micls
17/03/2009, 7:55 PM
People seem to be viewing success as directly equating to being the best.
Here's why it's a fallacy.
Put the current Barca, Man U or any similar team in the LoI and they'd walk it. In fact, I could manage them and they'd still win. Would that make me the best manager? Clearly not.
So why didnt Doolin, McDonnell or Mathews win it? Why didnt ye come closer than 20odd points behind? Because theres no way in hell ye spent that much less, comparatively?
To claim developing youth is the only way to be a good manager is ridiculous. How many Derry players atm came through their youth system(how many have been youths while Kenny was manager?) and how many did Kenny buy in? Buying other people's youths just means you've an eye for talent, it doesnt mean you're the one developing it. Kenny prefers spotting younger talent e.g. McGinn, but he's still just buying/taking what other people have developed.
If developing talent is the only thing that matters then Pete Mahon is the best manager in the league, however most would accept that while its a good talent its far from the only important thing.
Being able to spot a player that will improve your team and put together a team that can dominate(like Shels) is a talent. Being able to take an underachieving team, whip them into shape and make them close to unbeatable is a talent. Being able to get that same team to keep focus and play football weeks after the league is over(when they hammered us 3-0) is a talent.
Fenlon has many managerial talent, not perfect by any means, but to simply label him a a 'chequebook manager' is ridiculous. That implies the person with the most money winning, which has been repeatedly stated is not the case.
Here's why it's a fallacy.
Put the current Barca, Man U or any similar team in the LoI and they'd walk it. In fact, I could manage them and they'd still win. Would that make me the best manager? Clearly not.
So why didnt Doolin, McDonnell or Mathews win it? Why didnt ye come closer than 20odd points behind? Because theres no way in hell ye spent that much less, comparatively?
To claim developing youth is the only way to be a good manager is ridiculous. How many Derry players atm came through their youth system(how many have been youths while Kenny was manager?) and how many did Kenny buy in? Buying other people's youths just means you've an eye for talent, it doesnt mean you're the one developing it. Kenny prefers spotting younger talent e.g. McGinn, but he's still just buying/taking what other people have developed.
If developing talent is the only thing that matters then Pete Mahon is the best manager in the league, however most would accept that while its a good talent its far from the only important thing.
Being able to spot a player that will improve your team and put together a team that can dominate(like Shels) is a talent. Being able to take an underachieving team, whip them into shape and make them close to unbeatable is a talent. Being able to get that same team to keep focus and play football weeks after the league is over(when they hammered us 3-0) is a talent.
Fenlon has many managerial talent, not perfect by any means, but to simply label him a a 'chequebook manager' is ridiculous. That implies the person with the most money winning, which has been repeatedly stated is not the case.