Who'da thunk it? Rovers and Bohs fans bickering!

**sundance kid** · 08/09/2011, 11:17 AM

Having read through the accounts this morning, i can only assume that bohs are still using Hans Christian Andersen chartered accountants to do their books.

**Dave_SRFC** · 08/09/2011, 11:26 AM

Originally Posted by sundance kid

Having read through the accounts this morning, i can only assume that bohs are still using Hans Christian Andersen chartered accountants to do their books.

This is shocking news where did this all come from?

**marinobohs** · 08/09/2011, 12:42 PM

Originally Posted by sundance kid

Having read through the accounts this morning, i can only assume that bohs are still using Hans Christian Andersen chartered accountants to do their books.

......Yep, somebody should definately write to the FAI about that

**sundance kid** · 08/09/2011, 1:15 PM

no need. bohs membership are doing a good enough kamikaze job on their own

**marinobohs** · 08/09/2011, 2:15 PM

Originally Posted by sundance kid

no need. bohs membership are doing a good enough kamikaze job on their own

So just sticking to whining about it on FOOT.IE so ? I suppose thats an improvement

**sundance kid** · 08/09/2011, 2:27 PM

Who's whining? I think it's great. If you're a bohs member, are you happy with the accounts as filed?

**marinobohs** · 09/09/2011, 9:16 AM

Originally Posted by hoops1

pfffffffffh accounts. Who needs to worry about them when you have a banter bus and a fancy dress match to attend.

Can see how the "nouveau" LOI fans dont get supporting a team (ask shams that were at Tolka, RDS, Santry)

**sundance kid** · 09/09/2011, 11:13 AM

Originally Posted by marinobohs

Can see how the "nouveau" LOI fans dont get supporting a team (ask shams that were at Tolka, RDS, Santry)

Marino, seeing as you won't let us know whether you're happy with the accounts filed, maybe you can tell us why, in light of your constant jibes about rovers so called hooligan problem, you're advocating a move for known bohs hooloigans to be given a clean slate and let back into dalymount?

**Sean South** · 09/09/2011, 12:04 PM

The vultures jizzing in their pants I see

**Dodge** · 09/09/2011, 12:57 PM

Originally Posted by Sean South

The vultures jizzing in their pants I see

As much as you at the thought of protesting about TV football?

**marinobohs** · 09/09/2011, 1:44 PM

Originally Posted by sundance kid

Marino, seeing as you won't let us know whether you're happy with the accounts filed, maybe you can tell us why, in light of your constant jibes about rovers so called hooligan problem, you're advocating a move for known bohs hooloigans to be given a clean slate and let back into dalymount?

Not happy with the accounts (as still recording trading losses)

and not advocating "known bohs hooligans" be anything as I dont know any

. I would certainly object to any convicted hooligan serving on our board though. Ever.

Hope that allays your concerns so SK.

**hoopy** · 10/09/2011, 12:18 PM

Originally Posted by marinobohs

Not happy with the accounts (as still recording trading losses)

and not advocating "known bohs hooligans" be anything as I dont know any

. I would certainly object to any convicted hooligan serving on our board though. Ever.

Hope that allays your concerns so SK.

Always meant to ask, what was this conviction for seeing as you seem to know so much about it?

**marinobohs** · 12/09/2011, 11:14 AM

Originally Posted by sundance kid

Marino, seeing as you won't let us know whether you're happy with the accounts filed, maybe you can tell us why, in light of your constant jibes about rovers so called hooligan problem, you're advocating a move for known bohs hooloigans to be given a clean slate and let back into dalymount?

........Three days on and still no comment on scumrock hooligan behaviour on Friday night SK

. Your interest in such matters obviously confined to OTHER clubs ?
Hoopy, details regarding conviction of shams director discussed on this forum previously and as nobody (even the usual hooped denial merchants) disputed the facts no need to revisit it.

.........tell us again about those mad, bad Derry fans instead

**sundance kid** · 12/09/2011, 12:10 PM

I've no problem stating that anybody found to have thrown anything onto the pitch on Friday should immediately be banned for at least the rest of this season, and shouldn't ever be let back without paying their share of the fine thats coming. If they were never let back i'd be happy.

Maybe you'd like to explain this comment you made about your own hooligans being allowed into dalymount.
"Clear the decks once and for all - amnesty for all those currently banned."

**marinobohs** · 12/09/2011, 12:36 PM

Originally Posted by sundance kid

I've no problem stating that anybody found to have thrown anything onto the pitch on Friday should immediately be banned for at least the rest of this season, and shouldn't ever be let back without paying their share of the fine thats coming. If they were never let back i'd be happy.

Maybe you'd like to explain this comment you made about your own hooligans being allowed into dalymount.
"Clear the decks once and for all - amnesty for all those currently banned."

...... off thread but just to bring it to an end. Read the thread and it is in reference to those banned for clashing (verbally) with Board members NOT hooligans (in the context you mean). I am unaware of any hoolie incidents in Dalymount in recent years, apart from the Glentoran game where no Bohs fans were involved. Historic bans at Dalymount were dealt with last year I went so far as to clarify this in subsequent post on the thread.

Great to see you are such an avid follower of Bohs.com, feel free to join in the discussion. BTW (as you brought it up) happy to have the respective recent records of Dalymount versus SDCC ground RE "incidents" compared anytime and the respective records of both clubs in dealing with the issue.

**sundance kid** · 12/09/2011, 1:59 PM

Have read the thread thanks, and it's perfectly clear that you're pushing for all people banned to be let back in no matter what they've done. Then you get pulled up on your nonsense, and start to backtrack.
Very similar to your homophobic rant from earlier in the season actually.

**marinobohs** · 12/09/2011, 2:11 PM

Originally Posted by sundance kid

Have read the thread thanks, and it's perfectly clear that you're pushing for all people banned to be let back in no matter what they've done. Then you get pulled up on your nonsense, and start to backtrack.
Very similar to your homophobic rant from earlier in the season actually.

I made it clear the only time I want to see hooligan scum in Dalymount is in the away section when shams play there. As explained all those banned from Dalymount on hooligan grounds that wanted to regain admittance were dealt with by board LAST YEAR.

Therefore the only peolple currently banned (to the best of my knowledge) are those that "clashed" with board members.

As this all appears a little beyond your comprehension level perhaps you should content yourself with those witty songs about Zahed on the always ultra site

or issuing the odd press release about people throwing things in Derry.