Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 161 to 174 of 174

Thread: Brexit - The End of the United Kingdom?

  1. #161
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,283
    Thanks
    3,279
    Thanked 3,633 Times in 2,228 Posts
    "Vote Leave Campaign Chief Dominic Cummings Admits Leaving The EU Could ‘Be An Error’": http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entr...b02734df33fbc0

    Quote Originally Posted by Owen Bennett
    The brains behind the Brexit vote has admitted it might be possible that leaving the EU “will be an error” and the referendum itself was a “dumb idea”.

    Dominic Cummings, the campaign director for the official Vote Leave campaign, claimed “other things should have been tried first” before the referendum was called - suggesting he would have backed further attempts at reform.

  2. #162
    Coach BonnieShels's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Elm Valley, Blackpool
    Posts
    11,717
    Thanks
    2,174
    Thanked 2,535 Times in 1,741 Posts
    Dya ever get the feeling that the more they delve into this now that the discussions are now on that they may balk at the whole thing and go "Soz bbz... can I haz EU back thx!"
    DID YOU NOTICE A SIGN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE...?

  3. #163
    Coach BonnieShels's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Elm Valley, Blackpool
    Posts
    11,717
    Thanks
    2,174
    Thanked 2,535 Times in 1,741 Posts
    I missed this the last day:


    Quote Originally Posted by The Grauniad
    Verhofstad also suggested that after the UK exits the EU those with Irish passports in Northern Ireland should be allowed to vote in European elections across the border.

    Verhofstad said the number of European seats could be increased from the current 11 to allow for Northern Irish voters to still exercise some influence in the EU as part of any post-Brexit deal.

    The Democratic Unionists in turn said it would use its parliamentary muscle to force the government to block any moves allowing for Northern Ireland voters to elect MEPs in the Irish Republic.

    DUP MP Sir Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian there was “no chance” his party would accept such an arrangement after Brexit.

    Donaldson said the 10 DUP MPs at Westminster who currently shore up the minority Conservative government would insist to the prime minister that Verhostad’s proposal be rejected out of hand in Brexit negotiations.

    “His idea would be a breach of the Good Friday agreement which keeps all constitutional change within strand one of that agreement, namely only within Northern Ireland.

    “This idea would also upset the delicate constitutional balance we have worked out here and would endanger the peace process,” the Lagan Valley MP added.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics...histle-remarks
    DID YOU NOTICE A SIGN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE...?

  4. #164
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,283
    Thanks
    3,279
    Thanked 3,633 Times in 2,228 Posts
    In what way would Verhofstad's proposal to allow northern EU citizens to vote for representative MEPs contravene the GFA (as claimed by Jeffrey Donaldson)? Permitting northern EU citizens a vote wouldn't have to necessitate constitutional change, would it? If anything, it might somewhat ameliorate nationalist fears and disgruntlement. It's also exceptionally rich to hear a Brexit supporter warning of endangerment to the peace process. Irony is dead.

    I doubt parties that operate only south of the border would be too keen on Verhofstad's idea either as Sinn Féin would most likely stand to take all northern seats on offer if there was to be a unionist boycott.

    I think it'd be a positive move. If unionists want to be intransigent and opt out of things like that, let them. Their loss. As progressive unionist Sophie Long warned, they're only going to get left behind by developments and will look like fools stuck on the outside when it eventually comes to negotiating a new, agreed Ireland and they've marginalised themselves from the re-unification process so much that they won't have any influence over its direction.

    Meanwhile, Lisa O'Carroll writes in the Guardian that Dublin is streets ahead of other EU rivals as London firms plan for post-Brexit relocation: https://www.theguardian.com/business...location-plans

    Quote Originally Posted by Lisa O'Carroll
    In boardrooms across London, bank executives are deciding where to move tens of thousands of jobs in the event of a hard Brexit. Rival European financial centres, including Paris, Frankfurt and Luxembourg, are vying for the business – but Dublin is emerging as the most popular destination.

    Hundreds of banks, insurers, fund managers and other major City firms had until Friday to tell the Bank of England how they intend to cope in the event of a hard Brexit.

