View Full Version : What flag if any was used....
sligobhoy67
23/07/2009, 8:54 AM
to represent the IFA team post-1921 and pre-1950 when it was still organised on an All Ireland basis. Any help or evidence appricated.
Sheridan
23/07/2009, 9:01 AM
I'm sure I've seen a St. Patrick's Cross (red saltire on white background) used to represent the pre-partition team somewhere, but that may be a retrospective convention.
I would hazard a guess at the Union Flag but no evidence for this other than it would have been the country's official flag.
John83
23/07/2009, 9:56 AM
I'm sure I've seen a St. Patrick's Cross (red saltire on white background) used to represent the pre-partition team somewhere, but that may be a retrospective convention.
I would have thought so too, but as David points out, it's never had official status there.
EalingGreen
23/07/2009, 10:01 AM
Interesting question. Tbh, despite our near-obsession with flags in NI(!), I'm not sure there will have been any flag flown to represent the IFA (officially, at least).
David's guess at the Union Flag might seem plausible, except that during the period in question, the IFA only played British Championship games versus Eng/Scot/Wales, therefore the UF would have been a bit pointless, seeing as it is just as representative of their opponents as the IFA. Perhaps the UF only was flown at all British Championship matches?
Anyhow, the IFA were not members of FIFA until just after WWII, nor entrants into the World Cup, so there was no need to demonstrate their individual identity to anyone outside the UK.
And the NI flag (more properly known as the "Ulster Banner") was not devised until 1953.
Curiously enough, I think I read read recently that the IFA adopted a shirt badge incorporating shamrocks (around 1930?), in order to re-emphasise their (All-)Ireland credentials vis-a-vis the FAIFS. Not unlike the current Ireland Rugby shirt badge, iirc this was v.similar to the FAIFS badge. I can find out for sure, if you like.
Having said all that, I strongly suspect that Linfield flew the UF over Windsor during that period (they certainly do today) - it might not have been taken down for NI/Ireland games of the time.
Currently, the only flags flown at NI games are the NI flag, the national flag of the visitors, and the UEFA or FIFA flag for European Championship or World Cup games.
ifk101
23/07/2009, 10:06 AM
..... it's never had official status there.
But the IFA saw itself as representing Ireland and not just Northern Ireland during the said time period. The IFA wasn't offically part of FIFA during those years either so perhaps the issue of a flag was never an issue - ie the IFA team was more of an exhibition team and, as such, did not necessarily need a flag.
EalingGreen
23/07/2009, 3:38 PM
The IFA wasn't offically part of FIFA during those years either
The IFA wasn't a member of FIFA full stop (i.e. officially or unofficially).
perhaps the issue of a flag was never an issue
Covered in my earlier post.
ie the IFA team was more of an exhibition team and, as such, did not necessarily need a flag.
"Exhibition"? Actually, Ireland were founder members of the World's oldest international competition, the British ("Home") Championship.
Indeed the IFA staged the world's first ever competitive international football match, in Belfast in January 1884 versus Scotland*.
* - I'd appreciate if you didn't enquire about the score...:o
ifk101
24/07/2009, 7:26 AM
"Exhibition"? Actually, Ireland were founder members of the World's oldest international competition, the British ("Home") Championship.
Indeed the IFA staged the world's first ever competitive international football match, in Belfast in January 1884 versus Scotland*.
While the British Home Championship would be considered an international competition in the present day, during the 1920s up to the 1950s it was a domestic competition. This is because none of the British teams were members the governing body FIFA during this time and, as such, not recognised as international football teams. As the British Home Championship was in effect a competition between domestic "home" regions/nations, there perhaps was no need for the IFA team to be represented by a flag.
EalingGreen
24/07/2009, 10:22 AM
While the British Home Championship would be considered an international competition in the present day, during the 1920s up to the 1950s it was a domestic competition. This is because none of the British teams were members the governing body FIFA during this time and, as such, not recognised as international football teams. As the British Home Championship was in effect a competition between domestic "home" regions/nations, there perhaps was no need for the IFA team to be represented by a flag.
Are you trying to say that when eg in 1923, England played Belgium home and away, France away and Sweden away (twice) that these are not recognised as full internationals, with caps awarded to both teams etc, because England were not a subscribing member of FIFA?
Utter Garbage!
http://www.rsssf.com/tablese/eng-intres20.html
ifk101
24/07/2009, 10:49 AM
Are you trying to say that when eg in 1923, England played Belgium home and away, France away and Sweden away (twice) that these are not recognised as full internationals, with caps awarded to both teams etc, because England were not a subscribing member of FIFA?
Utter Garbage!
http://www.rsssf.com/tablese/eng-intres20.html
Think Basque Country and Catalonia if it's difficult for you to understand. :rolleyes:
EalingGreen
24/07/2009, 11:34 AM
Think Basque Country and Catalonia if it's difficult for you to understand. :rolleyes:
Balls! FIFA recognises the "Home" Countries as having established international football during the last three decades of the 19th Century:
http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/history/fifa/historyfifa1.html
"When the idea of founding an international football federation began taking shape in Europe, the intention of those involved was to recognise the role of the English who had founded their Football Association back in 1863. Hirschman, secretary of the Netherlands Football Association, turned to the Football Association. Its secretary, FJ Wall, did accept the proposal but progress stalled while waiting for the Executive Committee of the Football Association, the International FA Board and the associations of Scotland, Wales and Ireland to give their opinion about the matter"
Or are you claiming that international football only existed post-1904? :rolleyes:
ifk101
24/07/2009, 12:01 PM
FIFA recognises the "Home" Countries as having established international football during the last three decades of the 19th Century:
You'll be sourcing events in 12th Century China next .... :rolleyes:
Or are you claiming that international football only existed post-1904? :rolleyes:
No. :rolleyes:
sligobhoy67
06/08/2009, 10:07 AM
so is it safe to say that there is no conclusive proof either way that a flag on any description was used either in an official or unofficial capacity?
EalingGreen
06/08/2009, 12:44 PM
(Originally Posted by EalingGreen)
"FIFA recognises the 'Home' Countries as having established international football during the last three decades of the 19th Century"
You'll be sourcing events in 12th Century China next...
Why would I do that? :confused: I'm quite happy with FIFA's own website as authority for what I'm saying.
(Originally Posted by EalingGreen)
"Or are you claiming that international football only existed post-1904?"
No. :rolleyes:
Therefore if international football matches were played pre-1904 and were recognised as such by FIFA, then such matches are as "official" as any other, including international competitive fixtures between the four "home" nations in the British Championship?
EalingGreen
06/08/2009, 12:45 PM
so is it safe to say that there is no conclusive proof either way that a flag on any description was used either in an official or unofficial capacity?
That's about the height of it(!), though if I had to plump for something, I'd guess that "David" got it right in post #3 (above).
gspain
06/08/2009, 12:52 PM
I don't know re the flag.
I need to confirm with the Malcolm Brodie book but the IFA did play games other than British championship during the period.
They toured Norway in 1922 and played 2 games at least 1 was always recognized as a full International. They also played in France around that time.
They played South Africa in 1924 which is considered a full International by South Africa and was reclassified as such by the IFA in the past 10 years.
In 1947 the 4 home nations bailed out FIFA by playing a game at Hampden - a joint team met the Rest of Europe - our Johnny Carey captained the rest of Europe. Part of the deal has involved a permanent vice president of FIFA for the home nations.
EalingGreen
06/08/2009, 1:36 PM
I don't know re the flag.
I need to confirm with the Malcolm Brodie book but the IFA did play games other than British championship during the period.
They toured Norway in 1922 and played 2 games at least 1 was always recognized as a full International. They also played in France around that time.
They played South Africa in 1924 which is considered a full International by South Africa and was reclassified as such by the IFA in the past 10 years.
In 1947 the 4 home nations bailed out FIFA by playing a game at Hampden - a joint team met the Rest of Europe - our Johnny Carey captained the rest of Europe. Part of the deal has involved a permanent vice president of FIFA for the home nations.
Good points, Gspain. If you've not already seen it, I'm sure you'll find the following from JCD's (excellent) Blog to be both comprehensive and reliable:
http://nifootball.blogspot.com/2006/08/disputed-internationals.html
P.S. Re. the UK vs Rest of Europe game in 1947, Johnny Carey could also be argued to be "ours" (i.e. NI's), just as you have a claim to "our" Jackie 'Sausage' Vernon, who was in opposition to Carey that day:
http://nifootball.blogspot.com/2006/08/johnny-carey.html
http://nifootball.blogspot.com/2006/12/jackie-vernon.html
Tony Soprano
06/08/2009, 4:48 PM
ealing green what's you take on creating an all ireland team now is there steadfast opposition to it in the protestant community ?
EalingGreen
06/08/2009, 6:00 PM
ealing green what's you take on creating an all ireland team now I'm ready to listen, the moment the FAI realises its mistake and applies to come back into the loving arms of the Irish Football Association - "Original and (George) Best" ;)
is there steadfast opposition to it in the protestant community ?Nothing personal, TS, but with my history on this Board, if I were to even to start to answer that point, I'd not only have the thread closed quicker than you can type "Dahamsta", but I might even be putting the entire Board in peril! :)
P.S. I wouldn't dream of asking you to trawl through my previous posts on such matters - you've never done me any harm! - but if you're really interested, pm me and I might reply if/when I get time.
ifk101
07/08/2009, 8:59 AM
I'm ready to listen, the moment the FAI realises its mistake and applies to come back into the loving arms of the Irish Football Association - "Original and (George) Best" ;)
I'm sure the FAI is content with the eligibility of its position as Ireland's football association. :cool:
Tipp Townie
12/08/2009, 1:32 PM
Without wanting to hijack SligoBhoy's thread, a quick flag-related question for Ealing Green and any other NI fans-
I noticed a while back in a photo from the famous win over Spain in '82 that the team name ("Irland de Nord" or summat like that) was represented on the big scoreboard on a background of the tricolour! Sorry i havent got any pics to hand. (And with relevance to the thread, i'm not sure if the tricolour was 'flown' anywhere around the ground.)
Could well have been a wind up by the hosts, rather than stupidity/laziness. I guess given the basic graphics on the scoreboard it would have been very difficult to replicate the NI flag itself, but still!
I just wondered if this was noticed by the NI fans at the time, and if so, whether it caused any controversy. Probably not given that yous were probably too busy celebrating at the time!
Sorry, i warned you that it was a geeky post..:o
Da Real Rover
15/08/2009, 10:09 AM
ealing green what's you take on creating an all ireland team now is there steadfast opposition to it in the protestant community ?
Id hazard a guess at yes.
Maybe im way off the mark but I always interpreted that Domestic Football in Ireland as a whole is a different animal to the likes of Rugby or GAA in its supporter base which leads us to understand how Football has not overcome partitionist splits like the GAA or Rugby.
That being where the GAA predominantly comes from a history of rural support primarily being of the Nationalist variety because of its much documented history of being entangled with cultural nationalism at the turn of the century. So therefore those who support GAA North and South of the border are largely cut from the same cloth and therefore an All Ireland League and championship has little or no resistance.
Then with Rugby which historically has its roots in the upper class of the Island (bar Limerick of course), both protestant and catholic has much the same situation as the GAA. Most of the wars, skirmishes and disputes in this Island have historically been waged through the working class of both the Catholic and Protestant communities (with some obvious noteable exceptions) so thus there would not be the same emnity between the respective creeds in the upper class, obviously there will be an element but not to such an extent to make an All Ireland Rugby League unworkable.
Then we come to Domestic Football which historically in Ireland has its roots in the urban working class of Ireland. Both Protestant and Catholic. As the majority of wars and disputes have been waged through the working class, even the previous 30 years of troubles its understandable where there will be an emnity between both sides of the divide who participate in Football. When most people in the south hear of The Bogside, The Falls, Short Strand etc they think Republican areas or the like, when in reality they are working class areas. Just as when people down here hear of the Shankill, Mount Vernon or the Fountain they think Loyalist when in reality they are the working class areas of the other side of the divide. Thus it only makes sense that there will continue to be a partitionist league and partitionist National Team in Ireland with the historical backdrop of Irish Domestic Football supporters.
There are of course exceptions to the rule and this is far from 100% accurate, merely dealing with generalisations of course, but it certainly helps me understand the partitionist divide in football in Ireland.
gspain
15/08/2009, 11:48 AM
I think it has less to do with class rather than the fact that football split into 2 associations at the time of independence for what is now the Republic of Ireland.
Football has strong middle class roots anyway on this island with gentleman amateur teams such as Bohemians and Cliftonville.
Peter Byrne's official history of the FAI 1996 (updated edition due shortly - hopefully) is generally accepted as being accurate on this. There are extracts posted on this site if you care to search.
The IFA and other "home" associations did everything to stop the FAI as they considered the IFA as the governing body for football on this island even post independence. In 1950 FIFA finally forced the IFA to stop picking southern born players. FIFA had to intervene again in 1954 to decide on the term "Ireland".
NI fans are very proud of their team and certainly don't want to lose it which in reality is what would happen. They see us as their main rivals and hence a merger to them is the equivalent of us merging with England.
Gather round
15/08/2009, 12:00 PM
what's you take on creating an all ireland team now
Totally opposed. Not interested in merging with other teams. See threads passim.
is there steadfast opposition to it in the protestant community ?
There's steadfast opposition within the Northern Ireland fans community.
Da Real Rover
15/08/2009, 1:47 PM
Football has strong middle class roots anyway on this island with gentleman amateur teams such as Bohemians and Cliftonville.
Indeed many clubs were formed along those lines.
But as those clubs grew you can trace the majority of their support base and where they priamrily hailed from.
With Cliftonville historically they pulled support from the North Belfast/Ardoyne Nationalist community which as im sure you are well aware is predominantly working class. Now of course its different as they pull alot of support from West Belfast also, the collapse of Belfast Celtic has alot to do with that.
As with the likes of Bohs which grew out of the Phibsborough area and the North Dublin Area which is also predominantly working class.
In fact you will find the vast majority of Domestic Football Grounds are actually located in working class areas as this is where they garnered the overwhelming amount of their support.
Gather round
15/08/2009, 2:08 PM
With Cliftonville historically they pulled support from the North Belfast/Ardoyne Nationalist community which as im sure you are well aware is predominantly working class. Now of course its different as they pull alot of support from West Belfast also, the collapse of Belfast Celtic has alot to do with that
When I started watching Irish League football (about 1970) they had a lot of unionist support. Much of which was middle class as GSpain suggests. I went to Cliftonville primary school (next door to the ground). The area was more mixed then than now.
Predator
15/08/2009, 2:33 PM
Totally opposed. Not interested in merging with other teams. See threads passim.
There's steadfast opposition within the Northern Ireland fans community.
OT but...
Why is that? If it can be done with no problems in the rugby, why is there such opposition with the soccer teams?
Gather round
15/08/2009, 3:00 PM
OT but...
Why is that? If it can be done with no problems in the rugby, why is there such opposition with the soccer teams?
GSpain has already answered your question. We (NI fans) support NI- we're not interested in merging with anyone else any more than you are in fielding a joint team with England. It is international sport, after all. As for Britain having four international teams, I'll admit it's an oddity but one that works. And less anachronistic in recent years as other large European countries have broken into smaller units.
You'll have to ask someone else about rugby union- I've no real interest in or knowledge of it.
I talk to fans from the South when watching the Irish cricket team. Everyone largely gets on fine, but I'll be honest I'd prefer it was a NI side. Incidentally only three of the 15 man Irish squad in this year's cricket World Cup grew up in the South.
EalingGreen
15/08/2009, 3:15 PM
(To answer Tony Soprano's earlier query) It's nearly 40 years since I was first taken to watch NI. I was too young to know or care about religion or politics etc.
I became a fan then and have been a fan since, during which time they have been sometimes sh1te, frequently mediocre and just occasionally sublime.
I have no desire to see my team disappear into some merged entity, whether that be a United Ireland team, a United Kingdom team or a United-any-other-feckin-combination team.
It's my team, I welcome anyone else who wants to join me in supporting them, but am not bothered by people who choose to follow another team, or none, since that is their loss (imo).
And whilst I have at least a passing interest in other sports, such as rugby and cricket, neither those or any other can ever get me anything like as excited as Our Wee Country's team.
Others may nor understand or agree with me on this - fine, that's their prerogative, just as it is mine to feel as I do.
That's it, really.
P.S. Re Tony S's reference to the views of "the Protestant community" on such matters, I couldn't give a fig about that "community" or any other which identifies itself around the tribal divisions of NI. When it comes to football, the only "tribe" I'm interested in is the "Green and White Army" and I've yet to meet one other member whose opinions vary significantly from my own on this topic.
Gather round
15/08/2009, 3:24 PM
See you in Katowice for a swift half before the game EG (our party decided to stay in Krakow so we're bussing in, late afternoon).
EalingGreen
15/08/2009, 3:26 PM
Without wanting to hijack SligoBhoy's thread, a quick flag-related question for Ealing Green and any other NI fans-
I noticed a while back in a photo from the famous win over Spain in '82 that the team name ("Irland de Nord" or summat like that) was represented on the big scoreboard on a background of the tricolour! Sorry i havent got any pics to hand. (And with relevance to the thread, i'm not sure if the tricolour was 'flown' anywhere around the ground.)
Could well have been a wind up by the hosts, rather than stupidity/laziness. I guess given the basic graphics on the scoreboard it would have been very difficult to replicate the NI flag itself, but still!
I just wondered if this was noticed by the NI fans at the time, and if so, whether it caused any controversy. Probably not given that yous were probably too busy celebrating at the time!
Sorry, i warned you that it was a geeky post..:o
Yep, you're right, the scoreboard did display a Tricolour for at least part of that game. I doubt very much that it was a wind-up, more likely just an oversight by some dopey Scoreboard operator.
And no, no-one I've ever met has ever got the slightest bit bothered by it. As for myself, quite frankly the Scoreboard Operator could have been knocking off my missus at the time and I wouldn't have cared.
EalingGreen
15/08/2009, 3:40 PM
See you in Katowice for a swift half before the game EG (our party decided to stay in Krakow so we're bussing in, late afternoon).
Look forward to it. :)
Apparently there will be a "Fans Zone" organised in Katowice before the game with bars etc, from where we will all be bussed directly to the stadium. We will be held back for an hour after the game, when buses will run us back to the fans' zone (or possibly also our hotels in the centre of Katowice). Jim Reilly and the Amalgamation of NISC's are "on-the-ball" over this, in conjunction with the two FA's and the local police.
The IFA have requested up to 1,500 tickets, though are only expecting a bit over a thousand to travel. (I suspect the trouble around the Belfast game has deterred quite a few fans, especially the older/female/kids etc.)
Predator
16/08/2009, 6:50 PM
The IFA have requested up to 1,500 tickets, though are only expecting a bit over a thousand to travel. (I suspect the trouble around the Belfast game has deterred quite a few fans, especially the older/female/kids etc.)
You guys would need to be careful. Have you seen the Ross Kemp episode on Polish football hooliganism?!
Here. (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8831046128904338535&ei=UFSISornGpXS-AbhnfGKBA&q=ross+kemp+on+gangs+polish+football&hl=en)
I remember watching it last year. The first sentence and the accompanying footage are unsettling!
Tipp Townie
02/09/2009, 11:12 AM
As for myself, quite frankly the Scoreboard Operator could have been knocking off my missus at the time and I wouldn't have cared.
Hahaha, made me laugh.
Thanks for the response EG.
Bluebeard
02/09/2009, 11:28 AM
Yep, you're right, the scoreboard did display a Tricolour for at least part of that game. I doubt very much that it was a wind-up, more likely just an oversight by some dopey Scoreboard operator.
And no, no-one I've ever met has ever got the slightest bit bothered by it. As for myself, quite frankly the Scoreboard Operator could have been knocking off my missus at the time and I wouldn't have cared.
This for me most epitomises why there is opposition to the idea of a single football team subsuming both and calling itself Ireland. As the name seems to mean the South for most people, I suppose one could liken it to how the Southerners among us would feel if all five island teams were lumped into the one and called "The British Isles".
third policeman
03/09/2009, 4:01 PM
GSpain has already answered your question. We (NI fans) support NI- we're not interested in merging with anyone else any more than you are in fielding a joint team with England..
I am seriously not trying to revive a futile discussion about the merits of a united football team, but your suggested parallels avoid one significant and differentiating fact. A very large section of the NI population dont identify with the NI football team rightly or wrongly, they support RoI and we all meet them on a regular basis at RoI games. This worries me, because contrary to your and EG's blinkered and unsustainable platitudes about the non-sectarian ambience at NI games, football on this Ireland has become polarised in an increasingly ugly way. (This includes RoI fans abusing Rangers players and hard-line Republicans in the North wearing RoI shirts as some sort of alternative fashion accessory to black berets). Perhaps a united team is not the answer but niether is Panglossian complacency.
Gather round
06/09/2009, 9:51 PM
perhaps a united team is not the answer but niether is Panglossian complacency
TP, equally I don't really want to revive a sneering match, but spare us the patronising literary criticism. It's pretentious and irrelevant to the discussion.
My attitude is neither blinkered not unsustainable. I've no problem with NI based football fans supporting the South, as I've said on here and elsewhere repeatedly. Similarly I know the ambience at NI games from going to them, clearly it has improved hugely in recent years. But I'm not complacent at all, again as repeated regularly here.
Stop stirring, eh?
PS on a slightly lighter note (I hope), we were entertained in the stadium by two Polish fans with Celtic jerseys and a tricolor. And by a local steward in a Rangers jersey ;)
ifk101
07/09/2009, 9:48 AM
You need to understand Gather round that third policeman is a "supporter" of both teams. Third policeman can identify with both teams and assumes that deep-down everyone else can. What he fails to understand is that no genuine football would wish the disbandment of their team.
third policeman
07/09/2009, 10:43 AM
You need to understand Gather round that third policeman is a "supporter" of both teams. Third policeman can identify with both teams and assumes that deep-down everyone else can. What he fails to understand is that no genuine football would wish the disbandment of their team.
You are right I was brought up to support both teams and its hard to give up on that instinct. So well done to NI. Great performance against Poland ands the prospect of two Irish teams in South Africa is absolutely fantastic.
However you are wrong that I have ever suggested disbanding the NI team. I did once suggest that an All-Ireland team might participate in the proposed Celtic cup competition as a way of allowing football fans in the North to actually cheer for the same team for once. This was and continues to be motivated not by a desire to see the end of the NI team, but see an end to the alarming and hostile polarization of footballing loyalties on a sectarian basis.
It might be a stupid and niaive idea but it that's the case it should be countered without misrepresentation or simplifaction.
ifk101
07/09/2009, 11:31 AM
This was and continues to be motivated not by a desire to see the end of the NI team, but see an end to the alarming and hostile polarization of footballing loyalties on a sectarian basis.
It might be a stupid and niaive idea but it that's the case it should be countered without misrepresentation or simplifaction.
Yes it is a stupid and naive idea because the issue you speak of is not induced by football but has found expression through football. Ultimately this is a social issue and beyond the premise of a football forum.
Gather round
07/09/2009, 11:32 AM
So well done to NI. Great performance against Poland ands the prospect of two Irish teams in South Africa is absolutely fantastic
Cheers. I am quite confident about Wednesday, actually.
I did once suggest that an All-Ireland team might participate in the proposed Celtic cup competition as a way of allowing football fans in the North to actually cheer for the same team for once
They can support ManU and Liverpool together in 50 matches every season. Of course it isn't the same thing, but they're hardly losing an inalienable right to watch football.
Over lunch on Saturday I was chatting to the NI Newry boys (IIRC you're from the town/ area?). They're happy with the current set-up, trust me.
This was and continues to be motivated not by a desire to see the end of the NI team, but see an end to the alarming and hostile polarization of footballing loyalties on a sectarian basis
I think we can safely assume that
a) it would see the effective end of the NI team whether or not that was your motivation, and
b) it would be as likely to end polarization as Poland abandoning Catholicism and making vegetarian sausage the state religion (sorry, I'm still feeling the effects of Saturday's lunch) ;)
It might be a stupid and niaive idea but it that's the case it should be countered without misrepresentation or simplifaction
I'm willing to accept your motive is naive rather than to stir. But no-one's misrepresenting and the simplification is because the issue is er, simple.
third policeman
07/09/2009, 3:11 PM
Let's get over this one and move on EG. On the subject of Wednesday's game I hope your confidence is well founded. Personally I would worry about NI's ability to score without Lafferty to lead the line, but assuming you secure second place, what are the chances of FIFA stitching up the play offs with an NI v ROI fixture? Does it realy enhance the global brand to have two Irish teams at the World Cup? Maybe its just my paranioa, but I have a bad feeling about this.
Gather round
07/09/2009, 4:00 PM
.Personally I would worry about NI's ability to score without Lafferty to lead the line
I was genuinely amazed we created so many chances and half chances away from home. Give all three strikers plus midfielder (esp Davis) credit. 1-0 would do against the Slovaks.
but assuming you secure second place
Realistically, I think it could finish:
sk 19 (lose, win, lose)
cs 18 (win, win, win)
ni 17 (win, lose)
pl 15 (draw, lose, win)
si 15 (draw, lose, win)
sm 0 (lose, lose)
what are the chances of FIFA stitching up the play offs with an NI v ROI fixture?
GSpain, Geysir and others on this site are well informed on the likelihood of a fix (they'd say high, I think). It'll be fixed primarily to include France and Russia or Germany, not exclude Northern Ireland.
Does it realy enhance the global brand to have two Irish teams at the World Cup?
I think it's irrelevant to the global brand to be honest how many appear in South Africa.
FIFA's heads of security and PR might prefer there not to be play-offs in Dublin and Belfast.
Maybe its just my paranioa, but I have a bad feeling about this
Relax :)
PS EG and I (met him for a drink in Chorzow) are genuinely two different people, Fermanagh and north Belfast respectively.
EalingGreen
07/09/2009, 4:22 PM
but assuming you secure second place, what are the chances of FIFA stitching up the play offs with an NI v ROI fixture? Does it realy enhance the global brand to have two Irish teams at the World Cup? Maybe its just my paranioa, but I have a bad feeling about this.
Yep, Paranoia it is.
Imo, you are falling into the same trap as quite a few football fans from both NI and ROI.
You see, neither team is important in the grand scheme of things, so avoiding eg having two Irish teams in South Africa will not presently be anywhere near the top of FIFA's Agenda when, for instance, both the Korean teams have already qualified, or Argentina may not.
In which case, if eventually the Play-Off Draw should prove to be anything less than fair and above board with respect to NI and ROI, it will be because each of us two 'minnows' will be "drawn" separately, so as to give two "big" team like France or Russia (even Germany?) the best possible chance of going to SA, rather than just one of them.
P.S. I have found the rest of your posts on this thread to be patronising, ill-informed, poorly thought-out and verging on the offensive. However, in the spirit of Gather Round, with whom you appear to be mistaking me, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and add Naivety, not Malice, to your 'Charge Sheet', to go with the Paranoia... :rolleyes:
gspain
08/09/2009, 9:38 AM
GSpain, Geysir and others on this site are well informed on the likelihood of a fix (they'd say high, I think). It'll be fixed primarily to include France and Russia or Germany, not exclude Northern Ireland.
I think it's irrelevant to the global brand to be honest how many appear in South Africa.
FIFA's heads of security and PR might prefer there not to be play-offs in Dublin and Belfast.
We are both pretty insignificant as far as FIFA are concerned. We certainly won't be drawn together in a fix or separated in a fix. As GR has said France and other major tv markets will be the main priority. They will want Ronaldo there too so Portugal's ball will spend an hour on the radiator before the draw.
