely as expected, but the prospect of enduring another Trapp campaign can only give comfort to masochists and the deluded.

OwlsFan
17/06/2012, 4:10 PM
Ok, so the target for any new manager is not only to qualify for the finals but to do so with attractive football and then when to get to the Finals to also do well at the Finals and against the world champions and No. 8 in the world otherwise he is a failure? Any thoughts on who this person may be ?

shakermaker1982
17/06/2012, 4:27 PM
Well you might as well aim high!

I just want common sense football. If your going to hit long aimless balls to your front two then you don't play Robbie Keane.

I want a manager to pick players on form.

I want a manager who will realise that 4-4-2 is outdated in the international arena.

We've got 18 months left of the Trap & then it's time to build for 2018, 2020 & 2022.

Stuttgart88
17/06/2012, 4:29 PM
C'mon Owlie, you speak as if eveything's an absolute. We were also pish poor against Hungary, Slovakia at home, Czechs, Norway and quite a few others. We stand off teams and use the ball badly when we have it. Full backs aren't allowed forward.

Now, I'm not saying I know the answers but I think the dogs on the street can see that our rigid 442 has had its day in European football and I don't believe Trap is prepared to make adjustments. I hope I'm wrong. Trap is definitely due some criticism, as are the players who played crap.

ShamrockIreland
17/06/2012, 5:23 PM
Ok, so the target for any new manager is not only to qualify for the finals but to do so with attractive football and then when to get to the Finals to also do well at the Finals and against the world champions and No. 8 in the world otherwise he is a failure? Any thoughts on who this person may be ?

Owls you know as well as I that Trap will not be sacked unless the World Cup qualifying starts badly. If we are to look for a new manager for us it would have to be a manager who is not afraid of rebuilding the squad like Big Mick had to all those years ago. This is all hypothetical but Hiddink or a man of that calibre wouldn't be bad.

Stuttgart88
17/06/2012, 5:56 PM
If Trap was to be replaced I'd prefer an Irishman. Stuff Hiddink, we couldn't afford him anyway. International football should be about each country'sc system against the others'. That includes manager.

BonnieShels
17/06/2012, 6:09 PM
I'd take Hiddink.

But I would also take McDermott and Hughton.

Let's worry about the new manager when Trap goes. For now we have one of the greatest managers ever who made a dogs dinner of his selection v Spain.

mark12345
17/06/2012, 11:29 PM
I'd take Hiddink. But I would also take McDermott and Hughton. Let's worry about the new manager when Trap goes. For now we have one of the greatest managers ever who made a dogs dinner of his selection v Spain.

Let's see Trap start tomorrow against Italy. He needs to start now, can't be waiting any more. He needs to change the team into one which plays proper football (on the ground from defence through midfield and one which can string 10 passes together in the opposition half).

If the lads show us tomorrow that they can do something like that, or at least try to, then keep him. If it's more hoof ball and chasing shadows for 70 minutes then the clock should start ticking on Giovanni.

mark12345
17/06/2012, 11:42 PM
Or in the meantime, how about emulating Denmark even, who's midfield so far has contained a VFB Stuttgart and an Ajax player granted - (how vital these guys are for those clubs I am not sure), but also, a Club Bruges, a Brondby, an FC Nijmegen and an FC Midtjylland one against Portugal the other night, where they played their way back from 2-0 down and although they lost 3-2, were I thought admirable throughout, a pleasure to watch, effective, clever economic use of the ball in the middle third.

All very true.

ShamrockIreland
18/06/2012, 4:19 PM
I'd rather Hughton if it were to be one of them at least he had his time as assistant under Brian Kerr. How can Trap change cos he won't and will drag the team down until the fans turn on him like they did on Stan etc. He's going nowhere until he has his fat cheque in his back pocket. I honestly think he's too old for the job now. Would prefer Tardelli at this point

brine3
18/06/2012, 4:53 PM
Is that the same Hiddink that saw his Turkey stuffed 3-0 at home in the playoffs by Croatia?

Charlie Darwin
18/06/2012, 5:25 PM
Is that the same Hiddink that saw his Turkey stuffed 3-0 at home in the playoffs by Croatia?
Very nice :)

ShamrockIreland
18/06/2012, 5:59 PM
Is that the same Hiddink that saw his Turkey stuffed 3-0 at home in the playoffs by Croatia?

No it's his brother :rolleyes:. Turkey getting stuffed by Croatia how ironic wouldn't you say. I'm sure he'd find a better midfielder than Glenn Whelan or Green