A face
25/02/2009, 9:11 PM
FAI response to claims made by Gareth Farrelly
FAI response to Gareth Farrelly’s claims in the Sun newspaper this morning:
1) Gareth Farrelly’s claim that he could not trust the FAI to resolve the issue of his unpaid wages is unfounded. All players who were due outstanding monies by Cork City FC and followed the club licensing process have received payment in full accordance with the agreements reached between the players, the PFAI and the club. This outcome was achieved following insistence by the FAI club licensing department that Cork City FC deal with these matters.
2) Gareth Farrelly’s decision to take his dispute over the payment of wages by Cork City FC last season to a national legislative body precluded the Independent Club Licensing Committee from including his case in their decision to award a license to Cork City FC. (FIN 1.04, FAI Club licensing manual).
3) Furthermore, Gareth Farrelly’s claims that the FAI could not have been trusted to represent his interests in a separate case involving the FIFA 3 club rule are equally misplaced. The FAI represented the cases of 8 players who were unable to play as a consequence of this rule to FIFA and was successful in all 8 cases. Gareth Farrelly was represented by his club’s solicitors and this case was unsuccessful.
Taken from www.eircomloi.ie (http://www.eircomloi.ie/news-centre/media-centre/february-2009/news/news/news-1/news/index.xml)
FAI response to Gareth Farrelly’s claims in the Sun newspaper this morning:
1) Gareth Farrelly’s claim that he could not trust the FAI to resolve the issue of his unpaid wages is unfounded. All players who were due outstanding monies by Cork City FC and followed the club licensing process have received payment in full accordance with the agreements reached between the players, the PFAI and the club. This outcome was achieved following insistence by the FAI club licensing department that Cork City FC deal with these matters.
2) Gareth Farrelly’s decision to take his dispute over the payment of wages by Cork City FC last season to a national legislative body precluded the Independent Club Licensing Committee from including his case in their decision to award a license to Cork City FC. (FIN 1.04, FAI Club licensing manual).
3) Furthermore, Gareth Farrelly’s claims that the FAI could not have been trusted to represent his interests in a separate case involving the FIFA 3 club rule are equally misplaced. The FAI represented the cases of 8 players who were unable to play as a consequence of this rule to FIFA and was successful in all 8 cases. Gareth Farrelly was represented by his club’s solicitors and this case was unsuccessful.
Taken from www.eircomloi.ie (http://www.eircomloi.ie/news-centre/media-centre/february-2009/news/news/news-1/news/index.xml)