    Accountants at EY last week said 59 out of the 222 biggest financial services companies in the UK have made public statements about moving staff from Britain to the EU because of Brexit. Dublin, which is still scarred by Ireland’s financial crisis, is the top destination with 19 firms mentioning a possible move to the Irish capital.

  5. #165
    First Team Gather round's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2006
    Location
    West Midlands, England
    Posts
    1,952
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked 197 Times in 156 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    It's also exceptionally rich to hear a Brexit supporter warning of endangerment to the peace process. Irony is dead
    It isn't. 'Threat to Peace Process' is just a cliche/ euphemism for 'Anything in NI politics I disagree with'. Extending the Augnacloy Autobahn or York Street flyover with Tory handouts doesn't threaten anyone; nor does electing another gombeen Shinner who makes Martina Anderson sound like a World stateswoman by comparison. In other words- Jeff's talking cojones, but no more than anyone else

    I doubt parties that operate only south of the border would be too keen on Verhofstad's idea either as Sinn Féin would most likely stand to take all northern seats on offer if there was to be a unionist boycott...I think it'd be a positive move
    It'd be slightly more positive with more support (ie if the Unionists, the Fianna Failers, the Blueshirts, the Labour weren't likely to blank it). It's an empty stunt.

    As progressive unionist Sophie Long
    Long has now left the UVF's political wing which I suppose makes her slightly more progressive than before. But let's see some electoral support before we give her full credit...
    Last edited by Gather round; 17/07/2017 at 11:11 AM.

  6. #166
    Coach BonnieShels's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Elm Valley, Blackpool
    Posts
    11,717
    Thanks
    2,174
    Thanked 2,535 Times in 1,741 Posts
    Can anyone decipher what exactly Leo said wrong here?

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2017/0731/89...brexit-border/

    Cos what i read is a unionist being against a relatively partitioist viewpoint of our Taoiseach.
    DID YOU NOTICE A SIGN OUTSIDE MY HOUSE...?

  7. #167
    Seasoned Pro NeverFeltBetter's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gouldavoher
    Posts
    3,304
    Thanks
    210
    Thanked 437 Times in 291 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BonnieShels View Post
    Can anyone decipher what exactly Leo said wrong here?

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2017/0731/89...brexit-border/

    Cos what i read is a unionist being against a relatively partitioist viewpoint of our Taoiseach.
    He's a bit more forthright on the issue than may be expected I suppose, but that's about it. His general message of "This is your mess, if you want to deal with a hard border you're handling all the particulars, not us" is just very unwelcome for a DUP that presumably doesn't want more unhappiness from the border areas and would rather believe in a "Let's all make Brexit a success together!" fairy tale.
    Author of Never Felt Better (History, Film Reviews).

  8. Thanks From:


  9. #168
    Apprentice
    Joined
    May 2017
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DannyInvincible View Post
    In what way would Verhofstad's proposal to allow northern EU citizens to vote for representative MEPs contravene the GFA (as claimed by Jeffrey Donaldson)? Permitting northern EU citizens a vote wouldn't have to necessitate constitutional change, would it? If anything, it might somewhat ameliorate nationalist fears and disgruntlement. It's also exceptionally rich to hear a Brexit supporter warning of endangerment to the peace process. Irony is dead.

    I doubt parties that operate only south of the border would be too keen on Verhofstad's idea either as Sinn Féin would most likely stand to take all northern seats on offer if there was to be a unionist boycott.

    I think it'd be a positive move. If unionists want to be intransigent and opt out of things like that, let them. Their loss. As progressive unionist Sophie Long warned, they're only going to get left behind by developments and will look like fools stuck on the outside when it eventually comes to negotiating a new, agreed Ireland and they've marginalised themselves from the re-unification process so much that they won't have any influence over its direction.
    How would this work? Into which constituency would NI-resident voters be added? I guess they'd have to be split between the existing four constituencies, but that in itself would be very odd - people living in NI voting in the Dublin or 'South' constituencies.

    I suppose they could just use one big constituency for the whole country like most of the other EU members.
    Last edited by BelfastCrusader; 07/08/2017 at 8:28 PM.

  10. #169
    First Team backstothewall's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,685
    Thanks
    128
    Thanked 317 Times in 208 Posts
    I'd assume NI would simply carry on electing 3 MEPs in a single constituency as we do now. Why reinvent the wheel?
    Bring Back Belfast Celtic F.C.

  11. #170
    Apprentice
    Joined
    May 2017
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by backstothewall View Post
    I'd assume NI would simply carry on electing 3 MEPs in a single constituency as we do now. Why reinvent the wheel?
    Would that be allowed? Who would administer the election? It would have to be done by postal vote surely?

    And the other constituencies would then have to reduce their MEPs by 3.

  12. #171
    Reserves KrisLetang's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    549
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 142 Times in 79 Posts
    Bloomberg columnist says Brexit is essentially meaningless.
    http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articl...like-no-brexit

  13. #172
    Not Entirely Sure nigel-harps1954's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2009
    Location
    On a dodgy bus
    Posts
    9,606
    Thanks
    3,105
    Thanked 2,675 Times in 1,561 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KrisLetang View Post
    Bloomberg columnist says Brexit is essentially meaningless.
    www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-28/brexit-is-beginning-to-look-like-no-brexit
    Nigel says Bloomberg columnist is talking out of his arse.

    Brexit is far from meaningless. Not even once did they mention the border in Ireland, which is arguably the one of the biggest things they have to consider as part of Brexit. To reiterate, it's far from meaningless.


  14. #173
    First Team backstothewall's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,685
    Thanks
    128
    Thanked 317 Times in 208 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BelfastCrusader View Post
    Would that be allowed? Who would administer the election? It would have to be done by postal vote surely?

    And the other constituencies would then have to reduce their MEPs by 3.
    It would be allowed as long as the EU agreed to it, and i can see no reason why they wouldnt agree. French citizens living in non-EU Overseas Territories of France currently elect MEPs and they EU are already considering the population of northern Cypriots when allocating seats to Cyprus, so precidents have already been set that make this fairly straightforward and which would mean no other areas would have to loose seats.

    If Ireland was considered as a single unit as Cyprus currently is the population used for apportionment would be increased from 4.2M (currently 11 MEPs) to 6.4M. Ireland would then have a population between Denmark (who get 13 for their 5.4M people) and Bulgaria (who get 17 for their 7.7M people). 14 seems about right for 6.4M based on those figures. Even if we only got 13 it would hardly be noticed if it happened alongside a boundary review and election.

    It could be done either entirely by postal vote, polling stations could be set up in local halls, council buildings etc (in areas where councils are agreeable to the idea), or there could be some combination of the 2 systems. At a push a transit van could serve as a mobile polling station. The infrastructure is about to be put in place for presidential elections no matter what happens with Brexit so the work will have to be done in any case.
    Last edited by backstothewall; 29/08/2017 at 4:35 PM.
    Bring Back Belfast Celtic F.C.

  15. #174
    Capped Player DannyInvincible's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Derry
    Posts
    11,283
    Thanks
    3,279
    Thanked 3,633 Times in 2,228 Posts
    The reflections of Dutch writer Joris Luyendijk, who has lived in London for the last six years, on English society and Brexit make for interesting reading: https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/m...loathe-england

    Quote Originally Posted by Joris Luyendijk
    Ever since the referendum, friends from across the world have been enquiring whether it is true that the British have gone mad. Without those six years in London, I would have unhesitatingly said “yes.” “A temporary bout of insanity” still seems the preferred explanation in much of Europe and among many British Remainers. But years of immersion in English culture and society have convinced me that actually, the Brexit vote should instead be seen as the logical and overdue outcome of a set of English pathologies.

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789

Similar Threads

  1. Brexit Impact on LOI
    By Mr A in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 28/08/2016, 9:54 PM
  2. RTE: Wenger worried by Brexit impact on Premier League
    By Foot.ie in forum Football Feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05/07/2016, 4:50 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01/07/2016, 10:50 AM
  4. Brexit and our league !
    By Kiki Balboa in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 29/06/2016, 7:15 PM
  5. United Kingdom Team
    By liam88 in forum World League Football
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 08/03/2004, 11:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •