osarusan
23/07/2010, 12:45 PM
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2010/0723/1224275297852.html?via=mr
Has anybody else seen this story of an Arab Israeli who met a woman while working as a motorbike rider, pretended to be a Jew interested in a relationship, and had consensual sex in a deserted building?
Once she found out he wasn't what he said he was (and was a married Arab Israeli), she filed a complaint of rape, and he's been found guilty of this.
Two years ago a chance encounter in the centre of Jerusalem with an Israeli woman, who has not been identified publicly, resulted in sexual intercourse in a nearby deserted building. Kashur told the woman he was a Jewish bachelor seeking a long-term relationship.
When she found out the truth she pressed rape charges.
although I'm not without sympathy for the woman, this is a pretty dodgy conviction in my eyes. It really brings a new aspect (to my legally untrained eye) to any definition of rape.
Passing down the rape verdict, the judges wrote: “If she hadn’t thought the accused was a Jewish bachelor interested in a serious romantic relationship, she would not have co-operated.” The judges argued the court was “obliged to protect the public interest from sophisticated, smooth-tongued criminals who can deceive innocent victims at an unbearable price – the sanctity of their bodies and souls”.Doesn't a precedent like this mean that any guy who tells a lie (about job, finances, for example) to get a girl to go to bed with him could be prosecuted in the same way?
The affair dominated Israeli radio chat shows this week. Many of the listeners condemned the ruling as racist and asked would such a harsh sentence have been passed down if the accused was a Jewish Israeli and had tricked an Arab woman?
This supports my original opinion that he is being punished for being an Arab who 'defiled' a Jewish woman.
Has anybody else seen this story of an Arab Israeli who met a woman while working as a motorbike rider, pretended to be a Jew interested in a relationship, and had consensual sex in a deserted building?
Once she found out he wasn't what he said he was (and was a married Arab Israeli), she filed a complaint of rape, and he's been found guilty of this.
Two years ago a chance encounter in the centre of Jerusalem with an Israeli woman, who has not been identified publicly, resulted in sexual intercourse in a nearby deserted building. Kashur told the woman he was a Jewish bachelor seeking a long-term relationship.
When she found out the truth she pressed rape charges.
although I'm not without sympathy for the woman, this is a pretty dodgy conviction in my eyes. It really brings a new aspect (to my legally untrained eye) to any definition of rape.
Passing down the rape verdict, the judges wrote: “If she hadn’t thought the accused was a Jewish bachelor interested in a serious romantic relationship, she would not have co-operated.” The judges argued the court was “obliged to protect the public interest from sophisticated, smooth-tongued criminals who can deceive innocent victims at an unbearable price – the sanctity of their bodies and souls”.Doesn't a precedent like this mean that any guy who tells a lie (about job, finances, for example) to get a girl to go to bed with him could be prosecuted in the same way?
The affair dominated Israeli radio chat shows this week. Many of the listeners condemned the ruling as racist and asked would such a harsh sentence have been passed down if the accused was a Jewish Israeli and had tricked an Arab woman?
This supports my original opinion that he is being punished for being an Arab who 'defiled' a Jewish woman.