Beecher Networks - Web Development, Hosting & Domains
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 149

Thread: SARI Press Statement concerning Ndo Incident

  1. #101
    International Prospect osarusan's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    7,924
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,207
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,788
    Thanked in
    1,000 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jicked View Post
    If you read my posts earlier in the thread you'd see my opinion on this. As I said, I was in the stand that night. I heard nothing, and I mean that genuinely and seriously. I'm not just saying that in the same way some will say a controversial goal was clearly onside. Hand on my heart, I heard no sort of racist abuse that night, if you believe me or not that's up to you, but there's an awful lot of Rovers fans, the vast majority, saying the same thing.
    Even going by the youtube clip you're still talking about a couple of seconds at a particular point at the game. There was no widespread or sustained racist abuse that night, it's ridiculous to claim otherwise.
    I fully believe you when you say you didn't hear it (but there is a difference between saying "I didn't hear anything" and saying "I didn't hear anything and therefore nothing happened" - you haven't said this, but I think others have implied it). I don't think anybody has claimed there was widespread or sustained racist abuse. It was obviously just a few morons.

    but the point is that it was obviously a few morons. I don't think we need to use the word 'alleged' any more. I personally think the youtube clip is pretty conclusive.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jicked View Post
    Like any organisation, Rovers board are not going to be made explain themselves for a few knackers who show up at a game. Instead they're probably more concerned with doing something about it practically, ensuring these people are not allowed back in had they been identified, or working with Gardaí and matchday staff to try and identify the source of any such problems in the future and have the knackers reefed out and given a life ban.
    It's not an either-or, is it? Why can't Rovers take 5 minutes to put a statement on the webise saying they condemn the noises made by a tiny number, and are committed to identifying them and banning them? The fact that it may be almost impossible to do that is almost beside the point.

  2. #102
    Youth Team Leeside Swagger's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    190
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    He's doing some add on the radio now for european anti racisim week or something. Was on newstalk this morning. Nice timing!

  3. #103
    New Signing Magicme's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Monaghan
    Posts
    8,296
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    766
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    298
    Thanked in
    204 Posts
    Its FARE week. Football Against Racism Europe. Most clubs should be doing something around it and the half time entertainment last night was to mark it too. We will have kids at our game tomorrow night wearing the United Against Racism t-shirts and our team will be warming up in them too. We are involved in other events too.

    It is so important that racism is stamped out in this country before it takes hold. The changing face of Ireland means that many more children from different "ethnic" backgrounds are growing up feeling Irish and will be playing for our clubs and hopefully our country in the future and they need to be welcomed and made to feel safe and respected like everyone else.

    These campaigns can only do so much by raising awareness and thats why it is so important that we the fans and employees of clubs work to erradicate racism, report incidents and act on them.

    It is part of the contract of entering Monaghan United's Kingspan Century Park that you will not engage in racism in any form and those found to be doing so will be ejected from the ground, reported to the gardai and face disciplinary proceedures. I am sure it is the same at all grounds and it is up to us in the crowd at games to ensure that these things are carried out.

    Sorry for the longwinded rant but racism is the biggest thing that winds me up and I just cannot tolerate it.

  4. #104
    Banned dcfcsteve's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    6,345
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    74
    Thanked in
    35 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Calcio Jack View Post
    Not pathetic but simply the reality until proven otherwise...or does the norm of innocent until proven guilty not apply to SRFC ?
    What level of proof are you looking for though ?

    Signed confessions ?

  5. #105
    Banned dcfcsteve's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    6,345
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    74
    Thanked in
    35 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by placid casual View Post
    Every time I go against my better judgement and read this laughable thread, I get a mental image of Joey Ndo in a sari.

    $hit, am i a racist?
    Is he washing an elephant in your image of him....?

  6. #106
    Like the Fonz. Only a dog. Mr A's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2004
    Location
    In the gutter, but looking at the stars
    Posts
    11,485
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,735
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,312
    Thanked in
    1,524 Posts
    What the hell is racist about washing an elephant anyway? Surely elephant hygiene is important regardless of colour or creed?
    #NeverStopNotGivingUp

  7. #107
    Seasoned Pro dfx-'s Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Solvency
    Posts
    3,596
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    492
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    182
    Thanked in
    128 Posts
    Some elephants don't like it - they prefer private showering facilities
    The Model Club

    Tell all the Bohs you know
    that we've gone and won two-in-a-row
    and it's not gonna be three
    and it's not gonna be four
    it's more likely to be 5-1.

  8. #108
    Seasoned Pro Acornvilla's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    3,568
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    589
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    811
    Thanked in
    504 Posts
    your momma dosent mind where i wash her she does get mixed up with the elephants quite a lot thou.. (sorry not aimed at anyone in particu7lar just came into my head and had to share it.)
    Last edited by Acornvilla; 15/10/2009 at 5:07 PM.