If Germany end up in the playoffs (and there is still a good chance of this) then they will also be favoured.
I'd love a NI v RoI playoff. We'd both have a good chance of going through. I'd certainly take that now.
Schumi
08/09/2009, 10:09 AM
They will want Ronaldo there too so Portugal's ball will spend an hour on the radiator before the draw.
If they make it into the play-offs.
third policeman
08/09/2009, 10:11 AM
P.S. I have found the rest of your posts on this thread to be patronising, ill-informed, poorly thought-out and verging on the offensive. However, in the spirit of Gather Round, with whom you appear to be mistaking me, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and add Naivety, not Malice, to your 'Charge Sheet', to go with the Paranoia... :rolleyes:
Wow thanks for the compliment, but in most of these categories I will be struggling to compete with your good self. Given that I have never stated or implied that you and GR are one and the same (may have misattributed a thread perhaps), looks like you could teach me a fewthings about paranioa as well.
Gather round
08/09/2009, 10:35 AM
Given that I have never stated or implied that you and GR are one and the same (may have misattributed a thread perhaps)
You referred to me as EG in #42 above. I assumed that was just a typo, but you also seemed to imply we agree on all the main contentious issues. We don't- I've no problem with NI-based players playing for the Republic, for example. Provided they haven't already played for us after age 18 etc. etc.
third policeman
08/09/2009, 12:00 PM
You referred to me as EG in #42 above. I assumed that was just a typo, but you also seemed to imply we agree on all the main contentious issues. We don't- I've no problem with NI-based players playing for the Republic, for example. Provided they haven't already played for us after age 18 etc. etc.
Your'e right a typo, and I did not mean to imply that you agree on all "contentious issues". The only issue that I have communicated with you and EG about on this or other threads is one where you clearly do agree, and that relates to the "ambiemce" and iconography that surrounds the NI international team. Despite your claims and assurances I am afraid that I will continue to rely on the evidence of my own senses (albeit through the medium of TV these days) and the testimony of NI fans who are friends of mine, that the NI support base is almost entirely Unionist and this fact is reflected in chants, banners and emblems that might not be directly sectarian but are exclsuive and partisan. This in itself inhibits efforts to build cross-community support for the NI team, and I now dont know a single person from the Nationalist community who now follows NI. Sadly (and contrary to the situation in my own youth) nearly all nationalists I know now view the NI team deep antagonism and hostility (though happily this is not the case with actual players). It's not as if I am talking about rabid shinners. From inside the community of committed NI supporters this might not look like a problem, but to me its sad and the spectacle of Irish football divided on sectarian lines is deeply, deeply despiriting.
Gather round
08/09/2009, 1:47 PM
Your'e right a typo, and I did not mean to imply that you agree on all "contentious issues"
My mistake, apologies.
NI support base is almost entirely Unionist and this fact is reflected in chants, banners and emblems that might not be directly sectarian but are exclsuive and partisan
I know a handful of other exclusively NI fans from the broad Catholic Nationalist community, and many more who are happy enough to follow both teams equally or look for our results second. All these would disagree with you that the atmosphere as described above is exclusive or unwelcoming. If it was, presumably they wouldn't follow the team.
Of course it's partisan, that's the whole point of international sport. I do worry it might get a lot more partisan than usual if/ when the two teams play each other, but otherwise I'm comfortable with it.
This in itself inhibits efforts to build cross-community support for the NI team
Given my reply above, I don't think it does. There is plenty of evidence- much of it documented on this forum- that efforts to build wider support, specifically in nationalist areas/ clubs/ schools, are having some success.
Sadly (and contrary to the situation in my own youth) nearly all nationalists I know now view the NI team deep antagonism and hostility...from inside the community of committed NI supporters this might not look like a problem
Without wishing to be too trite, it's clearly much more of a problem for you and your friends than me and mine. We can only suggest that you either a) come along to a game and/ or b) just take a chill pill?
but to me its sad and the spectacle of Irish football divided on sectarian lines is deeply, deeply despiriting
It isn't thus divided. But if you can't be convinced, I won't labor the point.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.