Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Is it time for a rethink?

  1. #21
    Seasoned Pro gael353's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Limerick
    Posts
    3,182
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    36
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    61
    Thanked in
    45 Posts
    Talk of the underage is a deflection tactic by some

  2. #22
    International Prospect osarusan's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    7,908
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,206
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,787
    Thanked in
    999 Posts
    To be honest, if the club is doing stuff that is an attempt to help the wider community, even if that has no real benefit to Limerick FC, then so be it. I can see why it appeals to the people in charge.

    I don't think our current frailty is really a result of that kind of activity anyway. We have a squad that is limited, and a set of players that have no steel about them...but would any of that change of there was a 'rethink' of the club's ethos or whatever? I don't think so. Sure, those activities may take money away from the first team, but I think our issue is money badly spent, more than not having enough.

    We have a new manager who will be hoping to bring in new players. With luck, our team will be a lot more battle-hardened by the end of the transfer window, and our manager will be more attuned to the qualities of the players he has at his disposal.

  3. #23
    Seasoned Pro bluewhitearmy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Limerick
    Posts
    4,895
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    112
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    646
    Thanked in
    420 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by osarusan View Post
    To be honest, if the club is doing stuff that is an attempt to help the wider community, even if that has no real benefit to Limerick FC, then so be it. I can see why it appeals to the people in charge.

    I don't think our current frailty is really a result of that kind of activity anyway. We have a squad that is limited, and a set of players that have no steel about them...but would any of that change of there was a 'rethink' of the club's ethos or whatever? I don't think so. Sure, those activities may take money away from the first team, but I think our issue is money badly spent, more than not having enough.

    We have a new manager who will be hoping to bring in new players. With luck, our team will be a lot more battle-hardened by the end of the transfer window, and our manager will be more attuned to the qualities of the players he has at his disposal.
    I could be wrong but more than a money thing I think LTID meant he would be a lot happier if the people in charge of the club concentrated more on the senior team as in actually looking at what is happening with it and taking action rather than spend more money on it or less on community projects. For example you mention the "squad that is limited, and a set of players that have no steel about them" well that squad is how it is because the previous manager who the dogs on the street knew couldn't sign players was kept in charge for flimsy reasons at best and then we had the club realise months after everyone else that he couldn't sign players so they had to go and throw it together. Its things like this where they seem to cop things months after everyone else while concentrating on nonsense that bothers people I think.

    It just seems to always be wasted money in the wrong places with us like nobody is saying we shouldn't have an underage set up but supposedly millions have been spent on it and what have we got in return? How many players have come through the system? How many are coming through with a buzz about them now? Would some of this huge money spent on that not have been better off doing something with Bruff? Has anything at all happened out in Bruff? Its just missed opportunity after missed opportunity and I can see why people are getting sick of it.

  4. #24
    International Prospect osarusan's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    7,908
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,206
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,787
    Thanked in
    999 Posts
    But what else can you do apart from choose a manager and have the manager sign players?

    Do you mean that, if the people in charge had been more focused on the senior team, they'd have chosen a better manager...then I can see what you mean, but tbh, that's probably a case of them not being able to evaluate a manager, more than just being distracted by other things.

    On the money spent on youth, again, I disagree to an extent.

    Now, maybe people like the idea of cutting down on youth as much as possible to have more money for the senior team - that's fair enough. Money shouldn't be wasted, anywhere. But I don't think it's as simple as saying that we should evaluate the youth system based on the quality of player that emerges, and that if no good players are coming through, then it's been a waste of time. Is the youth set-up well run, and is money that is spent on it being spent wisely? If not, then maybe it's a question of waste, rather than the youth setup itself. But youth teams are naturally going to have periods when no good players come through. Everything could be set up just right, and still not get any reward.

    But again, it's a question of priorities. What might have happened in Bruff, for example? And if we'd spent the money on that instead, and some local player had been snapped up by another LOI team/UK team rather than coming through our youth sustem, would we be saying that we'd missed an opportunity there?

    I suppose the key question is deciding what are the things that the club really needs, and in what order. We are never going to get everybody to agree on that.

  5. #25
    Seasoned Pro bluewhitearmy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Limerick
    Posts
    4,895
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    112
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    646
    Thanked in
    420 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by osarusan View Post
    But what else can you do apart from choose a manager and have the manager sign players?

    Do you mean that, if the people in charge had been more focused on the senior team, they'd have chosen a better manager...then I can see what you mean, but tbh, that's probably a case of them not being able to evaluate a manager, more than just being distracted by other things.

    On the money spent on youth, again, I disagree to an extent.

    Now, maybe people like the idea of cutting down on youth as much as possible to have more money for the senior team - that's fair enough. Money shouldn't be wasted, anywhere. But I don't think it's as simple as saying that we should evaluate the youth system based on the quality of player that emerges, and that if no good players are coming through, then it's been a waste of time. Is the youth set-up well run, and is money that is spent on it being spent wisely? If not, then maybe it's a question of waste, rather than the youth setup itself. But youth teams are naturally going to have periods when no good players come through. Everything could be set up just right, and still not get any reward.

    But again, it's a question of priorities. What might have happened in Bruff, for example? And if we'd spent the money on that instead, and some local player had been snapped up by another LOI team/UK team rather than coming through our youth sustem, would we be saying that we'd missed an opportunity there?

    I suppose the key question is deciding what are the things that the club really needs, and in what order. We are never going to get everybody to agree on that.
    On the first question imo they should never have hired the manager in the first place but thats another story what they could have done this year is not keep that manager when he had proven he wasn't up for the job. Russell was hired supposedly because of how great he was going to be for bringing through people from the youth set up as it turned out 1. We had nobody really good enough to bring through 2. He had absolutely no interest in working with them anyway. And I do mean that had they been more focused on the first team then they would have sacked the manager when it was clear he had no clue. Like you say what more could they do then choose a manager and have him sign players but the manager at the time didn't/couldn't sign players really and I heard loads upon loads of people bring this up before it all came to a head the only ones who didn't see it were the decision makers. As you say though that could be just because they don't know how to evaluate it rather than being distracted but I can see how people can think it is a bit of the distraction thing too tbh. For me personally I don't care which it was I just know either way it wasn't good for the club.

    On the whole youth system side of things too when I talk about it and I think its the same for LTID we don't mean the academy which funds itself at this point I think we mean the club funded age groups like soon to be 15s, 17s and 19s I believe. And I most definitely believe the 17s and 19s should be judged on what comes through to the first team it is to me anyway the entire point of them. I am in no way saying cut back as much as possible either but Pat has said time and time again that he has spent millions on the youth set up my question is on what? The entire youth set up has in no way been a waste of time because as others have pointed out it has brought more fans and families to the club but if we are still here in 2 or 3 years time and nobody has come through then it has been a failure in my view. The one person who did actually make it in to first team from it didn't even really make it through the system and force his way in Paudie was thrown in cos we had nobody else at the time and even his exit went very badly.

    The Bruff thing if it was done properly would actually have saved the club a ton of money on training costs and the costs of having to pay for pitches for the underage teams to play games on so why that wasn't prioritised more I don't know but there may be reasons we don't know about there.

    I think there are just a lot of little things that are building up for the people that know about them and eventually they get a bit sick of it like LTID has. I would never wanna just slate the club completely cos I have seen how hard some of the people involved work and how good some of them are at what they do but then there are definitely others hanging on that offer nothing or are not good enough at what they are there to do. Tbh though I am just trying to make sense of what I think are annoying others most of it I couldn't really care less about yes I want the club to be strong as possible and yes some of the things I find a bit stupid but if the first team is really what I care about so its only the decisions that hurt that which really bother me.

  6. #26
    International Prospect NeverFeltBetter's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gouldavoher
    Posts
    5,175
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    259
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    812
    Thanked in
    581 Posts
    Certainly nothing wrong with club doing an evaluation of what it is spending money on and what it is getting back for it, but as people have said, from there the club would need to decide, clearly, what it is it actually wants for its investment. With the Youth, if it's "Players for the first team/players to export to England" then you can't say its worth it, but there are less fiscal benefits to the youth set-up, in terms of community engagement, creating a young fanbase, etc. Same with the other programs, like the aforementioned Mongolian link-ins and prison stuff. I'm not even sure how much that stuff costs, but the club would need to decide if helping convicted criminals retain fitness and maybe helping with rehab is a good use of their time and money, when there really isn't any direct tangible result for the club (and does the Mongolian thing cost us anything?). On a purely personal level, I actually like that the club does such things, but if the purse strings ever needed to be tightened then it should absolutely be one of the first things considered.

    POS could cut everything else to the quick and pour what is left into the senior team, but Limerick's general haplessness with transfers - that pre-dates Russell if we're being honest, though it was at its worst under him - would see it all squandered as things stand. If we're talking re-thinks and re-appraisals, how the club leadership and squad management go about transfer business should be at the top of the list, regardless of who the names actually are.
    Author of Never Felt Better (History, Film Reviews).

  7. #27
    Apprentice
    Joined
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    92
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    A smear indeed, and not helped by the internal war being waged. It is indeed time for a change, but it must be a clean sweep - We are no better off than the day we appointed Stuart Taylor and have learned nothing from it. We have a gaping deficit of football intelligence running right through the club for years and keep making the same mistakes. Kenny, Fenlon, Barraclough etc were all interested in the Limerick job at various stages and we opted for Taylor, Russell, almost Nugent and then McDonald as the decision makers opted for the default position ... Get someone from England ! First thing we need is to recognize what we are bad at
    1.Appointing managers - We are dreadful at it. How about forming an experienced football panel made up of people who know the game and pay them a consultants fee or appoint a director of football (ie) someone like Brian Kerr who knows the game and may not want to manage full time but who has in depth knowledge of the game and the people in it.
    2. Provide some clarity - Limerick supporters have to be the most under informed fans in the globe, it's like the Kremlin. From the Markets field being open on time (the dogs in the road knew it wasn't going to be), fabrication of discussions with potential managers that didn't happen and alliances with every organisation known to man. Give it a miss !! And on top of that we have the latest boardroom saga with people at the wheel positioning themselves to welcome the new "He who might be King"
    3. The board - Can we honestly believe that we have a fully functioning board, one that has the balls to raise unpalatable or contentious issues.... It's standard fair and a requirement everywhere else you know. Did anyone ever do a cost comparison to other clubs to quantify what have we actually achieved in the last six years ? If JP hadn't financed the MF what would we have to show for all that expenditure.... Hardly inspiring for any new investor.... .

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Bohsnews is having a rethink... you can help
    By BohDiddley in forum Bohemians
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07/06/2007, 5:15 PM
  2. Time To Rethink On Summer Football
    By renovater in forum Junior League
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 11/12/2006, 9:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •