eirebhoy
29/06/2004, 4:59 PM
The best partner for Keane up front is Morrison and he really isn't international standard. At the same time, we're spoilt for choice in midfield. I know Keane isn't suited to playing the lone striker because he drifts out wide but surely he could change his style of play to suit the team. Larsson is the type of player that never sticks around the box but he has played up front on his own plenty of times. Larsson would probably be more suited the the role because he's a good header of the ball but what about Henry? He's certainly no better than Robbie at heading a ball and has also played the lone striker role regularly.
Imagine:
------------------Robbie------------------
-------------------Reid--------------------
Duff------Holland?---------Keane------Miller
From watching Reid playing for Forest and Ireland I think his best position is behind the striker(s). Miller's best performances in the CL have actually come from the right of midfield. Keane and Holland/Kilbane/other in the middle should keep it solid.
OK, now comes the question, what would Robbie do without the supply of Morrison? Since Kerr took over Morrison has played 12, scored 2 (against Scotland and Australia) and 1 assist (to Holland against Romania). 5 of Keane's 6 goals under Kerr have been (really) close range (the other was against Holland). His assists have come from Carr, Carsley, Reid and Lee (only one of his goals have been assisted by his partner).
Therefore Keane's goal rate shouldn't be affected by changing his style to playing up front on his own as they have nearly all come from passes inside the box. Reid, Miller and Duff would all be supplying him with the balls. Having a player like Reid behind Keane would only raise his shots to goal ratio. If Keane ever decided to go wandering (which I doubt he would), surely one of the other 5 midfielders would be up in the box in case of a break.
Surely a bit of experimentation against Bulgaria won't do any harm.
Opinions?
Imagine:
------------------Robbie------------------
-------------------Reid--------------------
Duff------Holland?---------Keane------Miller
From watching Reid playing for Forest and Ireland I think his best position is behind the striker(s). Miller's best performances in the CL have actually come from the right of midfield. Keane and Holland/Kilbane/other in the middle should keep it solid.
OK, now comes the question, what would Robbie do without the supply of Morrison? Since Kerr took over Morrison has played 12, scored 2 (against Scotland and Australia) and 1 assist (to Holland against Romania). 5 of Keane's 6 goals under Kerr have been (really) close range (the other was against Holland). His assists have come from Carr, Carsley, Reid and Lee (only one of his goals have been assisted by his partner).
Therefore Keane's goal rate shouldn't be affected by changing his style to playing up front on his own as they have nearly all come from passes inside the box. Reid, Miller and Duff would all be supplying him with the balls. Having a player like Reid behind Keane would only raise his shots to goal ratio. If Keane ever decided to go wandering (which I doubt he would), surely one of the other 5 midfielders would be up in the box in case of a break.
Surely a bit of experimentation against Bulgaria won't do any harm.
Opinions?