I am only addressing UCD's finances because you frequently berate others from a position of cosseted, dull safety (whether you choose to think that's nonsense or not).
My basic point, made before our college excursion, is that the question as originally posed is wide of the mark. It's a false opposition. Even if clubs are sensible and 'steady', without external support they may still go to the wall. It would be great if it were simply a matter of getting rid of a few so-called idiots, but unfortunately it's not that simple.
Bookmarks