  9. #109
    International Prospect Ezeikial's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,099
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,072
    Thanked in
    663 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SkStu View Post
    so then Bohs are "damned if they do and damned if they dont" in relation to the McGuinness incident. Thats basically what youre saying, right? Any chance you could take something as having been done simply in good faith? Of course not, it was big bad Bohs and their always evil and sinister ulterior motives... i really despair about some peoples vendettas on this messageboard, i really do.

    Or would you rather be another poster who attempts to ignore the issue at hand and drag this off topic just to get a dig in at Bohemians?
    I didn't "drag" this off topic - I responded to MarinoBohs who took Bohs/McGuinness in as a comparison. I simply gave the reasons why I thought the two situations were not comparable, and suggested an alternative possibility that Bohs actions may have been motivated more by damage limitation rather then principle.

    It seems to me that you may be too sensitive about what you perceive as "a dig" or "vendettas", as against considering an alternative view. Is this what some label "Bohs fans' obsession with anti-Bohs obsessions"?
    .


    Quote Originally Posted by SkStu View Post
    by the way any opinion on the Rovers boards complete lack of comment on their issue?
    Yes - but I am more concerned with racism and any racial abuse then the PR / point-scoring aspects of it.

    I abhor any form of racism, from whatever quarter it comes, and I think that Shamrock Rovers board would have been well advised to have made a public comment about it long ago.

  10. #110
    Seasoned Pro BohsPartisan's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Dublin 7
    Posts
    4,623
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    35
    Thanked in
    15 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dcfcsteve View Post
    What level of proof are you looking for though ?

    Signed confessions ?
    They'd probably claim they were forged or given under duress.
    TO TELL THE TRUTH IS REVOLUTIONARY

    The ONLY foot.ie user with a type of logic named after them!

    All of this has happened before. All of it will happen again.

  11. #111
    Banned dcfcsteve's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    6,345
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    74
    Thanked in
    35 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr A View Post
    What the hell is racist about washing an elephant anyway? Surely elephant hygiene is important regardless of colour or creed?
    *woooshhhh*

    It's a joke re a recent terrace anthem criticised in Engl...

    Never mind.

  12. #112
    Banned marinobohs's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in the bar celebratingl
    Posts
    3,629
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    360
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    645
    Thanked in
    427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ezeikial View Post
    It's somewhat pointless and a little disingenuous to be comparing the two situations.

    It was clear to Bohs that the McGuinness incident was noted by the referee and therefore almost certain to be included in his report. Many have reasonably questioned if Bohs subsequent reactions was more got to do with damage limitation than a genuine anti-racist stance. The paltry one match club suspension did little to dispel this notion.

    You also seem to have forgotten Pat Fenlons "it's part and parcel of the game, what can you do about it?" comment.
    Firstly, Pat fenlon and the player apoligised directly after the game - the act was still wrong but those involved showed remorse.
    My point was the differing reaction of the two boards to a racsist issue - hence using those two examples.
    As posters here know it is impossible for you to acknowledge any good by Bohs so obviously they had to have an ulterior motive for doing the right thing
    Whether the club reaction/penalty was sufficent is a matter for opinion but the fact remains that there was a speedy club reaction in one case and none at all in the other (this was my point).
    By your logic should the MK Hoops not have acted to "damage limitation" to the club (or avoid potential penalty ?)

  13. #113
    Banned marinobohs's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in the bar celebratingl
    Posts
    3,629
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    360
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    645
    Thanked in
    427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Calcio Jack View Post
    Not pathetic but simply the reality until proven otherwise...or does the norm of innocent until proven guilty not apply to SRFC ?
    The evidence is there for all to see, thats the point. if you (like the board at MK Hoops) choose to ignore it then supporters can make up their own mind on the issue. Please please do not deny that it happened as that argument is just ridiculous given the facts.
    Guilty when proven guilty and then there should be some sanction (STILL not looking for points deduction) otherwise the so called anti racism stance emanating from the bunker in Abbotstown is just hot air.

  14. #114
    First Team Calcio Jack's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,345
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    149
    Thanked in
    101 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by marinobohs View Post
    The evidence is there for all to see, thats the point. if you (like the board at MK Hoops) choose to ignore it then supporters can make up their own mind on the issue. Please please do not deny that it happened as that argument is just ridiculous given the facts.
    Guilty when proven guilty and then there should be some sanction (STILL not looking for points deduction) otherwise the so called anti racism stance emanating from the bunker in Abbotstown is just hot air.
    I think it is very questionable to assert that the proof is there for all to see (hear) and just because you continue to assert that , itdoesn't make it a fact. I haven't denied that it happened , however I don't think that the so called "facts" that you refer to are enough to prove anything either way. If you want to assert that on the balence of probabilty that the incident occured then I can accept that you believe that, however you also need to accept that I think the opposite.

    The one fact that is not in dispute is that no irrefutable evidence exists that the incident occured and hence even SARI referred to it as an 'alleged incident'.

  15. #115
    Banned dcfcsteve's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    6,345
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    74
    Thanked in
    35 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Calcio Jack View Post
    I think it is very questionable to assert that the proof is there for all to see (hear) and just because you continue to assert that , itdoesn't make it a fact. I haven't denied that it happened , however I don't think that the so called "facts" that you refer to are enough to prove anything either way. If you want to assert that on the balence of probabilty that the incident occured then I can accept that you believe that, however you also need to accept that I think the opposite.

    The one fact that is not in dispute is that no irrefutable evidence exists that the incident occured and hence even SARI referred to it as an 'alleged incident'.
    For the second time - what level of proof are you looking for here ?

  16. #116
    Banned marinobohs's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in the bar celebratingl
    Posts
    3,629
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    360
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    645
    Thanked in
    427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Calcio Jack View Post
    I think it is very questionable to assert that the proof is there for all to see (hear) and just because you continue to assert that , itdoesn't make it a fact. I haven't denied that it happened , however I don't think that the so called "facts" that you refer to are enough to prove anything either way. If you want to assert that on the balence of probabilty that the incident occured then I can accept that you believe that, however you also need to accept that I think the opposite.

    The one fact that is not in dispute is that no irrefutable evidence exists that the incident occured and hence even SARI referred to it as an 'alleged incident'.
    Pointless argument really as most have made up their own mind. As a matter of interest do you believe it happened and if it did what (if any action) should the club/FAI take about it ?

  17. #117
    New Signing joeSoap's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2003
    Location
    nomadic
    Posts
    5,828
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    18
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    23
    Thanked in
    18 Posts
    I have only skimmed through this thread, and from what I can gather it mainly is arguing the punishment given to Jason McGuinness as opposed to what punishment should be given to Shamrock Rovers. Correct me if I',m wrong.

    For me, Jason McGuinness is a professional footballer. An individual that is a supposed role model for young Bohs fans, and one who makes his living the same way that Joseph Ndo does. He racially abused, and was individually punished for his behaviour. And deservedly so. I thought Bohemians acted swiftly, and accordingly.

    Shamrock Rovers, its players and officials, did not racially abuse Joseph Ndo. People, racists included, voluntarily support clubs, and it is impossible to stop them. You can try and identify these goons and ban them from the ground, but whats to stop them from from doing it in other ways, via internet, down the pub etc.

    Jason McGuinness should have known better. His club acted upon it and sent out a message. IMO all Shamrock Rovers (or any club this happens to) can conceiveably do about this is send out a strong anti-racism message and try as best they can to identify the culprit(s). Fining them, or docking them points, or making them play behind closed doors would not be fair in my book. Racism is a crime, and Shamrock Rovers FC are not the Gardai. Perhaps McGuinness should have been criminally charged. Maybe this would send out a message.

  18. #118
    Seasoned Pro
    Joined
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    2,661
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    12
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    97
    Thanked in
    38 Posts
    Nowhere near enough evidence to persuade the DPP to prosecute McGuinness (who would have been fined less than he was by Bohs and the FAI if convicted, in any case.)

    Shamrock Rovers and SDCC, on the other hand, are guilty of permitting and failing to address racial abuse in the workplace, contrary to their own express policies, and could be sued for it.

    Anyone who can't hear the vile racial abuse in that clip simply doesn't want to hear it (it's even clearer on the original stream, still available online.) The reason SARI described it as alleged abuse was that I did the same in the description, out of an abundance of ultra-objectivity.
    A leading authority on League of Ireland football since 2003. You're probably wrong.

  19. #119
    First Team Calcio Jack's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,345
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    149
    Thanked in
    101 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by marinobohs View Post
    Pointless argument really as most have made up their own mind. As a matter of interest do you believe it happened and if it did what (if any action) should the club/FAI take about it ?
    Agree we could go around forever in a circle on this.To answer your question I simply don't know whether it did or didn't happen, therefore no point in engaging in conjecture as to what the club or the FAI should do.

  20. #120
    First Team Calcio Jack's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,345
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    149
    Thanked in
    101 Posts
    [QUOTE=Sheridan;1251436]Nowhere near enough evidence to persuade the DPP to prosecute McGuinness (who would have been fined less than he was by Bohs and the FAI if convicted, in any case.)

    Shamrock Rovers and SDCC, on the other hand, are guilty of permitting and failing to address racial abuse in the workplace, contrary to their own express policies, and could be sued for it

    The above is complete fabrication on the basis that nothing has been proved. I think you should accept the norm that one is innocent until proven guilty. Would that be possible or are you operating on the basis that as you have declared something to be a fact it is a fact ?

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Shamrock Rovers 400 Club Press Statement
    By WeAreRovers in forum Premier & First Divisions
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 30/05/2005, 3:07 PM
  2. Shamrock Rovers 400 Club Press Statement
    By WeAreRovers in forum Shamrock Rovers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28/05/2005, 11:12 AM
  3. SARI match
    By Hitman in forum Cork City
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01/09/2003, 5:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •